in Re: Black Horse Carriers, Inc. ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • DENY; and Opinion Filed December 12, 2018.
    In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-18-00881-CV
    IN RE BLACK HORSE CARRIERS, INC., Relator
    Original Proceeding from the 95th Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-09587
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Boatright
    Opinion by Justice Boatright
    At issue in this petition for writ of mandamus are the general venue provisions that allow
    a lawsuit to be filed either in the county of the defendant’s residence at the time the cause of action
    accrued if the defendant is a natural person or in the county of the defendant’s principal office in
    this state if the defendant is not a natural person. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. §
    15.002(a)(2),(3). Andrew Terrell filed the underlying suit against Black Horse and a Black Horse
    employee in Dallas County alleging, in relevant part, that Black Horse’s Dallas County office is a
    “principal office” under the general venue statute. Id. §§ 15.001(a), 15.002(a)(3). Denying the
    venue allegation, Black Horse and its employee moved to transfer the suit to Denton County, the
    employee’s county of residence. Id. § 15.002(a)(2). The trial court summarily denied the motion,
    and Black Horse now seeks relief from that order.
    Because the general venue provisions are at issue, mandamus relief is appropriate only if
    exceptional circumstances are shown. In re Masonite Corp., 
    997 S.W.2d 194
    , 197 (Tex. 1999).
    On the record before us, we conclude Black Horse has not shown exceptional circumstances.
    Compare In re Team Rocket, 
    256 S.W.3d 257
    , 259-60 (Tex. 2008) (trial court violated Texas Rule
    of Civil Procedure 87(5) by revisiting venue determination made by another court) and Henderson
    v. O’Neill, 
    797 S.W.2d 905
    , 905 (Tex. 1990) (per curiam) (trial court violated Texas Rule of Civil
    Procedure 87(1) by deviati[ng] from “required procedure” of providing forty-five days’ notice of
    hearing on motion to transfer). Accordingly, we deny the petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (court
    must deny petition if it determines relator is not entitled to relief sought).
    /Jason Boatright/
    JASON BOATRIGHT
    JUSTICE
    180881F.P05
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-18-00881-CV

Filed Date: 12/12/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/13/2018