Burton Kahn v. Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. ( 2015 )

ACCEPTED
04-14-00569-CV
FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS
SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
2/5/2015 7:19:52 AM
KEITH HOTTLE
CLERK
04 -14 -00569- CV
FILED IN
4th COURT OF APPEALS
3Jn ~be C!Court 446 S.W.3d 41 (Tex.App.-Waco 2014) ................................................. 15
Avco Corp., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Div. ofAvco Corp. v.
Interstate Southwest, Ltd.,
251 S.W.3d 632, 662 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th] 2007, pet. denied) ............... 23
Avila v. St. Luke's Lutheran Hosp.,
948 S.W.2d 841, 858 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, pet. denied) ......... ... ........ 12
Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation Dist.,
925 S.W.2d 618, 629 (Tex. 1996) ........................................................ .11
Baxter v. Palmigiano,
425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976) ............................................................ 5, 19
Beaumont Bank, NA. v. Buller,
806 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Tex. 1991). ............ ..................... ... ............... 12,13
Bragg v. Edwards Aquifer Auth.,
71 S.W.3d 729, 734 (Tex. 2002) .......................................................... 11
Brown v. Bank of Galveston,
963 S.W.2d 511, 513 (Tex.1998) .......................................................... 15
Cent. Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. Islas,
228 S.W.3d 649, 651 (Tex.2007) ........................................................ .16
City ofHouston v. Williams,
353 S.W.3d 128, 133 (Tex. 2011). ............ ... ....... ........... ... ....... ............ 14
City ofKeller v. Wilson,
168 S.W.3d 802, 827 (Tex.2005) ......................................................... 16
EX Parte S.d.,
07-13-00168-cv (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1-15-2015) ......... ... ............... ... ........ 11
F.F.P. Operating Partners, L.P. v. Duenez,
237 S.W.3d 680, 683 (Tex. 2007) ... ... .................. ... ....... ........ ... ........... 11
lX
Gee v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,
765 S.W.2d 394, 396 (Tex. 1989)~ ....................................................... 26
Goldstein v. Comm 'n for Lawyer Discipline,
109 S.W.3d 810 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2003, pet. denied) ....... .................. ........ 12
Helena Chemical Company v. Wilkins,
47 S.W.3d 486 (Tex. 2001) ... ... .......... ........ ... .......... ........ ... .......... ..... 20
Holt Atherton Indus., Inc. v. Heine,
835 S.W.2d 80, 84 (Tex. 1992) .......................................................... 20
John Masek Corp. v. Davis,
848 S.W.2d 170, 173 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.]
1992, writ denied) ......................................................................... 16
Johnson Savage v. Fehrenkamp,
03-05-00060-cv (Tex.App.-Austin 4-2-2009) ......................................... 23
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II,
02-11-00373- CV (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth 12-31-2014) ................................ 20
LowvHenry,
221 S.W.3d 609, 617 (Tex.2007) ........................................................ 11
McCraw v. Maris,
828 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. 1992) ............................................................. 26
Nath V Texas Children's Hospital And
Baylor College OfMedicine,
12-0620 (Tex. 8-29-2014) ............... ... .......... ........ ... ....... ........... ... ..... 11
Oscar Luis Lopez v. Madel. of Texas,
200 S.W.3d 854 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006) ..................... ... ....... .............. .... 25
Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore,
439 U.S. 322, 813 331 (1979) ............................................................. 12
x
Powers v. M. L.,
14-09-00814-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 10-26-2010) ............... . .. ... 22
Saf Nat'l Cas. v. State,
01-07-00123-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 4-17-2008) .......................... 10
Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick,
724 S.W.2d 1 (Tex. 1986) ................................................. , .... 10,12,13,15
Smalley v. Smalley,
14-13-00717-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 6-12-2014) ........................ 14
State v. Shumate,
199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006) ... . .. .................. . ......... . ....... . ........... . 11
Szczepanik v. First S. Trust Co.,
883 S.W.2d 648, 649 (Tex. 1994) ...................................................... 20
Tanner v. Nationunde Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,
289 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Tex.2009) .................. . .. .......... . ....... . .. ............. 16
Tex. Dep 't ofPub. Safety v. Petta,
44 S.W.3d 575, 579 (Tex. 2001) ... .. .......... . .. ....... . .......... . .. ....... . ...... . ... 14
Texas Instruments, Inc. v. Teletron Energy Mgmt., Inc.,
877 S.W.2d 276, 279 (Tex. 1994) ... . .............................. . ....... . .. .......... 20
Texas TrunkR. Co. v. Jackson
22 S.W. 1030(Tex.1893) ................................................................. 20
Yarbrough's Dirt Pit, 65 S.W.3d at 216 ... . .. .................. . .. ....... . ............. 12
STATUTES AND RULES
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §10.001(2) ...... . .. .......... . ....... . .. .... 11,12
TEX. CIV, PRAC. & REM CODE ANN§ 10:1004(d) ......... . .. ...................... 11
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 41.004(a) (West 2008) ....................... 23
Xl
TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN.§ 312.002, .003 (West 2013) ...... ... ... ... .. .. ... ...... 11
TEX.R.APP.P. 8l(b)(l) ...... ............................................................. 26
TEX.R. Civ. P. 194.2 ...................................................................... 24
TEX.R. Civ. P. 301 ........................................................................ 15
Restatement (Second) ofJudgments § 13 ............ ... .......... ........ ... .......... 10
Xll
STATEMENT OF CASE
Nature the case this is an appeal arising a jury trial with a judgment in
favor of Appellee. 3CR 185.
Course ofproceeding. On November 4, 2013 Supp.A 1 CRl Helvetia
Asset Recovery Inc. ("Helvetia") filed the lawsuit giving rise to this appeal
claiming Puerto Verde Ltd. was owner of the shares of Helvetia Supp.A 1 CRl
and Burton Kahn, ("Kahn") breached his fiduciary duty. 1 CR5. On December 9
2014 to December 11, 2013 the temporary injunction hearing was conducted and
the temporary injunction order was signed on December 18, 2014 Supp.A 1
CR108. On March 3 and 4, 2014 a hearing was held for a Motion for
Sanctions. Appellee' s First Motion For Sanctions Supp.B 2CR121. On April 1,
2014, Judge Tanner signed a Final Judgment and Order of Sanctions against
Kahn and his attorney George, and found that Puerto Verde owned the stock in
Helvetia., Supp.A 3CR 229. Judge Tanner stated that ownership of Helvetia was
"a subject of a different type different of motion that is before me right now."
Supp.B 2RR20
On May 12, 2014 Jury trial started and on June 11, 2014 Final Judgment
signed by Judge Mery in favor of Appellee. 3R185.
Disposition Of The Case, Kahn filed his notice of appeal on August 7,
2014. 4CR 444.
X111
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
Appellant appeals final judgment of June 11, 2014. There is no dispute
regarding the Fourth Court of Appeals have appellate jurisdiction over this
matter .
.STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
Appellant does not believe that oral argument is necessary as the
arguments in brief hopefully will convince the Court to reverse the Judgment.
XlV
RECORD REFERENCES
The Reporter's Record will be cited as
follows:
[Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record on October 3, 2014
Supp. A [Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record on January 14, 2014
Supp.A Excerpts [Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record on January 14, 2014
EXHIBITS Supp.A EXH 1[page]
Supp. B [Vol.] RR [page] Reporter's Record Case Number 202 CI 18394
Appeal Number 04-14-00357 CV on May 23, 2013
EXHIBITS Supp.B lEXH [page]
The Clerk's Record will be cited as follows:
[Vol.] BCR [page] Clerks submission on October 3, 2014
Supp. A [Vol.] ACR [page] Clerks submission on January 14, 2014
Supp. B [Vol.] CCR [page] Clerks submission Case Number 202 CI 183 94
Appeal Number 04-14-00357 CV on May 23, 2013
Supp. C [Vol.] DCR [page] Clerks submission on --------December 5,, 2014
Supp. D [Vol.] ECR [page] Clerks submission on February 4, 2015
xv
ISSUES PRESENTED
ISSUE 1: The court abused its discretion by allowing Collateral Estoppel from the
Final Judgment and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares.
Issue 2: The court abused its discretion by denying appellant's JNOV because the
jury's answers were not based on the evidence presented.
Issue 3: The Court abused its discretion by not allowing any appellant's
witnesses to give testimony due to lack of detail in disclosure filed 6 days before
trial.
Issue 4: The court abused its discretion by striking Defendants' First Amended
Original Answer To Plaintiffs First Amended Original Petition And Application For
Permanent Injunction Relief, Afiinnative Defenses, Verified Denials, Third Party
Claims, And Motion To Show Authority.
Issue 5. The court abused its discretion by sustaining Appellee' s Motion To
Exclude Evidence Or Alternatively Motion In Limine.
iv
XVl
STATEMENTOF FACTS
BACKGROUND
Burton Kahn ("Kahn") ("Appellant") and John Ripley founded the Joabert
Development Company ("Joabert") in 2006, to develop and sell housing lots in
Northeast San Antonio. Appellant did all the work and John supplied the funds.
Supp.A EX lRR 7. Agreement was that John Ripley was to supply the funds and
the Appellant to do all of the day-to-day were which included purchasing of the
property, bookkeeping and control of the funds, engineering design subdivision,
coordination with government officials for approval and constructing the
infrastructure and roadway according to the approved plans.
Appellant never got any compensation for the eight years that he worked and
never took a salary. Supp.A 4RR44, Supp.A 3RR 114
John Ripley sold two shopping centers and the money went to a 1031 tax
evasion exchange company in California and then the Exchange Company returned
the funds (less commissions) to a Construction Corporation that Kahn owned
100%, in which Kahn spent the money working on the Joabert project. Supp.A
4RR 115
1
John Ripley had another development named Key Largo, but it had of Lis
Pendens on it and could not be used for funding. Supp.A 2RR 33
Kahn contacted an attorney Terry George ("George"), who did the
paperwork for foreclosure and formed Texas Corporation named Helvetia. Supp.A
5RR4
John Ripley owed Falcon International Bank for a construction loan on Key
Largo. Supp.A lRR 33
A Bahamian Corporation Maple Bush Holding Ltd ("Maple Bush") paid off
the note Falcon International Bank and then foreclosed on Key Largo. Supp.A
1RR34
Robert Ripley, brother of John Ripley testified he owned Maple Bush
Supp.A 2RR86 but his name is not on any of documents of Maple Bush Ltd, .
Supp.A 2RR103._ is a foreign Corporation not registered with the Secretary of
State. Supp.A 2RR 86
Key Largo, the foreclosed property was sold to a newly formed holding
corporation named Helvetia Asset Recovery, Inc. ("Helvetia"). 2RR88.
2
Funds were earmarked to be used to develop a subdivision known as Royal
Crest (Joabert Property) in North east San Antonio Texas .. Supp.A 1CR3,
Supp.A 3RR 80.
Helvetia was a conduit to accumulate funds for Joabert. In Helvetia's
original petition funds were earmarked to go to Joabert.. Supp.A lCR 3
The first phase of Joabert subdivision was within one month of completion,
the partnership ended and lawsuits began (August 26, 2013). Supp.A 3RR38
CLAIM OF OWNERSHIP
Robert Ripley, John's brother was not an owner of Joabert.. Supp.A
3RR97 wanted to take the Helvetia property for himself. On September 5, 2013
Robert Ripley sent Kahn an e-mail stating. Puerto Verde Ltd. a Bahamian
Corporation not registered with the Secretary of State . Supp.A 3RR 86 was
taking over.
Kahn realized that the shares of Helvetia had never been purchased and on
September 7, 2013 Kahn paid to Helvetia $1000 for the shares Supp.A lEXH
346-348
On September 16, 2013 John Ripley and Robert Ripley went to Randolph
Brooks Federal Credit Union and took approximately 50 pages of documents
3
showing that they own the shares in Helvetia Supp.A 3RR 81. The Bank did not
give them access.
On October 23, 2013, Puerto Verde Ltd. a Bahamian Corporation, claimed
to be a 100% stockholder of Helvetia filed a lawsuit 2013-CI-17516, Supp.A
lEXH 309-355 in the style of"Action on Fraudulent Lien on Property." Robert
Ripley swore that the documents in this suit were true, showing proof that Puerto
Verde Ltd. is the owner of Helvetia. The documents presented Minutes Of The
Organizational Meeting Of The Board Of Directors Of Helvetia Asset Recovery
Inc. For A For-Profit Corporation dated August 17, 2007. ("Original Minutes").
Supp.A lEXH 329-334. Note on the top of each page there is a signature space
for the custodian of records signed by Kenneth Moore ("Moore") the president
designated in the original minutes. Moore testified at the injunction hearing that
he was not the custodian of records Supp.A 4RR137 and only signed documents
once at closing on December 6, 2007 Supp.A 4RR 144 "Yes. That was the only
one time I did." Supp.A 4RR144 A stock certificate shows on page Supp.A
lEXH 335 that Kenneth Moore's signed the document three times but only
positive of the lower 2. Supp.A 4RR151 but on upper right Moore stated that's
not my signature Supp.A 4RR141-142 Moore later was not sure Supp.A
4RR150-151 Moore also testified that he did not issue any stock nor did collect
4
Moore also testified that he did not issue any stock nor did collect any money.
Supp.A 4RR136 The stock certificate was not the form with the Original Minutes.
Robert Ripley testified that he made one up on Pagemaker program and faxed the
form to his brother John Supp.A 4RR30. There are no fax identifications on the
certificate. The stock certificate stated that the Corporation's name was Puerto
Verde Inc. not Puerto Verde Ltd. The original motion in Case number 2013- CI -
18 394 Supp.B 1CRl describes the above conflicts before the injunction hearing
proved the allegations were correct.
Appellee was able to have Kahn's attorney a Jay Peterson sign a Rule 11
Agreement without Kahn's approval and eliminate the finding of Case 2013-CI-
183 94 for no apparent reason and waiving a jury trial. Kahn fired Peterson and
complaining that Peterson was either bribed or coerced. Supp.A 4RR83 There
was no statement or affidavit contradicting that accusation. This failure gives rise
to an inference that the evidence is unfavorable to Appellee, Baxter v. Palmigiano,
425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976). One of the compensations that Peterson got was a
finding in Final Judgment And Order Of Sanction "42. Helvetia has not sought
sanctions against the associate attorney, Mr. Petterson. Although Mr. Petterson
signed the offending pleading, Mr. Petterson attempted to rectify the error within
5
ten days by entering into the Rule 11 Agreement." Supp. B 3CR 249 Peterson
was not named in the sanction motion or order.
Judge Pozza stated that the Rule 11 was unenforceable Supp.A Excerpts
1RR102 however she signed the set aside of case 2013-CI-18394 without any
discussion or reason. Judge Tanner Notes at the sanction hearing sanctioned Kahn
for the attempted withdrawal of the Rule 11 Agreement. Supp.A 2CR22
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 9 WRING INSTRUCTIONS
On August 21, 2007 the Title Company sent Kahn an email wiring
instructions for the $1.2 million money trail exchange. Supp.B lEXH 30 Robert
Ripley took this document and crossed out sender and in his own handwriting that
stated "Please transfer 1.2 million USD to my escrow agent as outlined in these
instructions. The funds will be used to capitalize a Texas holding (-hold) co. and in
return Puerto Verde will receive 1000 shares. " This document was not given to
anybody. Robert Ripley testified that Scott Morrison ("Morrison") was the trust
officer for the Bahamian bank Supp.A 2RR 14 and Morrison asked about
ownership on October 22, 2013. Supp.A lEXH 39 and Robert Ripley didn't know
of it when he asked Kahn in Email dated February 18, 2014 Supp.A 1EXH61.
These instructions were never sent to Morrison but Morrison sent the transfer
funds. Supp. A 1EXH 36
6
Robert Ripley testified that the funds for the transfer came from the Ripley
family trust. Supp.A 2RR 12 Robert Ripley also testified that the funds for the
transfer a computer company. Supp.A 3RR 33 There are no Bank records of this
transfer and there are no records of the title company that this document was in
existence and was given or received. Robert Ripley testified that he owns both
Puerto Verde Ltd and Maple Bush are not registered Texas 2RR86 Robert Ripley
does not have the original stock certificate . Supp.A 3RR 88 nor the receipt from
the Title Company nor the minutes of the original meeting, that he claimed in his
affidavits of case 2013-CI-17516 and testimony previously cited above.
PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 39 ORGANIZTION KIT
In order to get the minutes timing and to correct the Inc. or Ltd. suffixes,,
Appellee submitted to the court Exhibit 39 Supp.A lEXH 381, which he called a
kit. Supp.A 2RR36-37Appellee claimed that was provided by Mr. Terry George.
Supp.A 2RR37 George testified that he never provided any copies to anyone but
Burt Kahn. Supp.A 5RR31 George testified that Exhibit 39 was not his work.
Supp.A 5RR32 Exhibit 39 was comprised of transmittal and instruction letter,
Supp.A lEXH 384, By laws Supp.A lEXH 391 and the initial meeting minutes
of August 8, 2,007. Supp.A lEXH 418 The transmittal does not have any
information on who has sent it nor a signature but it does state to review and call if
7
there are any changes. Supp.A lEXH 384, The bylaws and initial minutes has
George's signature on dated August 8, 2007 as if these documents are final. George
testified that the signatures looked like his but the documents were not the
documents George gave to Kahn. Supp.A 5RR31 The shares to be issued to
Puerto Verde, Inc. 1000. is written in pencil . Supp.A lEXH 420 Also per August
8, 2007 minutes state that George resigned as Director on August 8, 2007. Robert
testified that he received Exhibit 3 9 by courier in Canada but does not have any
envelope that it came in. Supp.A 3RR25 Ripley testified that this Exhibit 3 9 was
specially flown in to San Antonio from Canada for the injunction hearing. Supp.A
2RR39 The bylaws state in pencil the offices to be 6751 Walzem which is
different from the minutes of August 17, 2007 which has George' s address.
