Mark Michael Richardson v. State ( 2018 )

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Mark Michael Richardson v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01-18-00945-CR
Trial court case number: 1557527
Trial court: 351st District Court of Harris County
Appellant pleaded guilty to the third-degree-felony offense of driving while intoxicated,
without an agreed recommendation from the State regarding punishment. We abate this appeal and
remand as follows.
The record contains a certification stating that the defendant waived his right of appeal.
The plea-bargain form also contains the standard language: “Further, I waive any right of appeal
which I may have should the court accept the foregoing plea bargain agreement between myself
and the prosecutor.” Nevertheless, the record does not show that the State gave any consideration
in return for appellant’s guilty plea. See Ex parte Broadway, 301 S.W.3d 694, 697–98 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2009).
The Rules of Appellate Procedure require us to dismiss an appeal unless a certification
showing that the appellant has the right to appeal has been made part of the record. See Tex. R.
App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The rules also provide that an amended trial court’s certification of the
defendant’s right to appeal correcting a defect or omission may be filed in the appellate court. See
Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(f), 34.5(c), 37.1. Further, when we have a record, we are obligated to review
the record to ascertain whether the certification is defective and, if it is defective, we must use
Rules 37.1 and 34.5(c) to obtain a correct certification. Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 614–15
(Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c), 37.1.
Accordingly, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further
proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall conduct a hearing within 20 days of the date of this
order at which a representative of the Harris County District Attorney’s Office. Appellant is not
currently represented by counsel, but he shall also be present for the hearing in person or, if
appellant is incarcerated, at the trial court’s discretion, appellant may participate in the hearing
by use of a closed-circuit video teleconferencing system that provides for a simultaneous
compressed full motion video and interactive communication of image and sound.
We direct the trial court to:
1) Make a finding regarding whether or not appellant has the right to appeal under Rule
25.2(a)(2)(A);
2) if necessary, execute an amended certification of appellant’s right to appeal;
3) make any other findings and recommendations the trial court deems appropriate; and
4) enter written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations as appropriate,
separate and apart from any docket sheet notations.
The trial court shall have a court reporter, or court recorder, record the hearing. The trial
court clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings,
recommendations, and orders with this Court within 35 days of the date of this order. The court
reporter is directed to file the reporter’s record of the hearing within 35 days of the date of this
order. If the hearing is conducted by video teleconference, a certified recording of the hearing
shall also be filed in this Court within 35 days of the date of this order.
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket.
The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket when records that comply with our
order are filed with the Clerk of this Court. The court coordinator of the trial court shall set a
hearing date and notify the parties.
It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: __/s/ Jennifer V. Caughey_______
 Acting individually  Acting for the Court
Date: __December 18, 2018____