Gray, Donald Lee ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                  WR-82,772-01
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Transmitted 3/17/2015 8:17:32 AM
    Accepted 3/19/2015 1:32:47 PM
    ABEL ACOSTA
    CLERK
    Nos. 82,772-01, 82,772-01 and 82,772-03
    RECEIVED
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    EX PARTE                           §           IN THE   COURT OF CRIMINAL
    3/19/2015
    ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK
    §
    DONALD LEE GRAY                    §           APPEALS OF TEXAS
    MOTION FOR REMAND
    To the Honorable Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals:
    Donald Gray, petitioner, respectfully asks the Court to remand to
    the district court for consideration of his affidavit confirming restraint.
    As explained in his brief, Gray seeks habeas relief from three
    convictions for improper photography, Penal Code section 21.15,
    declared unconstitutional by the Court last year. Gray’s continuing
    restraint affidavit was filed after the district court signed adverse
    findings and conclusions but before the record was send to the Court.
    Remand is appropriate to permit the district court to evaluate the
    affidavit. The State’s answer to the petition recognizes that the Court
    has held the statute unconstitutional and appears to concede the writ
    would be granted, but for the affidavit of restraint.
    Alternatively, in the interests of judicial economy, the Court can
    grant the writ on the basis of Gray’s affidavit. If denied, Gray would be
    1
    permitted to file a successor writ under section 4(a)(2) of article 11.07,
    the actual innocence provision. Section 4(a)(2) allows a successor writ if
    the individual is actually innocent of a Penal Code violation, without
    any other restrictions. Here, the improper photography statute has been
    declared unconstitutional and therefore any conviction would be void ab
    initio. It would seem, therefore, that he can satisfy section 4(a)(2). An
    example appears in Ex parte Knipp, 
    236 S.W.3d 214
    (Tex. Crim. App.
    2007), in which Court unanimously granted a successor writ under
    section 4(a)(2) on a double jeopardy claim that rendered the conviction
    invalid from inception. Gray’s position appears identical.
    Respectfully submitted this 16 day of
    March 2015,
    /s/ James W. Volberding
    ______________________________
    JAMES W. VOLBERDING
    SBN: 00786313
    First Place
    100 E. Ferguson Street
    Suite 500
    Tyler, Texas 75702
    (903) 597-6622
    (866) 398-6883 (fax)
    e-mail: jamesvolberding@gmail.com
    Counsel for Donald Lee Gray
    2
    Certificate of Compliance
    Pursuant to Rule 73.1(f), I hereby certify that this pleading
    contains 252 words, measured in MS Word for MAC version 14.3.6.
    /s/ James W. Volberding
    ____________________________________
    JAMES W. VOLBERDING
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this pleading has
    been delivered this 16 day of March 2015 to:
    Smith County District Attorney
    101 N. Broadway, Fourth Floor
    Tyler, TX 75702
    by the following means:
    _____            By U.S. Postal Service Certified Mail, R.R.R.
    _____            By First Class U.S. Mail
    _____            By Special Courier _______________________
    _X___            By Hand Delivery
    _____            By Fax before 5 p.m.
    _____            By Fax after 5 p.m.
    _X___            By Electronic Filing.
    /s/ James W. Volberding
    ____________________________________
    JAMES W. VOLBERDING
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-82,772-01

Filed Date: 3/19/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2016