Supp.A EX 1RR231. Attorney George in his last words stated "39 0 I'm starting
to wonder about- about some criminal activity myself' Supp.A 5RR 32
On December 9 2014 to December 11, 2013 the temporary injunction
hearing was conducted and the temporary injunction order was signed on
December 18, 2014 Supp.A 1 CRl 08. The order stated that a trial on the
merits is to be held on May 12, 2014. 1 CRll 7. On March 3 and 4, 2014 a
hearing was held for a Motion for Sanctions. Appellee' s First Motion For
Sanctions. Supp.B 2 CR121 On April 1, 2014, Judge Tanner signed a Final
8
Judgment and Order of Sanctions against Kahn and his attorney George
Supp.B 3CR 229. Appellee added in findings that the ownership Puerto Verde
Ltd. even though Judge Tanner stated that ownership of Helvetia was "a subject of
a different type of motion that is before me right now." Supp.B 2RR20 Judge
Pozza Ordered trial on the merits of the lawsuit is set for May 12, 2014. Supp.A
1CR189
On May 12, 2014 Jury trial started and on June 11, 2014 Final Judgment
signed by Judge Mery 4 CR185.
SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT
The trial court abused its discretion by allowing collateral estoppel from a
sanction order that was being appealed de novo and prevented Appellant to present
a defense and having a fair trial. The judgment for Appellee without any evidence
from Appellee. Thus the trial should be reversed and remanded for a new trial.
ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES
ISSUEl
THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY ALLOWING COLLATERAL
ESTOPPEL FROM THE FINAL JUDGMENT AND SANCTION ORDER
DETERMINING THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SHARES OF HELVETIA.
The Appellee claimed in 2CR 263. Plaintiff Motion To Exclude
Evidence For Alternative The Motion In Limine, that the Final Judgment And
9
Sanction Order determined the ownership of the shares of Helvetia. Items 3,6,7,41
on 2CR266, 267,268 and 278 respectively. In the Supplemental Amended
Temporary Injunction Order dated December 18, 2013 Judge Pozza ordered a
trial on the merits of the lawsuit is set forth May 12, 2014. Supp.A 1 CRll 7
In Scurlock Oil Co. v. Smithwick, 724 S.W.2d I (Tex. 1986) states:
Therefore, we now adopt the rule of the Restatement
(Second) ofJudgments § 13, and hold that a judgment is
final for the purposes of issue and claim preclusion
"despite the taking of an appeal unless what is called an
appeal actually consists of a trial de novo." We overrule
Texas Trunk R. Co. v. Jackson and its progeny.
The sanction Order is on appeal and there are several issues that by law
require a review consisting of a trial de novo:
A.STATUTE REPRESENTNE PARTY
Appellant claims that a party cannot be charged monetary sanction under TEX.
CIV, PRAC. & REM CODE ANN§ 10:1004(d) \\hen the party is representative by
counsel. This is a legal issue and is to be reviewed de novo.
In Saf Nat'l Cas. v. State, 01-07-00123-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 4-
17-2008) states:
10
This case requires us to construe the meaning of a
statute. Because statutory interpretation is a question of
law, we employ a de novo standard of review. Bragg v.
Edwards Aquifer Auth., 71 S.W.3d 729, 734 (Tex. 2002).
If the language of a statute is not ambiguous, we must
give effect to the plain meaning of its words unless doing
so would lead to absurd results. See Barshop v. Medina
County Underground Water Conservation Dist., 925
S.W.2d 618, 629 (Tex. 1996)
InEX Parte S.d., 07-13-00168-cv (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1-15-2015) states:
When construing statutes, we use a de novo standard of
review, and our primary objective is to ascertain and give
effect to the Legislature's intent. TEX. GOV'T CODE
ANN. § 312.005 (West 2005). See F.F.P. Operating
Partners, L.P. v. Duenez, 237 S.W.3d 680, 683 (Tex.
2007). To discern that intent, we begin with the statute's
words. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 312.002, .003 (West
2013). See State v. Shumate, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex.
2006).
In NATH v. TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND BAYLOR COLLEGE OF
MEDICINE, 12-0620 (Tex. 8-29-2014) states:
"However, Chapter 10 provides that a claim that lacks a
legal or factual basis - without more - is sanctionable.
TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE§ 10.001 ~see also
Low, 221 S.W.3d at 617. Legally, the claim must be
warranted by existing law or a nonfrivolous argument to
change existing law. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
§ 10.001 (2). But Chapter 10 expressly prohibits monetary
sanctions against a represented party based on the legal
contentions in a pleading. Id. § 10.004(d) ("The court
11
may not award monetary sanctions again' st a represented
party for a violation of Section 10.001(2). ").
Accordingly, the trial court could not have properly
awarded sanctions against Nath for groundless legal
contentions in his tortuous interference claim."
In Goldstein v. Comm'nfor Lawyer Discipline, 109 S.W.3d 810 (Tex.App.-
Dallas 2003, pet. denied) stated:
"A trial court has broad discretion in determining
whether to allow a plaintiff to use collateral estoppel
offensively. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S.
322, 813 331 (1979); see also Scurlock Oil Co. v.
Smithwick, 724 S.W.2d 1, 7 (Tex. 1986) (citing Parklane
Hosiery with approval).
A trial court abuses its discretion only when its
action is arbitrary and unreasonable,without reference to
guiding rules or principles. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v.
Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223 , 226 (Tex. 1991). In
determining whether to apply collateral estoppel
offensively, the trial court must consider the Parklane
Hosiery factors. See ParklaneHosiery Co., 439 U.S. at
329-30; Yarbrough's Dirt Pit, 65 S.W.3d at 216.The first
factor is whether application of the doctrine will tend to
increase litigation by allowing a plaintiff to "wait and
see" before filing suit instead of joining in the prior
litigation. See Parklane Hosiery, 439 U.S. at 329-330;
see also Avila v. St. Luke's Lutheran Hosp., 948 S.W.2d
841 , 858 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, pet. denied).
Second, the offensive use of collateral estoppel may be
unfair under the circumstances of a particular case. Under
this factor, we consider the defendant's incentive in the
first action to vigorously defend the suit, or the
foreseeability of future suits, and the availability of
12
procedural safeguards in the second suit that were not
available in the first suit.
A trial court abuses its discretion only when its
action is arbitrary and unreasonable, without reference to
guiding rules or principles. Beaumont Bank, N.A. v.
Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223 , 226 (Tex. 1991).
In Plaintiffs first amended motion for sanctions , Plaintiff states that George
is also a representative party. Supp.B 2 CR1359 The trial court acted
unreasonable and without reference to guiding rules or principles when it did not
consider that the statute that monetary sanction under TEX. CIV, PRAC. & REM
CODE ANN § 10 :1004(d) \Wen the party is representative by counsel is a legal issue
and is to be reviewed de novo by Appellate court and that collateral estoppel is should not
allowed under In Scurlock Oil Co, supra.
B. SURJECTMATTERJURISDICTION
In the order of April 1, 2014 there are claims that Appellee owns the shares
of Helvetia in the dialog of the Order. These notations are the basis of Appellee' s
claim of ownership. During the sanction hearing(" SH") on March 3-4, 2014,,
Kahn requested a ruling on the foreign corporation issue but did not get one. Kahn
also stated" the issue in this particular case is who owns the stock along the
company" . The court replied, "well that's a subject of a different type of motion
that is before me right now is certainly a welcome to urge that to some court when
13
you file a proper motion." Thus the court declared that the ownership of the stock
was not in her subject matter jurisdiction. Supp.B 2RR20 In Smalley v. Smalley,
14-13-00717-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 6-12-2014) stated:
'Whether a trial court has subject matter jurisdiction is a
question of law we review de novo. City ofHouston v.
Williams, 353 S.W.3d 128, 133 (Tex. 2011).
The trial court acted unreasonable and without reference to guiding rules or
principles when it did not consider that subject matter jurisdiction is a question of
law that is reviewed de novo .
C. FULLY LITIGATED
The Sanction trial Judge Tanner declared that the issue of ownership was not
in her jurisdiction and did not litigate the ownership issue. Therefore collateral
estoppel cannot be allowed based on Final Judgment And Sanction Order because
facts sought to be litigated ( Ownership of the shares of Helvetia) were NOT were
fully and fairly litigated in the Sanction hearing as required by Tex. Dep't ofPub.
Safety v. Petta, 44 S.W.3d 575, 579 (Tex. 2001).
The trial judge allowance of collateral estoppel without fully litigated on the
issue of ownership of the shares of Helvetia was arbitrary and unreasonable,
without reference to guiding rules or principles.
14
CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 1
The findings found in the Final Judgment And Sanction Order dated April 1,
2014 should not allowed to be collateral estoppel based on Scurlock Oil Co. v.
Smithwick, supra and statutes. Based on the above this Honorable. Court of
Appeals should reverse judgment of June 11, 2014 and remand for new jury trial.
ISSUE 2
THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY DENYING
APPELLANT'S JNOV BECAUSE THE JURY'S ANSWERS WERE NOT
BASED ON THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED.
The court should grant a motion for new trial because the jury's answers are
not based on the evidence presented. Testimony was from Appellant Burton Kahn~
representing Appellee was Mary Guzman, Adam Smith, builder-contractor who
purchased lots from Helvetia~ and Amanda Tidmore a title person who guarantee
title for the sales purchase of the lots at Helvetia.
In American Alternative Ins. Corp. v. Davis, 446 S.W.3d 41 (Tex.App.-
Waco 2014) states:
A trial court may disregard a jury's verdict and render a
JNOV ifthere is no evidence to support the jury's
findings or if a directed verdict would have been proper.
Brown v. Bank of Galveston, 963 S.W.2d 511, 513
(Tex.1998)~ see TEX.R. Civ. P. 301. We review the trial
15
court's ruling on a motion for JNOV under a legal
sufficiency standard. See Tanner v. Nationunde Mut. Fire
Ins. Co., 289 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Tex.2009). We "credit
evidence favoring the jury verdict if reasonable jurors
could, and disregard contrary evidence unless reasonable
jurors could not." Cent. Ready Mix Concrete Co. v. Islas,
228 S.W.3d 649, 651 (Tex.2007). We must uphold the
jury's finding if more than a scintilla of competent
evidence supports it. Tanner, 289 S.W.3d at 830. "The
final test for legal sufficiency must always be whether the
evidence at trial would enable reasonable and fair-
minded people to reach the verdict under review." City of
Keller v. Wilson, 168 S.W.3d 802, 827 (Tex.2005). A
JNOV should be granted: (1) when the evidence is
conclusive, and one party is entitled to recover as a
matter of law; or (2) when a legal principle precludes
recovery. John Masek Corp. v. Davis, 848 S.W.2d 170,
173 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, writ denied).
QUESTION2
The Jury did not have evidence in regards to misappropriations of assets and
lost profits as described in Final Judgment. 3CR 185
MISAPPROPRIATIONS OF ASSETS
Misappropriations of assets $721 ,166.00.This comprised of $340,000.00 that
Kahn had used to transfer funds. 2RR 15. There is testimony by Kahn that these
funds are in this registry of the Court. 2RR 110, 2RR 111. There were questions on
the amount that was in the registry of the Court and it appeared confusing. It is the
16
culmination of the funds so that nothing was stolen. Powers says that the funds went
to the registry 4RR 142. There is no document, or motion or order claiming that the
funds that were placed in the registry of the court were not adequate. There was no
evidence showing that the $340,000 did not go into the registry of the court. The court
did not want the amount placed in the registry of the court to go to the jury 4RR 143
so that the only evidence is that the $340,000 went to the registry of the court.
Therefore these funds are not in the possession of Kahn and cannot be
construed to be misappropriated. The reality is that the funds were distributed as
per 3CR 41, 82
Loans to share holders $380,166.00 shown on income tax form were funds sent
to Joabert and used on the Royal Crest property. This information was forbidden to
get to the jury because of the Final Judgment And Sanction Order (collateral
estoppel ) There is no evidence that the funds went to Kahn, nor is there any
evidence that an actual loan was made to Kahn except the notation on the income
tax. The jury was instructed under definitions that Puerto Verde Ltd. was the sole
shareholder of Helvetia since 2007. 3CR193 This instruction has more weight than
the notation on the income tax without any verification and should be considered
that Puerto Verde Ltd is the shareholder and debtor. There is no evidence that
Burton Kahn made that loan. There were no loan documents papers nor was there
17
any indication of when this loan occurred. The complete bank records of Kahn
and all other corporations that Kahn controlled should show if Kahn received any
loan distribution. APPENDIX-EXHIBIT C. The representative of Helvetia, Ms.
Guzman did not present any evidence as to a loan. Ms. Guzman did not complain
that there was any misappropriations of any funds. Ms. Guzman, the only
representative officer of Helvetia only testified by reading what Robert Ripley said
and submitting Exhibit 9 the Robert Ripley handwritten note to Robert Ripley on
title companies e-mail. We only heard from how Werner Powers the attorney (non-
witness) for Helvetia in his closing arguments that it was Kahn misappropriated
funds. 4RR 142. There is no evidence of any loan documents. There is no evidence
that these funds went to Kahn.
No evidence of what happened in 2013? No evidence that the loan paid?
Kahn was prohibited from testifying anything about the Royal Crest Project or
Joabert. The reality theory that Joabert was the financier and the funds distributed
to Joabert was the stockholder loan stated on the income tax statement. Appellee
prevented Chris Kohn ("Kohn")the accountant, who authored the income tax
statement from testifying. Appellee did not call Kohn. The inference that no
information is given regarding the loan information shows that Appellee was
hiding something. This refusal or avoidance is tantamount to a taking a fifth
18
amendment exemption in a criminal case. This is a civil case. The Constitution
permits a trier of fact to draw such adverse inferences against a party in a civil
suit. Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308, 318 (1976).
There is no evidence showing that Kahn got funds from this loan.
LOST PROFITS
Mary Ripley Guzman ("Guzman"), the representative of Helvetia did not
produce any sales records and any lost sales. There is no evidence showing that there
were any lost profits. The testimony of Adam Smith ("Smith") the Builder claimed
that he had lost two sales in the period since the dispute. Smith stated he had sold 20
lots in this period, and usually loses I 0% of the sales 4RR 222 . (2 lost house sales)
Thus there were no lost sales and no lost profits. Adam Smith did not provide any
documentation to show that there were any lost profits. The calculation and non
testimony of attorney powers showing lost profits by using Amanda Tidmore
("Tidmore"), the title closer is not competent evidence. Tidmore claimed that she did
not close on 5 transactions 4RR208. She did not specify what type of transactions
nor did she know the lot numbers or whether those lots were sold to somebody else.
Tidmore did not purchase any lots. Tidmore only works for an insurance company,
who insures title. The person who would know, if there were lost sales of lots would
19
be Guzman, the representative of Helvetia. Since the dispute to the trial to June 1,
2014 in reality there were 36 homes sold in this. And last year same period there were
only 14 so there was no lost profits whatsoever with an additional $525,000 =/-
income to Helvetia. 3CR 91-394 (Sales per Bexar County Clerk)
In Helena Chemical Company v. Wilkins, 47 S.W.3d 486 (Tex. 2001) states:
Recovery for lost profits does not require that the loss be
susceptible to exact calculation. Texas Instruments, Inc.
v. Teletron Energy Mgmt., Inc., 877 S.W.2d 276, 279
(Tex. 1994). However, the injured party must do more
than show that it suffered some lost profits. Teletron
Energy Mgmt., Inc., 877 S.W.2d at 279. The loss amount
must be shown by competent evidence with reasonable
certainty. Szczepanik v. First S. Trust Co., 883 S.W.2d
648, 649 (Tex. 1994); Holt Atherton Indus., Inc. v. Heine,
835 S.W.2d 80, 84 (Tex. 1992). This is a fact-intensive
determination. Heine, 835 S.W.2d at 84. At a minimum,
opinions or lost-profit estimates must be based on
objective facts, figures, or data from which the lost-
profits amount may be ascertained. Szczepanik, 883
S.W.2d at 649; Heine, 835 S.W.2d at 84.
In a recent case JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Professional Pharmacy II,
02-11-00373- CV (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth 12-31-2014) reiterates the same facts.
Appellee did not provide any facts and documentation as per described in Helena
Chemical Company v. Wilkins, supra
Therefore there is no evidence of lost profits.
20
QUESTION 5.
The Jury did not have evidence in regards to Kahn held for Helvetia.
Misappropriations of assets $721 ,166.00. see Response Question 2
QUESTION?.
The Jury did not have evidence that any damages were caused by Kahn's
slander of Helvetia's title. There is no evidence of any lost profits by testimony of
Guzman or Smith. In fact an increase of over $525, 000 income.
Helvetia did not suffer any damages any lost profits and continued normal
operations. There is no evidence showing that there was any lost profits. The
testimony of Adam Smith the Builder claimed that he had lost two sales in the
period since the dispute. Adam Smith stated he had sold 20 lots in this period, and
usually loses I 0% of the sales that are not culminated. (2 lost lots sales) Thus there
were no lost sales and no lost profits. Adam Smith did not provide any
documentation to show that there was any lost profits. The calculation and non
testimony of attorney powers showing a was profits by using Amanda Tidmore, the
title closer is not competent evidence.
21
QUESTION9
The Jury did not have evidence for damages that Kahn's filing of a fraudulent
court record.
Helvetia did not suffer any damages any lost profits and continued normal
operations. There is no evidence showing that there was any lost profits. The
testimony of Adam Smith the Builder claimed that he had lost two sales in the
period since the dispute. Adam Smith stated he had sold 20 lots in this period, and
usually loses I 0% of the sales that are not culminated. (2 lost lots sales) Thus there
were no lost sales and no lost profits. Adam Smith did not provide any
documentation to show that there was any lost profits. The calculation and non
testimony of attorney powers showing a was profits by using Amanda Tidmore, the
title closer is not compete you evidence. The is no evidence for damages that
Kahn's filing of a fraudulent court record.
QUESTION 11
The Jury did not have evidence for exemplary damages due to the fact there
were no actual damages that Kahn has caused per Questions 2, 5, 7, &9. In
Powers v. M. L., 14-09-00814-cv (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 10-26-2010)
states:
22
Section 41.004(a) of the Texas Civil Practice and
Remedies Code precludes exemplary damages when no
actual damages are awarded. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.
