in Re Warren Lee Gardiner ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued July 30, 2010

      

    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

    ————————————

    NO. 01-10-00358-CR

     

    IN Re Warren Lee Gardiner, Relator

     

    Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

     

     

    MEMORANDUM OPINION

              Relator, Warren Lee Gardiner, has filed in this Court a pro se document styled "application for writ of mandamus." We construe relator's document as a petition for writ of mandamus.  In his petition relator requests that we order respondents[1] to correct the records of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice related to his convictions in the 248th District Court of Harris County in cause numbers 534487 and 534488.  We deny the petition.

              This Court has mandamus jurisdiction against a district court judge or county court judge in our district, and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.  See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2009).  We have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against a district clerk unless such is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.  In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692 (Tex. App.CSan Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding).  It is appellant=s burden to provide this Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief.  Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

              In addition, there are three prerequisites for the issuance of a writ of mandamus by an appellate court, namely:  (1) the lower court must have a legal duty to perform a nondiscretionary act; (2) the relator must make a demand for performance; and (3) the subject court must refuse that request.  Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1992, orig. proceeding).  Relator has not provided us with a record that shows that he made any request of respondent trial court judge to perform a nondiscretionary act that respondent refused.

              Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Hanks.

    Do not publish.   Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

     

     



    [1]           Relator names as respondents the 248th District Court and Loren Jackson, Harris County District Clerk, as the respondent.  Relator’s petition does not contain a certificate of service stating that he served Loren Jackson or the 248th District Court Judge. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.5.    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-10-00358-CR

Filed Date: 7/30/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/3/2015