Kyle Schubert v. APTCO Shell ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • VACATE and DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 1, 2017.
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-16-01129-CV
    KYLE SCHUBERT, Appellant
    V.
    APTCO SHELL, Appellee
    On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-04359-E
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Lang-Miers, Myers, and Boatright
    Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers
    This is an appeal from a judgment in an eviction suit. On APTCO Shell’s petition, the
    justice court awarded APTCO Shell possession of an apartment Kyle Schubert occupied and a
    monetary judgment. Schubert appealed by filing a statement of inability to pay six days after the
    justice court signed its judgment. Although the statement of inability to pay was due within five
    days after the judgment, the county court at law conducted a trial de novo. See TEX. R. CIV. P.
    510.9(a), (f), 510.10(c); Williams v. Schneiber, 
    148 S.W.3d 581
    , 583 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
    2004, no pet.) (county court lacks jurisdiction over untimely-filed appeal bond from justice
    court).    Like the justice court, the county court awarded APTCO Shell possession of the
    apartment and a monetary judgment. Schubert timely appealed from that judgment. However,
    because our jurisdiction over the merits of a case extends no further than that of the court from
    which the appeal is taken, and it appeared Schubert had not timely appealed from justice court to
    county court, we questioned whether we had jurisdiction over this appeal and requested the
    parties brief this issue. See Dallas Cty. Appraisal Dist. v. Funds Recovery, Inc., 
    887 S.W.2d 465
    ,
    468 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1994, writ denied). Although more than ten days have passed since we
    requested the briefing, we have received no response.           Because nothing in the record
    demonstrates Schubert timely appealed from justice court, the county court lacked jurisdiction
    over the case and we also lack jurisdiction. See 
    id. Accordingly, we
    vacate the county court’s
    judgment and dismiss the cause. See 
    id. /Elizabeth Lang-Miers/
                                                         ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS
    JUSTICE
    161129F.P05
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    KYLE SCHUBERT, Appellant                            On Appeal from the County Court at Law
    No. 5, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-16-01129-CV         V.                       Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-04359-E.
    Opinion delivered by Justice Lang-Miers.
    APTCO SHELL, Appellee                               Justices Myers and Boatright participating.
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we VACATE the judgment of
    County Court at Law No. 4 and DISMISS the case.
    Judgment entered this 1st day of February , 2017.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-16-01129-CV

Filed Date: 2/1/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/6/2017