Code Ann. § 41.004(a) (West 2008)~ see Avco Corp.,
Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Div. ofAvco
Corp. v. Interstate Southwest, Ltd., 251 S.W.3d 632, 662
(Tex. App.-Houston [14th] 2007, pet. denied) (citing
Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 41.004(a))
("Exemplary damages are not available unless the
plaintiff establishes that it sustained actual loss or injury
as the result of an underlying tort."). Accordingly, we
sustain appellant's first issue.[fn2]
QUESTION 14
There being no actual damages, attorney fees are not applicable. In Johnson
Savage v. Fehrenkamp, 03-05-00060-cv (Tex.App.-Austin 4-2-2009) states:
Precision Tune asserts that the attorneys' fee award was
improper because there was no finding of the actual
damages required to support such an award. We agree.
Therefore the attorney fees are not allowed.
CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 2
This Appellate Court should reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11,
2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits and
not allow Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment and Sanction Order
determining the ownership of the shares of Helvetia, because trial he court abused
23
its discretion by denying appellant's JNOV because the jury's answers were not
based on the evidence presented.
ISSUE 3
THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY NOT ALLOWING ANY
APPELLANT'S WITNESSES TO GIVE TESTIMONY DUE TO LACK OF
DETAIL IN DISCLOSURE FILED 6 DAYS BEFORE TRIAL.
Appellee filed a motion to exclude witnesses on May 6, 2014 2CR 230
complaining that disclosing over fifty new witness on the eve of trial and giving
nothing but a telephone number is trial by ambush. This is another LIE by
Appellee state to the court because Appellant filed this same list in January,
2014,and again in March 31, 2014. Each witness as a brief description (mainly
their title of who they are and from that title a connection to the project is shown.
Appellee had ample time to complain but chose to ambush Appellant. Tex. Civ. P.
194 .2 ( e) the name address telephone number of persons having knowledge of
relevant facts and a brief statement of each identified person connection to the case
with the case. The trial court ruled that the description was insufficient. 5 RR 87
The court abused its discretion by not allowing Appellant time to respond
to Appellee's claim of no knowledge which was another LIE.
The witness Tracy Plumber, Court Reporter was discussed in Defendants
Demand To Return Original Documents. The only original document was
24
allowed by request because of other investigations and document, Exhibit 39 was
specially marked as Exhibit 39-0 Supp.A 4RR 22, consisting of a transmittal
and instruction letter, By Laws and the Minutes Of The Organizational Meeting
Of The Board Of Directors Of Helvetia Asset Inc. A For Profit Corporation
dated August 8, 2007 Supp.A lEXH 381.
The original document of the handwritten self serving wiring instructions
Supp.A 1EXH 32, that was not sent to anyone was replaced by Appellee without
permission and not specially marked. The question was when the document was
signed and ink dating.
The possible witness FBI Agent Jenson who investigated Kahn due to
Appellee's false claim that Appellant stole $400,000. The possible rebuttal of
this witness in light of Appellant filing a complete accounting total compilation
El CR 1-32 which shows that Appellant is owed over $77,000.
In Oscar Luis Lopez v. Madel. ofTexas, 200 S.W.3d 854 (Tex.App.-Dallas
2006) states:
"Further, it would increase the opportunities for parties
- both plaintiff and defendant- to "sandbag" each
other in hopes of a favorable trial outcome based on the
disfavored practice of "trial by ambush." Accordingly,
we reverse the trial court's final judgment and remand
25
this cause for further proceedings consistent with this
opinion."
InMcCrawv. Maris, 828 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. 1992) states:
For the exclusion of evidence to constitute reversible
error, the complaining party must show (1) that the trial
court committed error and (2) that the error was
reasonably calculated to cause and probably did cause
rendition of an improper judgment. Gee v. Liberty Mut.
Ins. Co., 765 S.W.2d 394, 396 (Tex. 1989);
TEX.R.APP.P. 8l(b)(l).
CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 3
This Appellate Court should reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11,
2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits and
not allow Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment and Sanction Order
determining the ownership of the shares of Helvetia, because trial he Court abused
its discretion by not allowing any appellant's witnesses to give testimony due to
lack of detail in disclosure filed 6 days before trial.
ISSUE 4
THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY STRIKING DEFENDANTS' FIRST
AMENDED ORIGINAL ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED
ORIGINAL PETITION AND APPLICATION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION
RELIEF, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, VERIFIED DENIALS, THIRD PARTY
CLAIMS, AND MOTION TO SHOW AUTHORITY. Supp. C 1CRl
26
Appellee filed special exceptions on May 6, 2014. Supp.D lCR 1
Appellee Complained paragraph 3, that will a Kahn has no authority to
represent Helvetia and Paradiv Corporation because Kahn is not a licensed attorney.
Kahn agrees to that special exception.
Appellee Complained paragraph 4.
"4. To the extent the confusing allegations could be construed as some sort of
trial of right to property with respect to the stock of Helvetia, that dispute is
between Mr. Kahn and Puerto Verde, Ltd., the real owner of Helvetia. Mr. Kahn
has not sued Puerto Verde, Ltd., who is clearly an indispensable party in any
dispute concerning the ownership of stock. Accordingly, if this were such a
claim being asserted, it cannot be asserted for lack of an indispensable party."
These special exceptions forced Appellant to file an amended answer
eliminating Paradiv and include Puerto Verde as to defendant an indispensable
party. This again is trial by ambush. See Issue 3
The court found that the special sections did not require a repleading of the
answer. 2RR14 ."THE COURT: ... Now, I don't find that the first amended
original answer is in any way tied to special exceptions or elicited by special
27
exceptions. There's no question under the rules that it. is untimely filed. It is
stricken. That's the first thing. It is stricken."
CONCLUSION OF ISSUE 4
This decision was an abuse of discretion. The Special Exceptions forced
Appellant to Answer. The elimination of the amended answer did not allow
Appellant to bring in any evidence regarding Joabert and or Royal Crest
subdivision which was the main purpose of all the work and investment for all
those years. This ruling eliminated Appellant from having a defense and a fair
trial and is cause for this Honorable Appellate Court should reverse the trial
court's judgment of June 11 , 2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new
jury trial on the merits and not allow Collateral Estoppel from the Final Judgment
and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares of Helvetia.
ISSUE 5
THE COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY GRANTING APPELLEE' S
MOTION TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OR ALTERNATIVELY MOTION IN
LIMINE ON ALL ITEMS AND SUSTAINING ALL APPELLEE'S OBJECTIONS.
EACH ITEM OBJECTION FROM APPELLEE WAS SUSTAINED AND
DEPRIVED APPELLANT AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEFEND HIMSELF.
28
This issue is moot, if this Honorable Appellate Court sustains any of the
previous issues. If it affirms all previous issues then the claim that Appellant was not
allowed present financial documentation when Appellee was allowed to present to
the jury partial incomplete and out of context financial data. This allowed an unfair
trail and should A copulation of the financial data is in the Appendix as Exhibit A.
CONCLUSION
This Appellate Court should reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11,
2014 and remand this case to the trial court for a new jury trial on the merits based
on any one of the 5 issues presented.
PRAYER
For the reasons, Appellant prays that this Honorable Court of Appeals
reverse the trial court's judgment of June 11 , 2014 and remand this case to the
trial court for a new jury trial on the merits and not allow Collateral Estoppel from
the Final Judgment and Sanction Order determining the ownership of the shares of
Helvetia.
Respectfully submitted,
Burton Kahn. Pro-se
1706 Alpine Cir.,
San Antonio, TX 78248
glentrail@yahoo.com
29
Tel (210) 408-9199
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
Based on a word count run in Microsoft Word 2010 , this brief contains
6,388 words, excluding the caption, identity of the parties and counsel, statement
regarding oral argument, table of contents, index of authorities, statement of the
case, statement of issues presented, citations to record, signature, proof of service,
certificate of compliance, and appendix, pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 9.4.
Burton Kahn Pro-se
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a copy of this Motion was served on Appellee, Helvetia Asset
Recovery Inc. through counsel of record on February 5, 2015.by
Via Email Lisa. Barkley@haynesboone.com
Haynes and Boone LLP
Lisa Barkley
112 E. Pecan St. Suite 1200
San Antonio, TX 78205 - 1524
Via E-mail Werner.Powers @hayneshoone.com
Werner A. Powers
Natalie DuBose
Haynes & Boone, LLP
2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
Dallas, Texas 7 5219
~~
Burton Kahn
30
STATEOFTEXAS §
BEXAR COUNTY §
VERIFICATION
Before m~, the undersigned notary on this day personally appeared Burton
Kahn the affiant, a person whose identity is known to me. After I administered the
oath to affiant, affiant testified:
"My name is Burton Kahn I am overv 18 years of age, sound mind, and
capable of making this affidavit I have read the brief attached hereto. The facts
stated in a within my personal knowledge and are nd c
Sworn to and subscribed before me by Burton Kahn on February 4, 2015
~
Notary Public in and for
the State of Texas
My commission e x p i r e s -
31
APPENDIX
A. FINAL JUDGMENT AND JURY CHARGE
B. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §10.001(2)
C. FIINACIAL RECORDS TABULATION
32
EXHIBIT A
2~13CI~~~55 -0037
NO. 2013-Cl-18355
HELVETJA ASSET RECOVERY, INC. § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
§
Plaintiff, §
§
v. § BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
§
BURTON KAHN and §
PARADIV CORPORATION, §
§ 37
· DefendanJs. § 4Wth JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FINAL JUDGMENT
On May 12, 2014; the Court called this case for trial. Plaintiff Helvetia Asset Recovery,
Jnc. appeared through its attorneys and annou·nced ready for trial. Defendant Burton Kahn
appeared in person pro se and -announced ready for trial. Defendant Paradiv Corporation did not
appear except through Its director and officer, Burton Kahn, who is not licensed to practice law
in this state. The Court then empanelled and swore a jury consisting of twelve qualified jurors,
and the case proceeded to trial. At the close of the evidence, the Court submitted questions,
definitions, and instructions to the jury. On May 21, 2014, the jury returned its verdict. The
m
fl.-, Charge of the Court and the jury's verdict are attached hereto and are incorporated herein by
!
l
i reference. This Final Judgment expressly incorporates all findings of the jury for all purposes.
I
2 The jury's verdict was received, filed and entered of record. Plaintiff moved for
~I
J
il judgment on the verdict, and the Court, having considered ·the pleadings, the evidence, the jury
v verdict, and the applicable law, hereby renders Final Judgment on the verdict (the "Judgment")
0
L as follows:
4
~
Jt is ORDERED and DECREED that Plaintiff is declared the owner of the funds in the
9 registry of the Court that were deposited by Defendants pursuant to the Temporary Injunction
p
c;
8
8 FINAL JUDGMENT
5
previously entered herein, and that totaled, at the time of disbursement, the amount· of
/
$291,453.6 I.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover from Defendants Burton Kahn and Paradiv
Corporation the sum of $854, I 66 in actual damages, plus pre-judgment interest from November
4, 2013, at the rate of $117.0 I per day until the day before this Judgment is signed.
It is further ORDERED that Defendants receive a credit for sums Plaintiff received from
the registry of the Court in the amount of$291 ,453.6 1, said credit to be applied against the actual
damages and accrued interest as of the date the Judgment is signed. ·
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover from Defendant Burton Kahn exemplary
damages in the sum of$900,000.
It is further ORDERED and DECREED that Plaintiff recover its reasonable attorneys'
fees as allowed by the Texas Declaratory Judgment Act and pursuant to Chapter 12 of the Texas
Civil Practice & Remedies Code,§ 12.002(b)(3).
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover from Defendants Burton Kahn and Paradiv
Corporation attorneys' fees in the sum of $280,000. In the event of an appeal to the court of
appeals, Plaintiff, if successful, shaH recover an additional $20,000 in fees, and, if another appeal
is sought; Plaintiff shall recover another $10,000 in fees.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover all costs of court.
It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff recover on all amounts awarded herein post-
judgment interest at the highest lawful rate allowed by law as of the date of this Judgment until
paid.
Jt is further ORDERED that all amounts awarded herein, other than exemplary damages,
are jointly and severally owed by Defendants Burton Kahn and Paradiv Corporation.
FlNAL JUDGMENT Page2
lt is further ORDERED that Burton Kahn deliver and deposit into the registry of this
Court within the next 30 days any sums that he was previously ordered to deposit into the
registry of the Court and did not.
It is further ORDERED that Burton Kahn be and he is permanently enjoined from
conducting business in the name of the Plaintiff or in any way interfering with Plaintiff's
business activities, including but not limited to Plaintiff's sales of lots in the Key Largo
subdivision, based on any fact or circumstance that exists as of the date this Judgment is entered
or which has ever existed in the past.
It is further ORDERED that all writs and processes necessary or appropriate for the
enforcement or collection of this Judgment or the costs of court may issue as necessary.
All relief requested in this case and not expressly granted is denied. This Judgment
finally disposes of all claims and all parties and is an appealable Final Judgment.
SIGNED this// dayof~2014.
D-2273499_2
FINAL JUDGMENT Pagel
EXHIBIT A
1111 ff:~~~-11111.
\. . 201JC!t8335 -P00l91
. .. . ·~ . .. . - ··'
CAUSE NO. 2013-Cl-18355
HELVETIA ASSET RECOVERY. JNC•• IN THE DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff,
v. BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS
BURTON KAHN and
"PARADIV CORPORATION, §
Defendants. §. 407TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
JURY CHARGE
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN OF THE JURY:
After the cJosing arguments, you wiH go lo the jury room to decide the case 1 answer ·the
questions that are attached, and reach a verdict. You may.discuss the case with other jurors on Jy
when you are all together in the jury room.
Remember my previous instructions:
Do not dis<:uss the case with anyone else, either in person or by any other means.
Do not do any independent investigation about the case or conduct any research.
Do not look up any words in dictionaries or on the Internet
Do not post infonnalion about the case on the Internet.
q '
E1 Do not share any special knowledge or experiences with the other jurors.
/
'
Do not use your phone or any other electronic devfoe during your deliberations for any reason.
/
~,
Here arc the instructions for answering the qu~tions:
(. ,
(I
J J. Do not let bias, prejudice or sympathy play any part in your decision.
~i
• 2. · Base your answers only on the evidence admitted in court and on the law that is in
v
0
tbese instructions and questions. Do not consider or discuss any evidence that was not admitted
I- in the ~zm ~As ~
4 "'?!!' 3. Ya\.il~J33 rJ lJl~lSIO n
'\/ ( ).~~iii)!~~ W>I VHNOO
G . Cl~lJ .I ' • ~
lURYCHARGE ...)\ ~- Page I
0 Document
8 scanned as filed.
~
4. If jnstructions use a word in a way that is different from its ordjnary meaning, use
the meaning I give you, which will be a proper legal definition.
5. All the.questions and answers are important. No one should say that any question
or answer is not important.
6. Answer "Yes" or "No" to all questions unless you are told otherwise. A ''Yes"
answer must be based on a preponderance of the evidence (unless you are told otherwise).
Whenever a question requires an answer other than "Yes" or ''No," your answer must be based
on a preponderance of the evidence (unless you are told otherwise).
The term ''preponderance of the evidence" means the greater weight of credible evidence
presented in this case. If you do not find a preponderance of the evidence supports a "Yes"
answer, then answer "No." A preponderance of the evidence is not measured by the number of
witnesses or by the number of documents admitted in ·eviden~. For a fact to be proved by a
preponderance of the evidence. you must find that the fact is more likely true than not true.
7. Do not decide who you think should win before you answer the questions and
then just answer the questions to match your decision. Answer each question carefully without
considering who will win. Do not discuss or consider the effect your answers will have.
8. Do not answer questions by drawing straws or by any method of chance,
9. . Some questions might ask you for a dollar amount. Do not agree in advance to
decide on a dollar amount by adding up each juror's amount and then figuring the average.
10. Do not trade your answers. For examp1e, do not say, "I wiU answer this question
your way if you answer another question my way."
() l 1. The answers to the questions must be based on the decision of at least ten of the
g twelve jurors. The same ten jurors must agree on every answer. Do not agree to be bound by a
vote of anything less than ten jurors, even if it would be a majority.
i")'
As J have said before, if you do not follow these instructions, you will be guilty of juror
/·~ misconduct, and I might have to order a new trial and start this process over again. This will
waste your time and the parties' money, and would require the taxpayers of thjs county to pay for
9.,!~ another trial If a juror breaks any of these rules, tell that person to stop and report it to me
immediateJy.
v
0
L
4
2
7.
~~
g
p
Cl
JURY C!iAROE Page2
• I
Presiding Jui-or
1. When you go into the jury room to answer the questions, the first thing you wiJl need tO
do is choose a Presiding Juror.
2. The Presiding Juror has these duties:
a. Have the complete charge read aloud if it will be helpful to your deliberations;
b. Preside over your deliberations, meaning manage the discussions and see that you
follow these instructions;
c. Give written questions or comments to the bailiff who will give them to the judge;
·d. Write down the answers you agree on;
e. Get the signatures for the verdict certificate, and
f. Notify the baiHffthat you have reached a verdict.
Do you understand the duties ofthe Presiding Juror? If you do not, please telJ me now.
Instructions for Signing the Verdict Certificate
1. You may answer the questions on a vote of ten jurors. The same ten jurors must agree on
every answer in the charge. Th.is means you may not have one group oftenjurors agree
on one answer and a different group of ten jurors agree on another answer.
2. If ten jurors agree on every answer, those ten jurors sign the verdict.
3. If eleven jurors agree on every answer, those eleven jurors sign the verdict.
4. lf all twelve of you agree on every answer, you are unanimous and only the Presiding
Juror signs the verdict.
5. All jurors should deliberate on every question. You may end up with all twelve of you
agreeing on some answers, while only ten or eleven of you agree on other answers. But
when you sign the verdict, only those ten who agree on every answer will sign the
verdict.
Do you understand these instructions?. If you do not, please tell me now.
~f:1.,,7c
~OGE PRESIDING
·'
'
JURY CHARGE Page 3
. ·'
DEFINITIONS
You are instructed to use the following definitions' when the defined words appear in
specific questions or instructions.
