in Re: City of Tatum, Texas ( 2019 )


Menu:
  •                                         NO. 12-18-00285-CV
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
    TYLER, TEXAS
    IN RE:                                                       §
    CITY OF TATUM, TEXAS,                                        §   ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    RELATOR                                                      §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    PER CURIAM
    Relator, the City of Tatum, Texas, filed this original proceeding to challenge an order
    authorizing pre-suit discovery under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202. On December 21, 2018,
    this Court conditionally granted Relator’s petition and directed Respondent, the Honorable J. Clay
    Gossett of the 4th District Court in Rusk County, Texas, to vacate his order granting the petition
    to perpetuate testimony filed by Real Party in Interest Linda C. Peterson. By an order signed on
    December 31, Respondent complied with this Court’s opinion and order, rendering this proceeding
    moot. Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We lift the stay
    of proceedings issued on October 23, 2018.
    Opinion delivered January 9, 2019.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
    (PUBLISH)
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    JUDGMENT
    JANUARY 9, 2019
    NO. 12-18-00285-CV
    CITY OF TATUM, TEXAS,
    Relator
    V.
    HON. J. CLAY GOSSETT,
    Respondent
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by City
    of Tatum, Texas; who is the relator in Cause No. 2018-205, pending on the docket of the 4th
    Judicial District Court of Rusk County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus having been
    filed herein on October 22, 2018, and the same having been duly considered, because it is the
    opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED
    and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, and the same is, hereby dismissed
    as moot.
    By per curiam opinion.
    Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 12-18-00285-CV

Filed Date: 1/9/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/11/2019