Jimmy Aldana v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    January 9, 2019
    No. 04-18-00369-CR
    Jimmy ALDANA,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2017CR8138
    Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On January 7, 2018, appellant filed a pro se “emergency motion to strike the brief filed
    by appellate attorney and request extension [sic] of time and that case be sent back to trial court
    for the appointment of new appellate counsel.” In that motion, appellant contends his appointed
    appellate counsel was ineffective and asks that we abate the matter for appointment of new
    counsel.
    Our opinion in this appeal issued December 5, 2018. The time for filing a motion for
    rehearing or motion for en banc reconsideration has expired. See TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1 (stating
    deadline to file motion for rehearing is within 15 days after court of appeals’ judgment or order
    is rendered); 
    id. R. 49.8
    (stating court of appeals may extend time for filing rehearing or en banc
    reconsideration if party files proper motion for extension of time no later than 15 days after last
    date for filing rehearing or en banc reconsideration). Accordingly, we DENY AS MOOT
    appellant’s emergency motion.
    Appellant’s petition for discretionary review was due in the Texas Court of Criminal
    Appeals on January 4, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). An extension of time to file the
    petition may be filed on or before January 22, 2019. See 
    id. R. 68.2(c).
    In the event appellant is
    unable to timely file his petition by filing a timely extension, he may seek an out-of-time petition
    for discretionary review based on his appointed appellate counsel’s failure to provide him, in a
    timely manner, with a copy of this court’s opinion and judgment as required by Rule 48.4 and
    inform him of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. See 
    id. R. 48.4;
    see also
    Ex parte Owens, 
    206 S.W.3d 670
    (recognizing appellant may file post-conviction application for
    writ of habeas corpus seeking out-of-time petition for discretionary review when appellate
    counsel fails to inform appellant of right to file pro se petition for discretionary review).
    We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant and all counsel.
    We further order the clerk of this court to provide appellant with a copy of this court’s
    December 5, 2018 opinion and judgment.
    _________________________________
    Beth Watkins, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 9th day of January, 2019.
    ___________________________________
    KEITH E. HOTTLE,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-18-00369-CR

Filed Date: 1/9/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/10/2019