I. "Helvetia" refers to the Plaintiff Helvetia Asset Recovery; Inc.
2. "Puerto Verde" refers to Helvetia's sole sharehokler, which is in ~ wholly
owned by Robert llipley,
-'<4! ~
3. ~ ••Kahn" refers to Defendant Burton Kahn.
ME:'. "I
I.(. ~ "Paradiv" refers to Defendant Paradiv Corporation
5. The "Rule 11 Agreement" refers to the document titled "Rule 11 Agreement" and
dated November 15, 2013. Tue Rule 11 Agreement is part of the evidence admitted by
the Court and is JabeJed Plaintiff's Ex. 35.
1!1
6
j
t2
t)
~J
v
0
L
JUR'Y CHARO£ Page4
QUESTION NO. l
Did Kahn fail to comply with his fiduciary duty to Helvetia?
You are instructed that Kahn owed a fiduciary duty to Helvetia to conduct its
affairs in the best interest of its sole shareholder, Puerto Verde, which was wholly
owned by Robert rupley.
Fwther, Kahn was obligated to place Helvetia;s ]nterests ahead of his own and not
to use his position for his personal gain at the expense of Helvetia.
Further, a fiduciary owes a duty of utmost loyalty, honesty, good faith and fairness.
Further; when one enters into a fiduciary relationship, he consents as a matter of law to
· bave his conduct measured by higher ethical standards than the standards that apply to
parties who are not in a fiduciary relationship.
Answer "Yes" or "No'.':
JURVCHARGI; Pages
QUESTION NO. 2
If you answered "Y~" to Question No. I, then answer the following question. Otherwise, do not
answer the followjng question.
What sum of money, if any, if paid now in cash, would fairly and reasonably compensate
Helvetia for its damages, if any, that were proximately caused by the conduct you found in
answer to Question No. l? ·
Answer in dollars and cents, if any:
1. Misappropriation, if any, of assets: $ 'ltl 16&>
2. Lost profits, if any: $ )3~ OOD
v
0
L
4
i
JURYCHAAOE Page6
- ., . I. .
QUESTION NO. 3
ls Kahn responsible for the conduct of Paradiv Corporation?
You are instructed that Kahn is responsible for the conduct of Para.div if Kahn used
Paradiv as a means of perpetrating a fraud for the direct personal benefit of Kahn.
"Fraud" in this context means the breach of some legal or equitable duty,
such as a fiduciary duty.
Answer "Yes" or "No;"
~1
j
/
·")
0"·
a
v
0
L
...4,
~
9
p
G
JURY CHAR.GE Page7
. ... .
QUESTION NO. 4
Did Kahn hold money which, in equity and good conscience, belonged to Helvetia?
Answer "Y.es" or "No:" -1ft. ~
. .... ,____
JURY CHARGE Page 8
g
4
l
. I .
QUESTION NO. 5
If you answered "Yes" to Question No.4, then answer the following 'question. Otherwise, do not
answer the following question.
What sum of money, if any, do you find that Kahn held that belonged to Helvetia?
Answer in dollars and cents, if any.
Amow1t:
G)
6
/
~I
/
~4
v
0
L
4
2
~
p
,
........
lURYCHAROF.
,.
Page 9
8
~
2
. I .. . ·. ·... .. .
QUESTlONNO. 6
Did Kahn slander Helvetia's title to lots in the "Key Largo" subdivision?
You are instructed that slander of title means a person acted deliberately and
without reasonable cause to publish false and disparaging words about Helvetia's
title to the "Key Largo•• subdivision lots, thereby causing a specific loss of a sale
or sales.
Answer "Yes" or "No:" \£.>
-Jff2'+<"'::;....._--
JURY CHARGE Page 10
..... ...
QUESTION.NO. 7
If you an8wered "Yes" to Question No. 6, then answer the following question. Otherwise, do not
answer the following question.
What damages, if any, do you find were caused by Kahn's slander ofHelvetia's title to the "Key
Largo" subdivision lots?
You are instructed that the amount of damages, if any, to be awarded should be
those damages which would compensate Helvetia for the .loss of any sale(s)
suffered as a result of the slander of title.
Answer in dollars and cents, if any.
Amount: l'?~f;t;Q
$ r s
8
Ei
/
t
fl
l
4
v
0
L
....4,
t.
3
9
~I
G
JURY· CHARGE Page 11
G
8
a
• I
QUESTION NO. 8
Did Kahn file a fraudulent court record or claim against real property owned by Helvetia?
You arc instructed that a fraudulent court record or claim means it was filed:
(1) with knowJedge that it was fraudulent,
(2) wi1h the intent that it be given legal effect as a court record or document
evidencing a valid claim or interest in real property, and
(3) with the intent to cause physical injury, financial injury. or mental anguish
or emotional distress.
Answer"Yes" ot "No:" fe2
~t,1·
J
7
I
al2
ll
JURY CHARGE Page 12
QUESTION NO. 9
If you answered nYes" to Question No. 8, then answer the following question. Otherwise, do not
answer the following questiofl.
What damages, if any, do you find were caused by Kahn's filing of a fraudulent court record or
claim against property owned by Helvetia?
Answer in dollars and cents, if any.
Amount:
q
.8
/
'
/
2
()
.~i
v
0
L
4
~i
/..
3
9
p
G
JURY CHARGE Page I3
I]
8
4
6
QUESTlON NQ. 10
Answer the following only if you unanimously answered "Yes" to Question No. 1 or Question
No.3_
Do you find by clear and convincing evidence that Kahn committed the conduct you found in
answer to Question No. 1 or Question No. 3 either maliciously, fraudulently or through gross
neglect?
To answer "Yes'' to this question your answer must be unanimous. You may
answer "No" if ten or more of you answer "No." Otherwise, do not answer the
question at al 1.
You are instructed that "clear and canvincing evidence" means the degree of
proof that produces a firm belief or conviction of the truth of the allegations
sought to be established. ·
"Malic.e" means a specific intent by a person to cause substantial injury or harm to
HeJvetia.
Answer "Yes" or "No: 1'
p
G
JURY CHAROE Page 14
8
8
4
7
QUESTION NO. l 1
Answer the following question only if you unanimously answered "Yes" to Question No. 10.
Otherwise do not answer the following question.
You are instructed that the answer for this question must be unanimous. Otherwise, do not
answer this question.
What sum of money, if any, do you find by clear and convincing evidence, if paid now in cash,
should be awarded to Helvetia as exemplary damages. if any.
You are instructed that "exemplary damages» means an amount that you may in
your discretion award as a penalty by way of punishment.
Factors to be considered in awarding exemplary damages, if any, are:
(I) the nature of the wrong;
(2) the character of the conduct involved;
(3) the degree of culpabillty;
(4) the situation and sensitivities of tile parties concerned;
(S) the extent to which such conduct offeods the public sense of justice
and Jlropriety;
(6) the Defendant's net worth.
Cl Answer in dollars and cents, if any.
t3
/
~I Amount:
l
~l
4
v
e
~9
p
G
JURY CHARGE Page 15
~
4
8
. I . I
Q_UESTION NO. 12
~
Answer the following question only if you unanimously answered "'Yes" to Question No. 11.
Othetwise do not answer the following question.
You are instructed that the answer for this question must be unanimous. Otherwise, do not
answer this question.
Do you find, by dear and convincing evidence, that Kahn conunitted theft, if any, of property
valued at $20,000 or greater? ·
You are instructed that "theft" means that a person unlawfully appropriates
property with the intent to deprive the owner of the property. Appropriating
property is unlawful if it is without the owner's effective consent.
A person acts with intent with respect to the nature of his conduct
or to a result of his conduct when it is the conscious objective or
desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result.
''Deprive" means to withhold property from the owner
permanent! y or for so extended a period of time .that a major
portion of the vallle or enjoyment of the property is lost to the
owner.
"'Owner" means one who has title to the property, possession of the
property, whether lawfuJ or not, or a greater right to possession of
the property than Kahn or Paradiv.
"Property" means: (a) real property; (b) tangible or intangible
personal property, including anything severed from land; or (c) a
document, including money, that represents or embodies anything
ofvalue.
"Consent" means assent in fact, whether express or implied.
"Effective consent" includes consent by a person legally
authorized to act for the O\mer. Consent is not effective if induced
by deception or coercion.
Answer "Yes" or "No:"
4
2
3
~~
p
G
JURY CHARGE Page 16
0
8
4
~'
·.,·.
QUESTION NO. 13.
,!< ~ ,.,,_
Answer the following question only if you unanimously answered "Y-esl' t<' Question No. 11,
Otherwise do not answer the following question.
You are instructed that the answer for this question must be unanimous. Otherwise, do not
answer this question.
Do you find, by clear and convincing evidence; that Kahn:
A. intentionally misapplied the following owned by Helvetia in a manner that involved.
substanlial risk of Joss to Helvetia:
a. money, or
b. lots in the "Key Largo" subdivision; and
B. that the value of the money or lots was $ 1,500 or greater?
You are instructed that "misapply" means a person deals with
property or money contrary to an agreement under which the
person hol<:Uthe property or money.
""(I{
Also; "substantial risk of Joss» means it is more likely than not that
loss wm occur.
A person acts with intent with respect to the nature of his conduct
or to a result of his conduct when it is the conscious objective or
desire to engage in the conduct or cause the result.
Answer ..Yes" .or "No:.., ~-+t;6~~--
JURY CliAR.OE Page !7
0
,
....~·
r·)
Cl
QUESTION NO. 14
What is a reasonable fee for the necessary services of Helvetia's attorneys in this case?
In determining a reasonable and necessary fee you may consider the following factors:
• the time and labor involved;
• the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved;
• the skiJJ required to perform the legal services properly;
• the likelihood that the acceptance of the particular employment will preclude
other employment by the lawyer;
• the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services;
• the amount involved and the results obtained;
• the time limitations imposed by the client or the circumstances;
• the nature and length of the professional relationship with the client
• the experience, reputation, and ability of the lawyer or lawyers performing the
services; and
• whether the fee is fixed or contingent on results obtained or uncertainty of
collection before the legal services have been rendered.
Answer with an amount for each of the following:
a. For preparation and trial: Answer:. s Jfl). D_QO
I
b. For an appeal to the Court of Appeals: Answer: $ .zqooo
c. For an appeal to the Supreme Court of Texas: Answer: $ lD., O{)J)
JuRv Cf-lAROc . Page 18
g
5
l
, • I
VERDICT CERTIFICATE
'Check one;
7 Our verdict is unanimous. All twelve of us hav
presiding juror has signed the certificate for a 1¥ ~
reed
lo each and every an;wer. The
'VL .
--- Our verdict is not unanimous.
have signed the certificate below.
us have agreed to each and every answer and
___ Our \•erdict is not unanimous. Ten of us have agreed to each and every answer and have
signed the certificate below.
Signature Name Printed
-J\·9·
AHlrJ30
I 0 :z Wd I Z H1'i ; ~
A1Nn03 HVX3B
>fijJl~ 1an.u-s10
J\JR Y CH/IRGE A3HNl'>f51-/ A\f~lf"fiNOa: ·· Page 19
0 0311J. ~
I •
8
5
~t
t.. Document
: scanned as filed. .. J
EXHIBITB
Texas Statutes
0 Texas Statutes
CJ CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
Ll TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL
CJ SUBTITLE A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Ll CHAPTER 10. SANCTIONS FOR FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS
§ 10.001 CIV. PRAC. & REM. Signing of Pleadings and Motions
The s i gn i ng o f a pl ead i ng or moti on as requ i red by t he Texas Rules o f
Ci v il Procedure con st itu t es a certificat e b y t he s i gna t ory tha t t o the
s i g na t ory ' s bes t knowledge , info rmat i on , and b elie f, forme d afte r
r easonab le inqu i ry :
(1 ) the pl e a d i ng or mo tion i s not be i ng pres ented f or any i mproper
pur pose , inc l uding to harass or to cause unnecessar y delay or needl ess
i nc r ease in the cost of liti ga t io n;
(2) e a ch c l a i m, def ense , o r other l e g a l con t en tion i n the p l eading o r
mot ion i s warran t ed by e xi s t i n g l aw or by a nonf r ivo l o u s argument for
t he e xtens i on , modi f i cati o n, or reversal of ex i s tin g law or t he
est ab l ishmen t o f new l aw ;
(3) each a l legat i o n or other fac t ual con t e ntion in t he pleadi ng or
motion has ev i denti ary support or , f or a spec ifi ca l ly i den tifi ed
a ll egat i on or f act ua l cont enti on , i s li ke l y t o h ave e vi den ti ary support
aft er a reasonable opportun i t y fo r fur ther i nvest i ga t ion or di scov ery;
a nd
( 4) each den i a l i n t he p l e a d i ng or mo tion o f a f ac tua l contenti on i s
war ranted o n t he evidence o r, f or a s p ec ifi ca lly i dent if ied den i a l, i s
reason ably based on a l ack o f i nf ormati o n or be li ef .
Added b y Ac t s 1 99 5, 7 4th Le g., ch . 1 37 , § 1, e f f . Sep t. 1 , 1 995 .
Texas Statutes
0 Texas Statutes
Ll CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES CODE
CJ TITLE 2. TRIAL, JUDGMENT, AND APPEAL
CJ SUBTITLE A. GENERAL PROVISIONS
Ll CHAPTER 10. SANCTIONS FOR FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS
§ 10.004 CIV. PRAC. & REM. Violation; sanction
(a) A c o urt t ha t d e t e rmines tha t a person has s igne d a pl e ad i ng or
mot i on in v io l a ti o n o f Sect i on 1 0 . 0 0 1 ma y impose a s ancti o n on the
p er son , a party represented by the p er son , o r b o th .
(b) The sanct i on mu st be l i mi ted to wha t i s suff i c i ent to dete r
repetit i o n o f the conduct or comp arab l e conduct by other s s imil arly
s i tuated .
(c ) A sanction may include a ny of the f o ll owing :
(1) a d i rect ive to the viola t or to perform, or refrai n f rom
performin g , a n act ;
(2 ) a n order t o pay a pena l ty i nt o court ; and
(3) a n o rder to pay to t he othe r party the a mount of the r easo n ab l e
expenses incurred by the o t her party bec ause o f t he f iling o f the
p l e ading or mot i o n , inc l ud i ng rea son a b l e attorney ' s f ees .
(d) The court may not award mo netary sancti o n s aga i nst a represen ted
p a r ty f or a v i o l at i on o f Section 10 . 00 1 (2 ) .
(e) The cour t ma y not award monetary sanctions on it s own i n itia tive
u n les s the court issues its o r der t o show cause before a vo luntary
dismis s al or settleme nt of the claims made by or against the party or the
pa rty ' s attorn ey who i s to b e sanction ed .
(f ) The fili ng o f a genera l den i a l under Ru l e 92 , Te xa s Ru l es o f Civ il
Procedur e , s ha ll not b e deemed a v i o l a tion of t h i s chapte r .
Ad ded by Acts 1995 , 7 4th Leg ., ch . 1 37 , § 1 , e ff . Sept . 1 , 1 995 .
EXHIBITC
EXHIBIT C
BANK ACCOUNTS
Summation Sheets
YEARS 2010 thru 2013
Banks are Falcon International Bank and
Randolph Brooks Credit Union
1. Combined Balance Sheet-Helvetia Joabert and Contour
Helvetia Account
Balance sheet for Income and Expenses for year and for bank
Check register per year per bank from bank statements. Information
carried to Balance sheet.
Joabert Account
Balance sheet for Income and Expenses for year and for bank
Check register per year per bank from bank statements. Information
carried to Balance sheet.
Contour Account
Balance sheet for Income and Expenses for year and for bank
Check register per year per bank from bank statements. Information
carried to Balance sheet.
- --·-·-···-----
BALANCE SHE '
CONTOUR iHELVETIA !JOABERT TOTAL
..
SALES 88,113.60 1,352, 332.39 20,571.26 1,461,017.25
.... ... ·----~- -~··-- - -·
~· .--·· -···- -···-··· ·-
- .. -·-· ...
TAX 17.528.78 178,744.49 72,130.34 268,403.61
JR 82,303.01 55,085.06 24,000.00 ·--
161,388.07
·····-----~
BK 599,995.00
UNKNOWN 4,866.86: 5,959.19 ~. q.~826. 05 :
SAVINGS ... ...
JOABERT 9721 -- . ------
CONTOUR 2918 --------
CONTOUR RBFCU --- !
HEL GOLD 7318 --
'HEL RBFCU :
---- -----
14412 HEL
. CONSTRUCTION 459,296.90 23,052.53 482,3-49.43
OFFICE EXPENSE 4,018.81 10,809.37 62,515.25 77,343.43
TRAIL 7318 123,000.00 ~ 123,000.00 !
BANK CHARGES -----·--- 326.49- .- - - - - - - 190.00 261.79 778.28:
PROFESSIONAL 5,060.00' 1,765.10 6,825.10
ENG 7,773.70
--
1.729,53
··~---
9,503.23
-·- f--
INSURANCE -·~o.~.~9- -- . ·-~ ···--· .. .... 30,0Ss.49
AUTO 584.75
-
7,692.30 s.217.05
IDEAL 240,000.00 240,000.00..
TOTAL 606,980.93 1,235,743.31 176,053.50 1,418,782.74
SALES 1.461,017.25
DIFFERENCE i
. - ... -----~-••-•ff•-·-·--·····--·
OIFF (42,234.51
! INITIAL CK AMONT..,.. JOABERT 275.98
ENO CK BALANCE HELVETIA -··- .. 614.17
.~--
··-·--··-
JR STOLE 22500.00
BK ACCOUNT ~- ~-
-_-18844. 36 .
CONTOURS FEE 10% 48234.94:
'CONTOURS OH 10% 48234.94
DUE BK 77625.52
-
··-··· .. -------...--
'' ...
-.-- ..·-··-· !
-M--
[---------- 1---
..
-· ...... -----
!
-·-·· - --·
HELVETIA ACCOUNT
I
1
I
!
~AT I2012F--120;3F . h~
.--.~-
1 !HELV
2
.___
3 20101
· -
T;: . 2013R8 SA\1MGS !TOTALS !ADJ--... AOJTOALS
4 lNCQME ..
·-
~
5
~ SALES
7 JmKSOURSE
921.86
766.00
38,i 108,954:47
287.24
sF:
381,118.
~t==-
I 14'.{gaool •12.. 1.32.01
759~,
. 1,352,332.39
. 1,833.14 {1,833.14
1,352,332.3_9.·
8 BK
9 #12 HEL
10 SAVINGS
·-
-
--·
,.
I ~·.
1~--·_ ·
_
7 900 00
·
..
. .
f · .
2<.000.00
...
I
1,068.~ ,000.00
i2.23a51 I 485.16=± s2i:!~.~~ csJi::~
~40,000
2.~.66
..oo ~0.000,00
cs.114.46 (3,645.a_g
I
1·==
11 7312 HGOLD .
12 JOABERT 9721 +~
-. . 40.000.00
. I. . . . . I 19.981
-,- ,
!_5~
~.·
13 DIV
rn·tNAT -
.
-· :
! . . . . 1. . . ~.
-
5.81.
~~-
130.53 156.32
·====+-~ 156.32 I
~. TOTPllNCOMI( 39,713.88 ~--+ 100.•204.41 M~,220.92 .· 486,29~925,742. .o8
109,241.1,. . 435,008,551 (576.8991711,348,842.SJ
.- ~ -~
I
19 OUTGOING . j . -_J _.
20
21 TAX . ----t· 18,770.70
2.2 ~. ----t. . 12.•0.00.00
. ~·
. 20.000 . 00 . 13,577.06.
J===- ~.
I ~· 9.soa.oo 1-..
-~·
159,9:g73.79 .
.
178,744.49
.55.• o. 85..oo.
·--._
___ 178,744.491
ss.085.06
23 BK ~. 3,579.82 . 12,081.64 s,714.46 (5,714.46
24 UNRNO~~ 2,100.00 4.ooo.oo -_ .. . .. · .. s,700.00 . . {1,BS3.14 4,866:86
=.
25. sAv1NGs
26 JOABERT 9721
·~~ p0N1'0UR 2918
2,400.00
. .
5,400.00
15,~.00
. /
153,692.4g3
_112,100.00
5,000.00
.·.
I. 120,000.00 .
460,000.oo
50,000.00 110,000.00.··.
4ao,ooo'.oo
166,49;!.43
467!100.00
. (521,401.51
.
(40,000.00
.
(61,401.s1
12",492."3
_467,1. 00.00
29 HEL GOLD 7312 150,000.00 . • I 150~ 150,000.00
~~ ~L I -~ . .. =t=2.,000.00 . ==---=+==. . 36,239:~7 I ~8;239.571 . . (7;950.00 . . 30,289.. 57
_32!CONSTRUCTlCN1·
33 OFFICE EXP .
34.··TR~l.L7318
:
.----;;n-nnf-. .
I
+ I
.
-~ . ~20,000.00
' .. - .. 1~~.427.50
50.00 • 10,759.37
1 . 23;052.531
.. 10,809,37
-
__ '
23,952.53
10,809~37
35j8ANKCHAR~ES/
· :
~+-- -r--: +-. . 3,ooo.oo . . 100.000.ool· 123,0.00.00 -- . .ti.000.00
ROFESSIQNAL
.
. , _ ·-r-
170.00_ _
. -+- ..+ ___
..
.
_ 190_.00. _ _ _J___ 190.00j
_i_ _
~~RANCE~±= - t== ==± i=-- .• . . .+= ===±=. I =
:~~
l!W~ .
. ..
I 39,450.52
. I~9.49
....<20:00
±==-±- . .~.29_2.57 I ~.925.127.91 ~76,89917~40.000.00
=± 10.000.00~~0. ,242.30
240.ooo.oof- _240,00o.ooi .
1.348,228.74
·43 DIFFEREN~E 263.34 (54,470.. 94
64,82.1.8.1 (10,000.. ooi 24,021.38 (24,021.36' __j_.. 614p --· 614.17.
_··--2·. ii
44 INITIAL CK AMO 0.00 263.34 65,065.15 10,614.21 24,021.38 _.l 0.00 614.17 614.17
m
~
-
. . ENDCKBALANC. __ ·--iss:-3_4
BANK BAl.ANCE .. .
OITION ..
1
263.34
0.00 I
65,08_6~15 1.0.614.21
65,08~.15
0.00
10,614.21
0.00
614.21
61_4.21
0.00 .
?4,021.38
2-4,021.38
o.oo.
-
t = '
0.00.
~~-00
0.00
614:17
.
------S-.14.17·1
--··
. 614.17 _ _ 61417 · - - 0.00
(000,
4 . . . . . .. ·-- _ _ .ERR
·--
HELVETIAF '*LCON ...
Date AMOUNT.... Payee WtREINCOI CLASS 0ei>0s1t ;who Bank cfutrge Interest Balance ··-
' -·~ .... - --~-
.-·-. --- .. - -·-- --····~-
2010 -1onainal Original ..
01/01 1432.00 TAX 19259.60 ADAM- 17827.60
-
01/01 1432.00 TAX -·- -· ···----·
16395.60
01/01 1432.00 TAX ---- 14963.60:
.. -- . ~-
~~
01/01 1432.00 TAX .. - .... - .. 13531.60
-·---
01/01 '1.432.00 TAX - -
12099.60 .
··---- - ......
01/01 1432.00 TAX .• ------- --
--~-
10667.oo
01/01 ..
1432.00 TAX ... .. .. 9235.~
!
01/01 1432~00 TAX 7803.60•
. .. . I -·· -- ... -
01/01 14~2.00 :TAX - ....
6371.60
---· :
01/01
01/01
1432.00 TAX
1432.00 ,TAX··· .
1432.00 1TAX
·--
-·
.. -
-···-
+- .... ...
4939:60
3501~6cf
2075.60
01/01 - ... - -··
'
2075.60
01/01
02101 1432.00 TAX
.........__
TAX
--
I
I
.. -· . -l--I
---·
643.60
- i
·-· .. ····-
643.60
02101 TAX
l
--- 643.60
02101 .. ··-
·-·
03/01 154.70 lAX -·
488.90
'"
03/01 I 488.90
04/01
... ---·- I i
-- - ···-
488.QO
-· .. ···-·
041'27 2579.82 TAX BK.TAX CEF TTOBEX 19668.26 ADAM i
17577.34
04/21 1000.00 9721 ...., .. -·-
16577.34
05105 12000.00 TXPMR
--- 286.00 UNK 4863.34
~D .. 4863:34
ERR
- .....
4863.34
·- ..
07/01 1000.00 -·9721 3863.34-
--
07/01 ... .- ··- -- --···
3863.34
07f01 - 3863.34
08/01 1000.00 BK - - -·--
2863.34;
08/01 ·· __ ~---·- --~·-·
2863.34
09101 - . 2863.34
!
09/01
·-·- - ·- --- 2863.34
·- ----
...... _g, if
2100:00 ! JOABERl
·-~.
10/01 '
--·-
: ... 163.34
11/01 163.34
- ··-·
12101 400:00 9721 ---···
S00.00 UNK ·--· -····
263.34
12101 263.34
39450.52
---- ---- .. - 197533.74
ERR .. I 39713.86 -· ·-··-··
i 263.34
··-· --- ..
39713.86 39713.86 ·--
"
; ... -,
... - ... -·
;
... --·-·----- ... ·-
38927.86 income
.. :
...
786.00 UNK -
·--. - ...
;
.BK ADV :
... - -·-~ . ·-·
------- ····-·-· ~. ... i
-- ··-····
39713.86 TOTALINCC 'ME '
..j_,_
~-·
...___ -- .. -·· --···· ..
}----..:.. ... -- -·--- EXPENSES
' ·-
. ·- - 21350.52 TAX .... ,_
·- i 12000.00 JR I
i UNK . -··-·
---·
...
·-
... -·- ·-· .. ··- 5100.00 9721·---·--- ··~
... ·--
1000.00 BK
-···~·. -~--
-· ·-·· -- .. .. .... -···
.,
---- ·-· 39450.52 -- ··-· ·--
•···-·
--39450.52
-0.00 ----··
HELVETIA t "LCON
Date AMOUNT Payee WIRE INCOI CiASS Depo$it Who Bank Charae interest Balance
!
- - · ___,___ _ _ -+----+------+------·=o.oo 0.00 · ------+--- 0.00
0.00
0.00 Origiri81
1--20-.-1-1-+---- · - - t ' - - - - · - - - j f - - - - - - - 1 - ··
Original 263.34
.. _.____ _
l - - = " " - - ' - - 1 · - · · - - - + - - - · - .. · · - + - - - - - - + - · - - - - 1 - - - · - - - j f - - - = - - - +~>-----+- ~
01/01 263.34
.........,,0-1/0=-1-+----+-----·+------<-----<>------ + - - - - - + - - - - - + - I 263.34
·-------···--+-----+----···-------i----·-·-+---+-----o-1
01/01
,______ _....___ _ _-+--··-· ~--+-----+-----+---···-·--+--~ - - - + - - - - - < - - - + - - -263.34
---<
01/01 263.34
01/01 '
- ------i--.,,2=0-1s"""2-
..1"'"3+SA:::-:-:-l=E,---·-+-------+---=20415.47
01/01 I -----'---·· • ~--!----··· ·--+-----t-··20415.47.
' 01!01 -+----->----'--·· -->----+---·--~----+-----+--- .. ?0415.47
-0-1/_0_1_____._______,__ _ ___,______-+-----t-----l>------+,-------t--· . 20415.47
- - - - ' - + - - - - - - > · · - - - - - - - - - - - · · - + - - - - - + - - · · · · - - + - - - - - - - ---+----+-···
01/01 20415.47
h-='--'---+-----1-------l------l·-···---------+---.. -+-----<---+--------=-1
01101 20415.47
01101 i 2().415..47
!-------,'--+-----+--- ---+------+--·- · · · - + - - - - + - - - - - + - · .. - · - - - + - -
01/01 20415.47
i--.,o-11-=o-1--+----+---~-----+------1----',-------+--·-- --+----+ - 20415.47
'-ow=-1~1-----200-00~.oo~+. J~L~R----+---··· · · --+-----1--- ··-+-----+ ------r---+-
·· · 415.47
-··----+---<··-
02/01 400.00 9721 10.47.
~1--+--'-'-'-'--+----1------·~-----<-----+------+---- 15..47
-----+------+-----+-·· ···---+-----+-----1· · - - - - - - + - · ·--+----=-'
03/01 i 15.47
0310_1_+------·+-----l--····---t----__.._----+-------r--------+--+-----o1=5.~47="'
04101 "287:34 ~i:r . 302.81
'--04/0--1----+------· ~-----+-------·-+----t-----i--~---1c-----+-- 302.81
' - - - ' ' - - - ' - - + - - - - - ! - - - - - - - - - + - - - - ..... ··- : - - - + - - - - + ----+----·-·-
04/01
~.o:-=51i-=-01.:....-1-----···+---------···· ·· --+----1----+-,- - - - + · · · · · - - - - - - +' 302.81
a02.a1
i-..:o=s=to:..:.1--1---------1--- -.....!-----+----- ·-· - - - - - - ·····-r-----1--·· --+------030~2.-=-071
1
0510.1 302. 81
0&01 -· - - - - ! - - - - + - - - ---+---"-t--------+----30~2.-81_,
05/01 ' _ _ __,__ _ __._ ... ---·--....----+----+-----
. ·-06/-01_.__ 302.81
302.81~
07/0...,..1--+---~------+---···· .. -----1.-2-11~9---5_.,..99--1-=A...,.,,S----+ ·- -·-,10-_-oo,..,_...._ _.,... __ 21488 70
07/01 -l------+-----1------<----= - - - - - + - - · · · .. 21488.70
07/01··· ------<--··-·--+-----+----- -----11------··--1-----+-·· .. 21488.70
J.._:0:.:..7/0::.:;..:..1--1------I------ ...._ _ __,__ _- + - - - - · · · - - - t - - - - · - - - + - - ! - - 21488.70
,__0-7/0~1--+------+-----+---· ~-----1-----;c------t----·· -···--.---t--~2-14~88-. 70
l---o-'-1-10.:..1-+----+----------"-,----+----1----+, ··----1------r----2,...,1,..,.488==-c.1=-10
i--:0:...71-=0.:..1--i------+-----+-----+-·-······-·i-E-R---+--··-·-·--+----·i __ 21~:.?Q.
~0:.....81:..:.0..:...1--l------·--+------1---··--·-+------+-----·~.----+--------r--- 21488.70
1-'----"o'--81-0-1-+---40-00-_-00~Y-N-K-NOW--.N--+- -· .. ·--+---1---2-191-5-.49-<-E-RR_O_R_·- • ·----=-10::--.0=0-r;- - - ... - 39394.19
~·
09/01 ' :
• .- ···--+----~---t---~f----••·r·---t-----+••----;---;o==-::-=<
39394.19
, 09iu1 39394.ll:t
J........:1'--0/0~1-+~1-5-00Q---.Q0-+---~29-1-8+----+----1-----1------+---- -T----t----c=24J--o=94:-::--:.1=19
1
~1-1;~0-1-+--..,.5"""00~0--=.oo=+--=97=2,._.1-+----+----1------1~--···- .....- - - - + - - 19394.19
12/01 -+-----t------=2~28~45-:48-t-o-NA~~F=G=---+----+----1-4-22-39-.6=1 1
i--:1.::;:21'.,:;c0"-1-+----+-----+-----+----+~22=545'--""-_·48~.~NA""'~~F='G~--+ · · · - - - + - - - ! · · · · · 66085;15
1------=...:c....-1--------l'--··-· ----+------l---"-
2013
1--~"--1~ .... ---..· - - - - + - - - - · · -----+----+--·- !
-----t---·- .- ·----;--------- ..
2013
1-----'--+-----+-~----~-------lf----+-----+·----+----··-·t-----r-----·· . -----
2013
c---2=0'-'-13=--if--fs.400.00. 22360J~.O.+----·==o=.~oo::===o:;.oo~...._..,,1()9~=24~1-.e~1~
___-:::_-:::_-:::_-:::_-:_o-._oo-~..._-___
__,_2~0~.o-o+---0.~oo-=-+----_-_-<
INCOME
-----+-----·-~ INCOME 108954.47
UNKAOD: 287:~,...,;----_._ __ ·-·---1----+-">----i
__________,__ _ __,__ _ __._T_OtAC. 109241.81 ·---r-----·
f----+------+------'-······ --+o-R=IG=·-,NA~.--2=53=-_~34.,-1----·--+------r--1-------1
--'------+=T=pT=Al,...,. IN 1~505.15. --------1--- ·-·· - . . - - - - - - ··-
,___ -t-----------+-,----+----;--~-----..,------;-----+ ------1---··-
~-----'------+---
~·---'------4---
~-----+-------+--- ···-+--- -··--
-- -·-
1-- • . . . . : - - - ' - - - - - · · ··--+----- ~-1-----+--- ····-
- - + - - - · --+----· +----
~···I ··--+---
i
--;.-,~~-+-'="==~c+-----r----··-· -+'------
.... ..
HELVEl'i4. .FALCON
Date Checl< No Payee ·WtREINCC CLASS
·- Oeposif Who
..
Bank Cha Interest Balance
r---;-- I
.. ··-
... -- .. --·
2012 OriQinal Original 65085.15
01/01 .A 20442.82' 85527.97
··- ·--
01/01 'F 22834.95 I 108362.92
01/01
- 136383.57
A
-- ' 28030'.65 ~
-··
10.00
01/01 F ; 47205.62 10,00 183579.19
01/01
- 1694.28 9,721.00
-
10.00 181874.91
.. ---
01/01 2870.-48 9,721.00 ...
17900.(43
-·
01/01 43919.65 9,721.00 '' 135684.78
... . ..
01101 257.82 9,721.00 I
... 134826.96
- ·-
01/01 712.39 : 9, 721.00 134114.57
01/01 1237.81 9,721,00.
- 132876.76
·-· --
01[01 4000.00 9,721.00 -·
128B76.76
01101 12000.00 9,721.00 10.00 - .
116866.76
01/01 14000.00 2,918.00 102866.76
··---
02101 ·A 30414.16: 10.00 133270.92
!
----
02/01 F ...23548.50 3850.00 4412.00· 10.00 160659.42.
02101 4000.00 9,721.00. .. . 158860.42
03/01 150000.00 7,312.00 6659.42
03/01 1500.00 2,918.QO
--
5159.42
04/01 F 47104.77
·-
---··
10.00 52254.19
04/01 A 28457.90 ... .. 10.00.
.. "
80702.09
04/01 6600.00. 2,918.00 --·- -- ---
74102.09
05101 'F 47153.62 10.00 121245.71
05101 F 23616:86
-- - 10.00
·-
144852.57
051'01 F 23616:86
'" ' 10.00
··-' ... ...
168459.43
05/01 F ..
23633.49 .. 10.00 192082.92
05/01 3000.00 9,721.00 -·
189082.92
-·-·
06/01 21058.35 .. 10~00 210131.27
06/01 5000.00 9,12·1.oo 205131.27
···-
06/01 ~
20000.00 9,721.00 ---------
20000.00 9121:00· -·
205131.27
06101 20000.00 9!721.00 -- 20000.00 .. 9721.00. .. 205131.27;
06/01 20000.00 9,721.00. 185131.27
07f01 150000.00 2,918.00
-- 3513127
-· ... . ..
07101 ·- --. -
35131.27
07/01 35131.27
08101 5000.00 9,721.00
--- -
-··
!
..
30131.27
08/01 .. 9500.00 JLR - . - -- 4000 - . 20691~27
09/01 4077.06 JLR TXPMR
-· -- ·-
16514.21 ,
09101 10000.00 9.72LOO -· -- 4100.00 4412.00 .. ...
10614.21
10/01 10614.21
·····- ···- ·- ~
-
11/01 10614.21
12/01
-·-·. - .1.0614.21
- .. ..
12/01 I
- 10614.21
489369.49 387116.55 ... 47950.00
--.
170.00
.. - ... .. '
'
····· .. -. ----- .. -. -----
.HElVETI 4.41200 M7.111J°!55 income
- -·
JOABER 153692.43 9,721.00 --~.ooo.ocf 9721.00 initial ---
HELGOL - .112100.oo· 2,91a."60 7,950.00 4412 HEL
•· - ...
.. -
13577,0S jj_R:--~--- -··
435,068.55 TOTAL ·--- -· I
150000.00 7.312.00 ~89.369.49 SPENT
170.00 BC
·-
-. .. I
f . I'" ......... P
489369.49 TOTAL E
9721
489;539.49 TOTAL SP NT
i (54,470.94 BAL
65,085.15 INITIAL ~
----·· -1
I
I loK . ..
10,614.21 BANK ~n:~EMENT_L__
.. i
I _J
.... ~-·· - ---r--·· ---,
---+- ---~!· · - - u•'- •••"••'·-~ .. •• - "•• --~
D0p~,9-offT9 l
SAVINGS .. ~---~---·------- -- -- - - + - - - - · .. ····· · - - - - + - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - ·
'JOABERT 9721 ----+----- - -· ··- - - - · ...
- - - 1 - - - - - -.. - . ·- -
.
-~----
CONTOUR 2918 ....... - - - - - - - + - - - ----- :~j4',000.00 (4 000 00
HELGoLD 131s
CONSTRUq~_O_N+---c-~·. ·-
(1,ooo:Oo}
.1... . .. -~--+---\---:-- ___'
1
.~----····-~-----··-~~- · -- • +-.--'-f1~:0~00:001
-+-----·· .. .P_ _.
OFFICF EXP H.394:88: (7:922.31 . (28.~?_Q..04}. (13.a2a,02 . "'"'·-+--- .. (?_3-.~1)5.25~
·fAAil731a···
-BANK CHARGES
. --..i PROFESSIONA,....,...1-+---
AUTO · · · - - -
· - - - . ------
ENG
. ---···· · · - - ' " - · - - - - ..
TOTAL (8,090.98 '_:_(2·(-080:85 (111_,257,38 (29,_~7iL29 TOTAL ·-·----+-~(1__7?.!..003.so
1
....
...
...
1
~
F= _111.!0UNT
iJOARftT.-P"1-c~N
~are"~..
:
-~~~E
.,. ____ r - ·
iNCOl Clfl!J!l !~It _ WtiO
~:nkC~_~!]lnte~E.J;ll~~~~~-]
ERR _'.__ _____ E.RR~
-~~: _ /- __ . --------~=~--- ----- ---, . - ______ -~~t~ dngioal . -·- ---- -~~:.:
--oji01 1320,90 AlBERTUESTf TAX .J_ 5000,00 4412 ------ -- ,, -----· 18329.37
O~I01 Jf3~00 RB AUHJ , --- ------· ··1iS01tf31
02101 --45s:sg CAP EXP . r------.,-·-+-~-+-------+·--- ""17557.78
02iOf-- --· 7320;62 ALBERT UESTI TAX- .. ----- i .. ------- 10237.16
02101 --- -- 313.00 i RQ l\UTO . ~- . . 0,024.16
02101 ··-f- 975A71 CAP .....EXP- . ------------+-----,8='="'94i[69
. 02/01 "'1"2""'s-_o,...,,o+B-EXA-·
_......,_.-R----l=TAX---+---- 8820.69
· 03101 s13.oo RB ___ ·- · Atiro · -+----+--- asof69
03/01 4811.93 CAP .----· EXP 3695.76 !
04/01 313~00 RB _,_A_U_T-.0-+-----------•····· ~··--·---- ----+--- ·--·· 3382~W
04101 31 f5.23 CAP- EXP _.!l! r .. --------267.53:
>--04l0
__ 1 --+----J.~0:_-00-+-5-AN-K----+-5-C--+---- . _ ... ---o-~-=-...,_"=-·•iii~~-+-----t- _____ zy.s3
05/01 325.00 TCEQ TAX 5000.00 :"f312.00 ! 4912. 53
- =g~=:=-,-~c. . --+---=~=~;;-'i~=,~g=._1-";e..... --------i?'·_-~=~~·:+-----~~~~~-- 7a12 00 ----~+-~-------+------~i~=-~~::-=;=-'
!
··-osiiH .. 1427.65 CAP EXP ............ . . -·· .... -- --·1649.3i
~-07~/0~1---1---3-13-.00-+-RB-~----·--+-A-U~T___,O_- - - - + - - -_ __,________ ·- -: . 7336.38
01ro1 lm;iJ)ff CAP EXP · '->--- .· • · .. --- ·-· ----1·--0--.,-0-.1--<3
j Q?_IQ1 --1450.00 CAP EXP - --- . --- -- . --- --6006-:73
: 08/01 313,00 RB AUTC ----- - - - - - - - - - - - 4693.73l
r-t 09101
08101 104-.75ALBERT.iJ"i;Sii TAX .
313.00 .RB ... ~--·----_"---ct-.oA""UT"=~c=1------+-------t----·--··--·····--1 .... .. -· -- --···-------
45iAu"
4275.98
; 09101 -----4odo.O() ~OONTOUR·---·-29ra -- -----------~---+----- - - . ..) 275.98
,,.-
~o9/""1·--;--2=s=a=7-4-:--.2=0:-t--------1--;,..,...,."*C"'.'"....
..,+------
--(jg/(f1 TAX .·- 9199.27 ORIGINAl START 14ss~~'= =~=_1_465~~2.T
EXP -.. T13328.02 S312.00; 10000.00 ... :
--- ...... · · ·--··-- Aifto . · --~--2s11.oo . ___ - . 44121 5000.00
2916 ! Al\IV\. ,oo·.·. . . !
- - - + - - - - - · - . - ...... ,.... -··· ···----··--,- ··-·.--- ..---- .... --·- .~.:--1~-"tUV-'--V-".--'-+----~-----~ =-::c--o=+---+-·-__j
- ... .,.. ------ - - · - - - - - - - - -----
BC
------~----- --
------'-~·
30.00 .TOTAL H 29650.27-~--=-..-l--+----~
·SPENT 29374.29
'~-~-----"-r------.-J=o=A=s=1:ft==T=FA=L:--:c=o=·N:.---------~=~~~~ '---~·-='-·_:_·~~~ ~=~·- ~ . .-... ._-_.-..
~,
2012
:_Payee_____________ ·-"-1---------AMOUNT Check TRANSFERS FROM Bank c lntere Balance i
I s ROMO TAX RC TAX 2870.48
--'------1---1--~---+-___:.--1---.-;"------"---+------
1194 2,870.4$ 4412 ,____ ____._____ _1800.49
• S ROMO TAX Kl TAX 4391QR5 1195 43,9.1965 441? 1R004~
:·s·RoMo-tAX JD~- ---JR___ 2000.00 ___ Jt~- _,____. __2_5,-'_.1._s2-+-·___4__41__2 _____ -~-~----441_:69__
I SROMOTAXRC TAX 712.39 1'197 712.39 4412 1 -441.69
S ROMO TAX RC Tl\X 1109 1 1237.91 4412 706.12
S ROMO TAX RC TAX
1------1--1------cc--+--~;._
1237.81 1199 4,000.00
..___ . -· _____,:.:_____c....--!---·--
4412 ------~---1-~
3558.31
TXPMR JLR JR 1500.00
1------+-----+----------.--+-----'>---'----~--------L-.--;...____
1200 12,000.00 4412 .. --- . -- ---
14058.31
NBP ENG 200:_66__,___1_31_3-1--_ _ _..____._ _______ ·----- ---·---- ~ 13657.43
CITY BANK
.,,_____ i EXP 200.00 5640- 1 - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - - + - 13657.43
CAP l EXP 481.02 13176.41
1----~--·- --~----i----- .:. ..·,.-----+----+----+-----+----+---+-----=-'--cc-~
CAP 1
EXP 192. 92 1 12983.49
· - - - - - · - - ·.....__-+-------- "·-·---=--::-:--::-::-+----,--,--,-+------+-----!-----+---+-,,_..,,-----,-I
BRUCE KAHN : ENG 300.00 1201 12683.49
. -· .. --"·--.NBP------:--ENG 40.16 1202 I
.<'.
-. C----· - - - -
•.
- ·-·····- ·- 1264!. 33
CITY BANK EXP 200.00
1----.,....,.--::'-c-:~~~-c--+----------=+----"t-----'---
56411 4,000.00
... - - L--.:..
4412 ! 30.75 16412.58
CITY BANK EXP 6755. 75 ; 9656.83
--- -CITY BANK EXP 6111.12 --~-----------··· -- ... . ..... -- ·-. ------~--·--·--+-3-54-5.-71.c.....i
_____g~ :~~-~ ·_ _ :~-~:· ··--=-!i-=...:o'~-~.o...=c:~=-o..__ ____._+____-__ =--- ------'--!
... -....-.....- .. ----·-'-----'--·--'-_-_-_-~;~:1~·
,---. RBFUC AUTO 313.00"-+··---+------l------1-----+---+---?R004Q
·----clriBANK- EXP 86.0!} ·- ·-·····-·--·-·------········· -· ·- ·---~--·---i---+---2-604-.4--10
---CITY-BANK ...... -EX_P. . . .--8'-60-.94--'--1----1---------- .... -.. ---- 1743.46
-----'---+----1-------'-'-----~---+---~---j-
IHS CONSULTING l:NG 288.00 1316 ' 1~55 ..if6
. . ·EN~·~G'---IN_E..,,._E-Rl-N-+--CE~NG-"-+--3~9-7.50--+- _,.f316 · - - - - - 1 - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - _
5;-Y"E=- =·- 1057.96 I
NBP
,___ _ _ _ _,___,_____ _
ENG 39.40 - .1~31-7-+------1--------4----- '
___._~____, ______ ·-~··--··----+-·---+---+----
1018.56. 1 ,.J
C03A TAX, 100.00' 1Hi2 , 916.~0,
:--CIWBANR---~- EXP ! - 241.58 ----+-I-6-7-6:-98--i
, CITY BANK EXP; -29if37 --~---- -- --· 1
386.61
CITY BANK EXP ------l~r.u-9-1----+------!.--,- ·-- . ·- -~....... - + - ;-~--:>2=-<·
1
1-_ _ R_B_F_U_-c_. . _._._.-l-A_U_T_0+--,_3_1_3_.o_o-1---- - ~---·.... _·-_-_-----·-=--=--=--=--=--=-·=--=--=:,:======-·-_:~--:.·· . -46.52.
__· ___
RBFUC AUTO' 313.00 154.59 -421.07 i
NBP- -- -· ENG 1 __ 79.29. 1153 3,.000.00; 4412 2499.73 i
liisl.J~NCE o~.~_A__.__Au_r_o-+--_s_19_.s_o_,___·'--11__·54_-_· ::~-------'------+----+_.. _ ._ ..__+_,....___..1. : _98=-=o=.2=--13:
1980.23 i
r----------·- .-.. -·-+-__c_B~'---+----+---s~.o~oo-··~oo_·~-- 4412 .. _ .. ... _ 6980.23 1
CB , 20,000.00: 4412 ! 26980~23
1--------l--r.-'-_;RT--""".- 20,{)0000· U12 ! 46980.2~
t---------+--o.------+-··-··'"-~-L-- ---------=-~+----+---+--'c--~
CB 20,000.00' 4412 86980.23
~---------1--c-==a-·+------+-!--t---(2-o-'-~o-oo-.-oo->i _ _ _4_4--'-12-+-------+---l--4--59-a-o-.23---1
l----A..,,_,H----+-A-U_T_O+---a-1-a-.00-·•. -,-1-1.-66--"·1----:...:...(2-0-,0-00-.0-0-'+)---4-4_1_2-1--.. ~-.-- --·-. ____ ,___26667.23;
t--C_H_A_S_E_B_AN~~KJLR JR 20,000.00' 1318 --·-44:r2 I 6667.23 i
' -BANKCHARG EXP ' 1151 -- -··-·-·---1------+---6·.·35'···· .... .. 666tf87;
Cl~F~B~ ~~--~..- +-;A_~X-~P-'- _~-+------=-~~-;-:~-~+--·=:,
· =-~==-----------·-->-.-....-..-.--,-~--- '--- ---~-~-~:E.-.-~ _ _;~;~
.
,- CITY DAN~ c.xr I 1,0$6.Q2 ··-·· l 4314.26
RBFUC AUTO! 313.00
----1--------l--·. I 4001.25
---crrvBANK EXP ; 390.30
--l---~---+--
r 3610.95
1MELOA CARRILLO -ENG : 60.00 1271
NBP ENG[ ·~-6-1-.1'--84--1-2-72--1----.....-....+-·-··· . 3489.77
·e~.§ CONROLLE . TAX i :~!@.~~-. 1319_...._ _ _ _ _ _ 3239.77.
! - ·----~39. ii"
[-· .. . .. ···---
RBFUC AUTOi 313.QO\ ____5,000.00 4412 7926.77
,--c-rrv-·~aANK EXP , 2s14.53 1 4952.24
1 CITY BANK·-t-'E=o..X-=-P-+---6..,.....98~.39~----+-·· ... J<1-.0,Q0;00_. . . ___44_12--'- .. 4-----t--14_25_3_.8--15
CITY BANK EXP 1 1,700.00 12553.85
TATE CONTROi i F FXP ;ono; 120; ·- .. ---..--l.-----'--1--·- '· 12503:85
RBFUC AUTO 313.00 i 12190 85
CITY BANK-·' EXP- -----·9tt[oor----------"---•- ---··-1- ~- __ ".. •
112at1'.2s
,._S ROMO TAX RC TNf . -t3.86 1206 ... -- -- 11236.39
·-·EXP --·414.'73 ---·-· 9721 11651.12
RBFUC
-- -·c·ITY BANK
Auto 313.00
CXP .......-203<):.:54 .... ·~ ····--····--·
· ··11aaa.12
850? .·se
S-ROfvi:)'tJ\x RC i TAX 590.00 1200 .... !~000~00 7312 · ·--- .... 17917.stf
,...S~ROMOTAXRC 1
TAX 1,898.35---1269~ , 16019.23
---~---Rf.il-uc .. '"AuTo~313~oq ·- ·-- ··----~ l ·--iiToe.23-
CITY BANK -- EXP 742.96 ---: .., -----· I 14963.27
,___._RBFUCf -- .. :AUTO 31.3J)O ... ·t· --···· ! 14650.27
. ·-------· 111,065.68 ---......--124,107.16 100,861.00:191.70 ----
----·:·· .. . ........ ------- .... ~--- -· --- -· __ :.. --··---·-·-··-
-----· .... -·-------+---~----+------
·-·-· ORIGINAL 1 800.49 1800'4.9
. ·------·--·-+-----+--___:.::::.=.=-==-i
I
4412 HELV:TIA -r·
. t --·--=-----+-------!--
113,692.43 '-------+--------!
~----··•· ...
7312 H GO ..o I 10,000.00
···--------:---+-~-::-=-::-=t--+--.C.........:--'--+-------+----+~,---J-------l
•
9721 JOA8ERT _4 _______. :. .:4:..:. 14..:. ::·. :. .;73;::..i. __ _I,._·_ _...l_ _ ___j._ 221>.22
SUB TOTA. ' 125,907.65 ... ·-----~128122.87
EXPENSE~ 111 ,065.68 -~- . ---- . - -2-39f88~55
254030.52
1---------·-------
r---------··-·· .. ·-·----+-
JLR·---+-------1------+------.l-.---
24;000.00
-------1---l---~--...r-:----+--··--··-·· ·--·~---1--·----------+----+---+----
*-*****' ............. ···--··--·------·
ENGtNEEF NG 1,466.32 "****,....
-----t--txAnUTTI"Q"\""EEXViP
51E~NHSiEiE~--;3~.9"'6~2~.5~0----+----1f-..:.,..=·=*d-.....--·--~--
r------t---'--'-t------"'---+-.;._:____-I--~==-==-+-- •·• ·-·- ·-- -·-~--IC------ ----C--·-··--·-
EXPENSE 26,320.04
111,257:~8 '. ...
~-1·--·-····
1---~-.. .- .
t=_-·--·~____._----1·-·.
···-----~···- ------
111,065.68!
l 191.70 . · ---: __ __ 1·' --~ ___ I
·- ]
'
Date .. Child Payee A~it Deposit Who Bank Charge !nterest
2011 1117
- - -.
CAPITOL EXP 100.00 ··-
CAPITOL 't:Jl.t' .,w.oo
TRAIL INSURANCE EXP 150:00 .. .... -
:
·- 3000.00 UNKOWN
·-
02/24 1129' llMELKDs OFF 60.00 .. -
1131 SILVIAROMo TAX 2869.31 '
L--.-
SILVIARUMO .TAX -·· 5000-~ >.I.AMO
·-·~
·-
!
SILVIA ROMO TAX 400.00 9721
l-IOWARn l .. -
CAPITOL EXP 4000.00 20571.26 .ukn ~
J..-- .. .. -di
---- 200.00: - ·--
...
YNK
-·-- - ·~--··-- ---
-- ~-
' '1133 EZDRIVE -
ENG 23.'55 ,_...,.
··- --
: ; 1134 BL LOAN BK 500.5.00
"~--- ~
... ... ---
SLYVIA ROMO TAX: 105;16 ....
,UNKNO\AIN UNK-" ~,{)()
l
-·.··
1.INKf\10\NN .. UNI< 959~19
- --···-
..:--
AuG2011 .. .AlJG2o11
- SEPT 2011 :SEPT2011 ---
j
-- - .. - ...
·- 1102 ALICIA. MINO ni;:F ., i;? no '
1232 NBP
·-
ENG 233.18
' ·-·---
1233 COSA TAX 1600.00
!
·-· ·- . ··-
-·' 1234 C08A TM 25.00
. 1237 OOSJ\ -· . TAX 1360.QO
1311.AT&T . --
EXP 122.31
5637.CITI EXP 200.00 I
---·. ·--·
- 5638
®"9
7318
- 7318
CXP
1000.00
·z.oo.oo,
; ;
.. ---
,.--
CITY :EXP.. ... 2s2s.12T
_,_ CAP EXP 1434.39 5000.00 4412
----
-- ...... .. '
1312 IMELDA OFF --00.00
=9 CllJ t:J!.t' ' l~l.3.3~UV 10.uu -...
---
-- "f14s
....___,. 1146 SPENT INCOME
-·-- .1147 -- T~X 6f71.64 HEL --· - 5400.00
1148
-- .
EXP 16472;31 ,...;.;.
UNK 23571.26
1149 'AUTO
...
1100
--- 957.50 Al.AMO 500600'
-·-···-
OFF 1597.00 TOTAL ... 33971.26
1'1!>1 UNK 5959.19 BC
·----- -1000
-
1152 ENG 2'63.21 TOTALINCC. 33961.26
1153 - ...
7318 -1000.00 SPENT 32820.85
1158 --- BK .. 500.00 DIFFERENC 1140.41
1---- 11!;;0
1100
INITUU
CAL CK
CIC E 6~
1800.49
1161 32820.85 11/0811989 Cl!:BAL 1800.49
! 1162
-· ·-. -· 32&20.85 11/081198!) CONDlTION -o.oo,
rJC),.;jEiif-Fi u..co..
--
Date Cheli Payee Amount Deposit Who Bank chariie Interest Balance
2010 1117 2045.44
CAP1 EXP 100.00 2000.00 uNif 3945.44
CAl"1 EKf" 7~:00· ,_,_
:»070.+4
-
BEXAR TAX .;TAX 1~;1)3' 3705.41
- BEXARTAX :TAX 172.12 3533.29,
--···-
BEXAR TAX lTAX 175.~5
-··· ...... -- ·-·-----·
335.7.94;
DCXAl\TM TM IOll.pf* ~1TZ.l)0 ·
~-
BEXAR TAX TAx 186.46 ·- .. ..
I 2965.89
BEXAif TAX.. -- TAX 191:66 2794.23i
l=-- BEXAR TAX
D~Tl"IX
TAX
T~
211.42
zoo.oo ..... ~--·
-2582..81
2:>Z:>.e;;i;
!
i
BEXAR TAX TAX 276,28 2047.67
BEXAR TAX TAX 346.72
- ' 1700.95
--- ;
;
r-----···-·-
BEXAR TAX TAX $97:60 -- 1103.15
, ijl::.Mt( IM. I~ t>/:>.~:.! ,,_ u1.&.l
9030. CITI CARD EXP 100]0 ··soo.oo CONTOUR 727.83.
CAPONE EXP 376.00 ·soo.oo CONTOUR 30.09 821.74
CAP.ONE EXP -·a2·1:t4
GAJ:'UM:: ·~t'C ·. 1UUU.UU 4U.1 Ht:L -·-t- 16;!1. (4
CAPONE EXP 200:00 1621.74
'----'--- --·-··· ·--
CAPONE EXP 1000.00 621.74
ClTI EXP 24.21 597.53
l,.;I fl ·---- CAI" 1~_9.~t 5/03UNK 19U3.13
--- WC ---
CITI 58.401 '"'
1844.75
CAPONE .EXP 163.a;> !
.-....~
1681.75
--~~·· ···-·--·----·--·
1118 NOTARY ASSN OFF 72.95: 1608.80
1119 HEB'NJJO I Al.:J;:) ·AUt.\. !13.W l::l;,.;l.;;IU
·-- i---··---
cm EXP 55.34 1498.16
C'AP ONE ----· EXP 500.00 998.16
1120 NA1'ioNAL·ai:.u& -·· OFF·- -·-~--ra.oo ... --·-----
980.16
1121 EMEWA~RIIa ---SO.OO; ··~-- ~·-
'Uf:F ~-92~
CITI EXP 92.93' 827.23
·-·
CA.PONE EXP 300.00, -- ~. -- ....... ·-···-· ··-·---
527.23
·- -- CAPONE EXP 300.()0j 1000.00 HEl..VET 1227.23
exp" . ...!19:~
CA.PONE EXP . ... - -----··- 921;23
CAPONE~ ... ~;oo.:
-- 627.23
lMELDACARRILLO
Al,JCIA HINOJOSA
OFF
EXP
60.001
38:53; -· ---- 567.23
528.70
EZDRIVE
NBP
OFF 39:00'.
19.35:
_...... 489.70
-------·- OFF --- . -·---··· ---- . --- .. -
470.35
CITI 'EXP 150.00 .. 320.35
CAPONE EXP 200.00 120.35
'.
l
:
CAPONE
HOWARD KAHN
BfxAR 'CCiiJNfY ... -
EXP
LEG
100.00
2100.00 1000.00 HEL
- ... ..
--- __ ..........,.
-
20.35
··--
.-1079.65
~--· JAx 116.00 ....•.1100:00 HEL
····· --~· ·- . ..
564.35,
CITI EXP 50.00 100:00 UNK 554.35
,C/lf>ONE EXP 100.00 168.&3 HEL 623.18
______ ., .C/iPONE EXP 600;00 586.90
tff~~'-···----- ···- ········ .... • 610.Q8f
__ 1-...... , ___ ....... ____ _, __
;.,,._,.._~
"" ... .. .. ·---· -·--···---~
'C/lf>ONE EXP 100.00 510.08
cm EXP 100_00 ___ 410..9.8.
1141 cm EXP 150.00 400.00 HEL ·- 660.0&
DEC31
--·-.. --~··~·····-
1142 ---·----·--· ,_ ··ua:oa
1143 660.08
11414 ! 1161£6? 10?f\1 ~"
1145 -- l
30.ClQ
---- ...
.. 1146 SPENT i!NCOME
1147 ----·-
------ ... ·-· ..... - TAX - . ,_ .. 3558.61' HEL 5855.73
f1.4R FXP- ·-·5flj3~41 UNK 3405.62
1145 OFF 269.30 CONTOUR 1000:00
1150 : AUTO 55.30 Tu1AL 10261.35
1151 ' LEGAL 21.00-.00 INCOME-· - 10261.35
L...._...-.
. ·-----·u~
I 1153
RANK CHAR
TOTAL
30.0!'.}
11646.71
.. _
"ffitALINU: 10261.35
l---· ·· 1159!
1156
--···~-
11616,62
,Jo.09 1 ERR Dli=FERENC
SPENT
·~i~~~~t~-~
1160i INITIAL CK i . '2045,44, --·-· ....
1161 (;ALCK 660.08•
1162
·.-
E~ CKBAL. 660.08
1~63 .,.. <;_<)NDITION -0.00
. ·-><-·.-!
CONTOUR ACCOUNT
...
t
r--:-
1
2
--
f---
--j cONJ~UR HPnLs
--- ~
i
...
-· --·· ...
-···
. ..
--··
.
ADJ TOTAL
-·- · · -
3 I 2010F i ~011F ~12F 201JF 2012RB 2013Rt... SAVINGS TOTALS ADJ
·~-~ - ··-
4 INCOME
6
---
i i
-- . _,.,_
-···· - ··•"
I
-- ·-
8f,113.60
~- ···- ---·--· ---
88,113.eo' 88,113.60
6 SALES
7 UNKSOURSE
-· 2,901.90
-·-···. --- .:..
e7ifoo 3,579.90 887.00 4,466.90
I
-- -~ ." -. (4'..428.44
8 BK 562.25 21,ID4.70 22,486.95. {Ei3;8Ss.39
~ 441~ HE~ .. 1f,OOO.OO 1~*.100.00 140.00 298,030.84 160,C41.20 845;312.Q.( ~-J645,312:04
10 SA\ANGS (20;COO: o.:cY ' (20,)00.00 . ··- 20,0CO.OO
---·· ·-
1 'I 7312HEL GOL.0 '(00;000.00 zsoo.oo ·-···- ''"
20,000.00 122,s~q._90 (122~5CO.OO
·-·-
12 JOA3ERT 972;. 4,000.00 ... 4,:mo.o.a (4,0CO~OQ -
-·· -..-..... ...
13 OtV ... ... " ·- --
14 NAT -· ·- ... ··- ...
15 ALA~O ...... . .. ...... ·.· '"
1S COfffOUR ' ' .51,223.3'1 s.1,2n:37 '
[17 TOTAL INCONE 562.25: -· .
10(015.50 272,100.00 6,640~.09).398;030.84 . 161Ji4$:90 71.901.3i e11.1es.ae (814,8~0.4~~ - 51.152.06
1a
19 O.UJGOING
·- ..
t
"' .:...,: .. -
"20'
.......... -··- ·- .. - ;
.
...... ,.. .. -- - " ...
21TAX -··. .. 219:CXH 525.00 16,784.78 17.528,.JS 1'.!>28.78
22 JR ..
'
.. -
22;691.SS; 16,296.90_ . 43~~1,5.63 .. ~2,303.0_1 82,303.o1
--~
--"f~.BK -- 1,300.~. 38,C58.19 24.537.20
.: :;
63~~5.39 (63-,8E5.39
.. :8E7.00
.H·,~~
2.4 UNl
'02101 -- --~-~~-- 1.u~·?n
' 03/01
_.....,__ _,_____,~ ~-+---<-14.ts.20
'04/01 --I-+-- (Hf . .... _ _ _ ·-1445.91 .
·051o·-1-+-P-R 100.00 I --+------ 50000;00 CK : - ---- . S1345.91 .
06/0-f+-'--'--- ~()~28 - 51346.19
07/01 -------· - · - - - - + - - 15.76
08/0f'' .. _____ ,. .. 51361:95
51361;95
08/0 1· CHECK 00000,oQ $7S.OO ·-T-+---=220-.10.. - - - - ·-.,,.-20-.1=7 ---- 25.00
10101 +------ -~-·- -----
'11!01 --·---- ----,----!- ----· -----~.-+-, - - - - ·.-
~'.oo
-25:00
t21o1=-+-- 7.6[
t2/0f BK ..... ~5(04
0.00
.TOTALS ---- ~'952~69+---- 46.32 46-1353.971
- - --·-:....-- -+--- -----·
--CHECKING · 48066.53 INCOME ----- .......
"
R.ililt ni PH RRon~-'-~·-,f":+.+-r11_Trn._·-•+---1---
~
-· ·
- 2012 - .. . ·- -·--+----+--- -----+----+-
- DATE NAME- . HRS RATE; TOTA SS WH OTHE AMOIJN-T-~---1.-TY-P+C°K ~9/1 D~_~QS-IT BALANCE.
:-.. --oTTlS Vi'll.Dr!MC~r:: LCt\MA. az. 00 p 10 I .:Si.oo
07/30 "CASH DL - --- -400.00 ,DL 104 ,__ - -:400_00
8 "01119 ETHAN MccAt:I-- 40.75 - - 1.2 489 2a 1 41 ~2ot 440.00 IF> 1001 sooo.oo 4560.oo
"'7 07119 DON SHOEMAKER - . 24 11.25 "z76""15 r+-2r 228.oo p -1002 50Cf00 - 4832.00
7 07/19 WELDEN SHOEMAKER 16 · 14 224 13 11 . 200.00 P 1003 1500.00 6132.00
! -,. --07/19 FREOSEEHA.lfs8r···- 32 9 288 16 1i. 36 219.00 p 1004-1400.00 7313:00
L----- r·o7719 AG -3~ 36.oo f> · 1oos 7277-:-oo,
7 07/19 h~ l=NTF=RPRISi=- . 7000 00 S --,-10{jff--·· ---- ---:i:\777on
>--7 07/19 VALDEMERE LERMA·--· ~f. 16 544 31; --32 481.tlO p"" 1007' . .. 4796.oo
7 07/20 DiXIEOIL 2898c00 D fooa 1898.00
1--7
·T
a"" 01126
VOID
CASH
ETHAN MCCAU 40· - 12j 480 27
· --~·--
41 20
· ---zfi
39
··-~. V
0 p
1oc·
1009:------
1010
1011
· -..
1898.00
•oso.oo
1315600
7 07/26,LlONSH~AKER 40 1t25·· 450 25 45' ---'- 3.95. ~p 1012 ·'edoo
7 07126 WELD_E,N SHQEMAKE,R ··20 14: 280. -16 2$4;00 P 1013 647.oO
vr1z.c l"RED SEEHAOSEN -·- ~ . 8 _¥"u' '!ts ' HI .:io· 251,00 p ·---im"4· --"396M
1-,=1 01ri6 AG - · , ~36 -- 36.oo P .· · 1015 ~-- 35o:«:Jo
,_ .7 01126 VA[BEMEREJERMl\~75. 16 14s ·12si - --~--·a-20,00 ·p -- 1016 - --· ~26o.oo
7 e-c07t26 VALDEME~E l,,1;_B.MA -~ W . 100 - TOO:OO P~ . 1017~---, -360.00
8 08J24 DON SHOEMAKER 32 H.251 360 45 315~00 P 1018 "675.00
1-----=--8 08!24 WELDEN SHOEMAKER. 20 14 .. 280 16 264.oO P 1019 --_939~00
a· 0~4 FRED-SEEHAUSEN. . 40 8! -·3.20 41 36 243.00 P 1020_____ -1182.00
-(f i:i°'2"1 AO - . .- -36 00.00 r ·1021 -1218.00
-8 ·-08/24 VALDEMERE LERMA 32· 16! "5:t2 58 454.00 ;P 1022 · -1672.00
··a 00!24VALDEMERELERMA 4 20· "so 80.00·P 1023T -1752.00
a · :\iOib · · · v HJ24 ------~~~ • -175200
8 VUllJ V 102:5 -17::>2.oO
! B o8i03 r;JEXAR COUNTY SWPPE MIT - - ----r---- 000:00 CF'- -1026 ---- -- ---=2252:00
--!81--08103 FRED'SEEHAUSEN 40·-- 6 320 ·33 36 251.00 p · 1027>----·- -250'.foo-:
8Tli8io3 vvELDEt.fSHOEMAKER ,20, 14 280 27' 253.00. P- - 1026 -2756.00
8 08/Q3 DONSHOEMAKER 32:11.25 aao· 62.: 328.()() p i 1029 -308400
•-8 08/03 VALDEMERE LERMA-·... 5 20 160 100.00 P 1030 _!l!... -- .. --.§184.00
8 -08/03 V"[DEMEREL~RMA 40 16 6.40 6() .- •~~L---~~1 --___ ~3'.i4.00
1~8 OSlA RS 100.00 e 10;:)0 -0604.00
.8 OBI06 lMEibACAMMILLO .. . .. ---60.00 M 1037 ~--- -- -6924.00
' .8 I 08/06 VOID -·--~---.-- v 1038 ~-- -6~24:00
,-··a~ 681'09 ooNsHoEMAKER- 40 n.25 450 s9 - 381:00 F> 1039 -7s05;oo•
. 8 08!U9 WELDEN SHOEMAKER 20• 14 280 16 248.00 P · -'f040 ·.7553,0Q.
8 --08/09 FRED SEEHAUSEN 4()' 8 32{} ' 18' 23 36 243.00 p - 10.iff -- 1000.00 "::ij79s.oo;
a 08/09 AG · . .:35 3'6.oo P 1042>--·-100.00 ~872 oo
.. 8 0810!'.l VAJJ:lPMt:iRt::TF"Ri'itl\- . - 40 -1R· Adn ~ - 4A ~i;i\--00 P~- -·-1043>-- SOOJlO -6!1~!100
1---c-8 -08/o9 VAL.DEMERE ~RMA -~5 ZO 100 ~ ----. __ 100.00._L --~ 1 ~!_1_782 812: 16
a 08/to,&Off"IVE- , . . .. 202.49 s -ss37.49
1045 1s2;s2.
·a 08116TNATIONAl 8L1IEPR1Nr · i- ------,- ' - - - .· - · : --~.33 ENG -1046' - -- - 400.00~-- -5276.ai
t----=-0 06110 TXPMR CttAlNO'AW -· -- -· ' - - - · - . 59-4.10 c 10-47 . '""ooo.oo . --'-4071.00
. 8. - 08/10 CASHDA'lLABib.R:ER . : . T- 500:00 DL 1048
3200.0(f -2171.00
~-8 '. 08110 TXOPMR PAFffs·-.- - - · _ 121.59 E - --1049 25000.00 -227_07.41 I
8 08110 CHASE BANK MIUXER Tl ETH 2812.00 E 1050 ··--;:-- 19895.41
~~8 08/17 CASH . ____:>Ula!U DL __ :_:105"! ___ ,.__ -:::_~~~~
8 08117 DONSHOEMAKE!R 40. 11:25 450 SQ 38'1~ P 1052 19014.41
8 OST17 WEL[}EN:SHOEMAKER c ·20 - 14 200- 16 - - ----~ooP- ··1053 -- . ··-- "1875Q.4~
R Mi11 FRmsF=t:HAusE:N .•., 40,_ -~
8 ··Dll/1f.~• --·
··m--:::ra 2a 36
-36
242:92 P
36.00 P
~-
1055-
_____
I
18507A~
18471.49
-~-~, 081·1r~EMERel.ER¥A 40 tff_~~~- 46, ~-=-- ~~.P "Hl56~-~----'-- 179_13.65
8 08117 VALOEMERELERMA 5 20 100. :. 100.00.P 1057_ --~17~~3.65
i s;-6im1 OQNSHOtMAKER- .4(!'°1125 A.sot- fig i '.IB1 OO'P 10!18 17432.65
r a1· 08J31 WELDENSHOEMAKER 201 14 280 I
[]! . 08!3.:! fREO.SEEHAUSE_t~L ___(_-~~-~ -~~ __ . __ -~
16 ' -~·~fi-~~--
_ 2__¥.00 P 1~_9 ~- _
171~~~
_ 1692~.65
__-_--
r--=-r-==~c=--
B Otl/91 l A~
--· ··----· -·· .. .,._ -- -~-~~---
t -·--r-~1 · as:oo 1? 1061 16aes::-ei;-
8 081'31 VALDEMERE LERMA ·- ·40 16! 640 58! 562.00 ;P 1062 -16300.65
~8-1-.,.06/_3~11+,-'V=ALD=··~e_M_ER_E_·:_LE_R_MA_·__-t--_ _5 -.~or, ~1.00 100.00 p 1063 16200.65
8 08l31 'VOID : p 1064 .,i--16200:65
-- - --o- -~IT~f=AL'o - . - . - .-- ---··--+-1=0-1---1""'4~,-22=-:-,.4-t--oz"""4-++--·---..-·---:ioo.o_o_ P · 1005 ·· · -- · ! 10000.00
8 08/31.JERRYRICHIE ---- .. --.. 16 ... _1~! 208 21 l ~T87.o6 ·p -
105.67 p
· 1ti66
1067
·-·---=i:. -15713.98
1§~19-~~
8 08/31 •ARMONDO LERMA 8 14 '. 112 6 · .
8 08/31. FRED SEEHAUSEN BOBRIPJ,.E i f .aon.~1eR 1oss ·----.;-~14913~8
_I;_ Iv 14!1T3.98
-.:--r-r--..--=--=w=
, • 1 .
1--+---t----------t---+---+---·- -~~~- =-=~~~~----=--+--1491j:98_
' ! JV
·----1 --·· ·--- - ·-·-;--·~t··--·-·------·--rv--- -------!"--· ~--·-·-·-·-·
I 1.4913.98
1A013.08
09/05! SAWS
··,---r--· ·-~----.....__,.···:----- ... - ... ...........
--~-- ---<---~---+---++--~---~-~~-+--~------+--~-c=--i
1060.00 W 1069 13853.98
,___,.___09_1_05__,i_V_AL_D_E_M_E_R_E_L_ER_MA_··_+--_24--+-_16~:_384 36 .. ; 346,00 P 1069 13507.98
1---i--=:~·~=~-·1-;1 ~~~~R~EM_Y_R_IC_H_IE_·---t-----+-----+-- _. _ __ ---~=-=~~=- ~~ ~;~~::
9 09/~IMCOMASONRY ! ! , 2000.00jKL 1071 11284.98
··9-00/051WELDENSHOEMAKER 20 14: 200 >-_1!!.;.:__+- 264:001P 1071 11020.98
-9 09/051 JEREMY RICHIE 24 13 j 312 39 l . • 273.0() j P 1072 10747:98
I
9 09105 FRED SEEHAU$EN 40 8 1 320 40 ; 35 j 244:0() 'P 1073 10503.98
1--o-9+--=09/05-=-=c.,,-1~-=o-=-o-N""'s.,..H""'o=e,,..,MAK...,..·
""e=R=-.--+-____,.40.,...,·'""1..,...1_2,,...,5--',-.-450·..,.,,.+,.,.- 69 361.00 P 1014 10122.ss
9 09/05 VALDEMERE LERMA 3 20 60 i --'i5:oo 15·- ---1075 -------->---:i0047.98
,__!:!-+--'OW_._1?_-~J_FR_F_U~Y_R_IC_H_IF~·----+--?_?_s......
f---,,-9+--_....,_F_,R~E=D~S=EE=-HA_·_U_SEN
,_~ --·····-· ~~&~-~1-rccrn~c-.-·-·-- ·
· ___ 13 .2Q2 5;
_ _-t---1-----· 1 -~=-~-·
' .
. .·
_ 38 . 254, 50 P
_l_·_·:~c----~-·~54.00 P . __!~,_ .._____
1 1
::~~ ~
1078
~g;g
Q71l3 48
·9539_·45-
- -----~~~:~il
f) ;l\(J I ·00' :'J0.00 p 1060 -tioo.-23
: 09/05i~~ci:~i~~~~MA : ~~J ~~- S _d ____ ! ---~-i--~-- 1~· &--- -~~:}--!~ --- --~~J!
9 09/05 :weLDEN:sf!OEMAKER- ·- 20 14 280. 16 . l 2S4JJO , , - -:ros3"'-···· ---- 1326.23
,_! _Ul:llOO ~·~· . . ·- Ltf{MA "IU lt> . Q'IV.. • . 04 i ;;J;JO.IJIJ t' ,jUU.UU llJllJ. .!:;>
9 09/05 DON SHOEMAKER 32 11.25 36tf .. - . 2sfOO:P -- ---------779~23
9 09!05 ·VVELDEN SHOEMAKER 20 14 280 264~00 p 515.23
9 01/01- DON SHOEMAKER 40 11.25.. 450 381.00 p 1087 134.23
9 09/23 FRED SEEHAUSEN 40 81 326 40 280.00 p 1089 85.ZS
io 09123.!AG 36.00 p 1088 200.00 249.23
10 09/JO :DON SHOEMAKER 40 11.25 45():; 381.00 p 1091 182.83 51.06
·;,-o--owao'!VVELDCM Sl40r;;,MAKGA 00 14; rul()'. 28-1.00 p 1000 '100:00 187.06
10 ~/~j.~~~Q§_~E~AUS~f~t_ __+-'-_40--+---~--~9. ___4Q+ _ _..____ 244.00 P 1093 900.00 643.06
10 10/07 1AG , i 36.00 P 1092 700.00 1507.06
~·· ._. "-·--7tlep---~---r----ir--~---r---rr;---__,...---;;;2;;;;;7.-;;;;7:;;;-'6t;:E::;-:N<.:;-:;:;1--:1'-0~9471------t--1"4:::;:79=-.36=-i
lti i0/0i-:-1.JO'Ns""·"""Ho=1::""M=AK==t..,.K~-+--~!llll=-1--1=1-=2t>~.~4""w~1._,·-++-~~-_,__-~;;sts~,~.w.,,,,.·+"'~-+--.;,.1u·~~,-,...+1 1titfoffj" ____fltm.&B:
10"·10107 WELDEN $HOC.MAKER 20 14 2$>1 1 264.00 P --1095. 186.10:· fl23:00
10 10/07 FRED SEEHA(iSEN- - 40 " - 'lr·-320:·-40 : : .. 36" - 244.ocf p--- -1698. 4000.00 --4879.oo
.10 10/07 ·AG ' ------y· ·:35_ 36.00 P 1096 25000.00 29843.06
!TEXAS MUTUAL 904.00 I 1100 28939.06
10 10/14 DON SHOEMAl4Ml=--~·I0 P 10s:ls:l ·---- •- - - c·~-1,.7700
10· 10/14 AG_____ ' I ' . -36 - 36~0 p 1101 28091.00
10 10t21 .-, ..- ·--- ----~----, · T v - -- -- --·2aoero0
J,g. Ci~~ " • • +-- ~ ·------- - ~~g;~:;~
10 UJ.'21 FRED SEEHAUSEN 40 8 320 1 40 38 244.00 P 1102 -- -- .. -· - - .. -27847:00
i 1( 'f1/76 VALDEMj;;Rt;LERMA-----,---·5 --30 "-l5o . V 10000.00 37841.0o
·1.t 1·112.1 :ooFf·sFioEMAKER ;2S~e1 r142s, soo · .,, ___ . -·---- v 1 -~ro-:430s.oo -42.1s2.00I
--~--. - -- BOBBY CHINESE -~ ---- - .·· . 7808.00 BR 20000.00 54344.00
. 11 : 11127 VALO~Ml;RE LERMA ·-·- -·--- - V 859.31 55003.31
~ 11/27 :SLVIA ROMOJLRIP ---- ----.....,, --,--+--+-+----+--- - -- 10000.00 JLR . 162 45003.31
~-119.l. ..f.$)St\PERMIT .. -.. ~. __ . -.. . . ;·--··. .... 25.nn CF_v_ 1024 . 44S7ttJ_1_
1·1 ·11/27 IRS' . ~~~~. 2043. .93 ·p , 1126 42934.38
_, 'f'!T"'Fti27-i:z··- 39.00 s 1127 -·- ·---- --42895.38
11 11127 IMELDA-------+--------··-------+---o------+--+ 60.00 M . ;· - 1128 42835.38~
11 11127 NBP. - - - - - + - - i---- .... - --+---....+----+-- 66,~5 !:NC ··-1129 __ __ _ "1277013
11 11127 I ---+-----+\/ 1130: 42770.13
11 11127 · ---t-- .. " ' - - 1 - t - - - - t - - - 4000.00 IP . ffa1-, -----+--~3877{>-:-1_~
-· ~---·· .. _,_ ---~----'--- -~~,i.·--~-~~·
... .
HfZT IMELDA .. : .. oo.oo M 11·20 4"SOS&.:>6
11127 NBP ! f}S.25 ENC: 1129 43034.13
'
'
\' 11127
-
- 1 v 1130 43034.13
An00.00 p 1131· - 30034.13
-~ 11/27'
i
~127 VALDEMERE LERMA 150.00.P 1132 38884.13
.. 11'27 DON SHOEMAKER ·- -·
300.00 p .. 1133 i.--
38584.13
I• 11/27 VALOEMERE LERMA 300.0D p 1134
--"·-
38284.13
I• f11Z7 v 1·5()()00.00 10029-4.13
.. ·-- -- ...
5468.00 BR OW
-- ·-·
40000.00 222816:13
!• 11127 WIRE TRACKS
-·· -nao.oo eR
11127 RRIPLET CHINESE RETl RN i 1 230596.13 ;
'"
~1 t/27 VALDEll!1Ef
41.20.W
-·· L _ - - · -
108.
1072'
230546.13
230504,93·
"' 11127 SAWS . -
110.54 ENC 1073 230394.39
"I• 11127 f\IBP
175.0(l s 1074 230219.39
11127 EZORIVE
11127 c·f>s· I 00403.~ c:LI::'.• 101"G _.,_ 183010;00
11 11127 TEXAS LANDMARK SUR 'EV 3000.00 s 1103 160816.09
~. -· -- 400.00 p fi3s. -· 160416.09,
I', 11/27 ,VAi.DEMERE LERMA .... ··-·- ---·-
I•· -723.00 'P..
h
.. .. - ---· ·-
'' ...... .
..
. -···
! I
-
..
·-
-·
!• .
·,.'---- -···
.. - -· -
137,475.69 ****'***•" 298030.84 348Z884.97--
' .. ' 139.06 TYP CKNO DEPOSIT ~Al,ANCE
' ! 137614.75
..
~- -- ·-·
139.lJ6: BAN KCHAH ~t!:i
' ··--
25759.!,le PAY ROLL
"
H
-·-··
' 5416.49 SUR ~EV
..
-- ··--·---
I•
.. A1A300 DIF~ Fl
1----<"" ---· -·····--
I•
.-
!
-
10824.02. EOl PMENi ...
I•
.. 66403.30 cPs:a~c ----
.I•
... ., . 16i:Kioo .DAYLABOR .. SAV500
--· .. ... ..
"IZ0.00 MAlllTAti'I
... ... -
;, I
6296.00. _BOB RIPLE~
----
: -- ·-·-,.- !
I<
I•
1101.20,WA ER
904.00 INSI RA_~C"'.F
.. - j
I•
-- -··
10000.00 JLR
,. -----
l•i------
cm A/FEES -
... 525.00
342.82 ENC: NEER ii m
"'
"r. -. - -- -·· ....
2000.00 KEY .LARGO
111
~--- .. .... .137,61~.75 ..
-·
'i
--· .,.._
MOFIED FOR lJ TALS ·
--
'
139.06 BANI< CHAf;GES
·-·-··
... 120,311.87 COii STRUV ~TION
-- ~ ·«-·-
... ... 16,296.00 JR .... ..
-
_ ... 342.92 ENO ·--
525.00 TAX i
+------ ... .. .. --·· ' .. -
;...-..,. -·
'
-. ·-·-·· .. 137,614.75 TOT N- ....._.._-..J
~-
-·-- - -.. '
I•
I•
ORIGINAL ............. .t QRI•
·rot ~-OEP1 )Sff...
NAI._-
298030.84
-
• Ol;;POSffS G~R i;)t.P 0:MSi;;s 137614.75 . --··:.
• ,SPENT ERR SAlJ ~~CE 1§0416.09
' BALANCE
..
---- ERR BAN !STAT MEN 160416;09 . ... ! . -1077.00 _____,
1i'
2000 qo" moN -O;OOj
-~~-
MANK t-tt:
-
.·-----··
l:::RK
...
..
·-
. .. I
.. ...
!
RANr lfltPW 1:i~Ml(~·r.ONT(.\UR
··--
!
' .. ·.
-- --· -·- ·----·-
: 2013
MON DATE NAME HRS RATE TOTAL SS .. WH OTH1:1- AMOl.INT lYP CKNO DEPOSIT ;SAL.AtlCE
. ·- OTHE~ AMQUNT TVP Cf5.NO oFPOf;IT RAIANr.F
MON.DATE NAME FfRS RATE TO{AL SS WH
i ... ., ... .. 160416]9
1 J 01£14 HOLTCAT7 972-40 E 1-077 159443.69
1i {11107 ALLSTATE; - ...
730.00 INS 1-078 1511713.69
- _,
....831.00 1{179 157882.69
250:00 g~
1 01/01 COSAPLAT
1 Ul/Ul ~U:iAPLAf
1()80 157632.69
-·· --
I
1 01/01,DYE ENT 2500.00 sui: ERR 155132.SQ
I
1 01/01 TExAs LAND"!~KSUR\'EY
•
!
-· 1.150.00 SUR ERR 153982.69
1 01/01 IRS .. 1744.12 IRS 1136 6.69 152245.26
···-
~-i
01/Uf ,f(~ t ROSIE JIMENEZ
-- ---· -· 1!)2.00 p ·2151 1015~1.03
4 04/01•ACT 3479.54 PLB 2152 .. 98071.49
' 134.30 ENG 2153. 97937.19
4 04101 LONE STARREPROGRAi ICS ... -
CM/01 VALOEMERE LERMA EXf 5.00 20.00 100.00 100.00 p 2154 97837.19·
4 0410.1 OOOEOJL 375.54 ti :n55 97461.65
4 0410l VAlDCMt:Kt: LI:t1 VALDEMERE LERMA 32.00 1·1,00 544.00 --· 55 489,QQ,P 2157 96892.65
50.
- ·~~. -
466:00:P 2158 96426:65
4 -04A>1 ARMONOD LERMA 32:0Q 15.00 516.0Q: ..
·4·, 04/01 ARMONOOLERMA exp -4.0() il4.00 56,(p 56.00 p 2159 96370,65
.. O1 FRED SEEHAUSEN
4 40.00 14.00' ;560.00 ao ,· 36J)ff 434.oo P -·
2171'
- --- &3624.41'
433.00 p 2172 93191.41:
4 04/01 ARMONOQ LEA.MA
-- ~.00 15.00 486.00 53
-- ~-
221.00 p .2'173 - 92970.41
4 04/01 SCCllV LODez 16.oo 15.00 240.00 19 ..
r----4 04/61 MICHAEL SISK 32.00 1:too 41fU'IO 4200. 374M P ?17A A?~i:IR41
·-~
4 CM/01 VL 40.00 11;0Q 680.-00.1105:00 575.00 p 2175 92021.41
.... - - - - --gf's65:4f
'----4 ~64/o1 A,RMONDO LERM,6; ~xo 4.00 14.00 56.00 5S:Oo'EXP 2176
4: 04/01 Josuha Shoeve m-6 16.00 :15:00 240.00 18 222,00 p 2177 91743.41
4' 04A>1 CORTEZ LIQUID 95.00 FM 2179 - .. _ _ _Jl1648:41
4 04/01 lnaram 135])0 71.00 2485.00 COl'I 2180 . 89163.41
--·
4 04/01 A!3 ~36.00' 36.00 p 2181• 89127.41
4 04/01 gnrtire 1.00 150~00 E 2182
--- -·88977.41;
1,00 ' 550.00 E i
' 2183
-
118427.4.1
4 04/01 ~ dehrntt!!!.
1.1411.11 l;;t':S I t:MI' 15~);{)() EL LlB4
~----
- --88277.41
-· ·- ... -·
. 88220.41'
04/01 .IRS 57.00.IRS 2185
4 04A>1 DOOEOtL
... - -
- 1230.89 b 2186 86989.52
..4
. 4 .04/01 VALDEMERE LERMA EX! 4.00'26.00 oo.oo
,02.00. 10.oa :nz.oQ.
.. - 80.00 EXP .. 2187 -
-~--
86909.52
---- ..-
O'-llQ'I MMONDO LERIW\
04/01 'ARMONDO LERMA exp 4.00 14.00 ! 56,QO
:>!'
- ..~.00 I"
56.00 EXP
ZIM ...
.2189i
C04::i.l.::tZ
86395.52
·····
4 3S0,52
4 04/01 MICHAEL SISKm1 16.00 14.00 224.00 18 ..... 206.00_P 2193 ···-
85144.52
4 04/01 Scottvlopez 24.00 15.00 360,00 .33 -. 327.00°.P 2°1'94 - · 84817.52
4 04/01 Josul:la ShOeve m-6 32.00 15.1)() 480.00 18 ... 462.00 p 2195 84372.32
4·6'J01 m&MeouiD Rtn fVl I= --·!>~1 AG.
..
·36.()() 36.oo·P 2143. ---· 80356.46
... ..
.J0.00 p - 2162 ~-
~
·:> UOIU1 AG -- .. -36.uu ·- 80320.46
5 05/01 TX LANDMARK SU~
.
4750.00 SUR ·-2196 - r--· 755-70:46
i ... .. 75334:'46
5 05/01 ARMON'oo LERMA 16.00 16:00 256.00 20 236.00 p .2198
5 05J0f:ARMONOO LERMA exp i .2.00 14.00 28.00 28:00 p 21.99 - 75306.46
s ()O/Q1 V"LOl::MCRC .LERMI"> -10.c>o 17'.'00 ;ooo:oo .•.Q;J ::iro.oa F' ~~00 . 'f4T.3·i:40:
5 05101 FREO SEEHAUSEN m2 40.00 14.00 '560.00 90 .. .. 36.oo 434.00 p - 2201 74297.46
"---5 -05/01 AG ;.-36.00 36.00 p ; 2202· 74261.45
5 0511)1 ~Lopez 24.00. 15.00 .360.00 .. 33 32-7.00 p 2203 73934.46
ll&IO~ f;AIC~L !:H~I£ .., 1 '1.oi.00 " ..-00 -4.74U>O ..t2i .. OO 220-t '7361.3-~
eo.oo p"'
~ !iii
··y
5 05101 VAl.OEMEfU; Ll;RMA EXI 3;00 20.0Q §itoo. 2206 ·73453;46
5 05A)1 Scoflv Looei . . ... 1$.00 .15.00 24.o.001 16: 222.00 p 2207 73231.46
-- .. .. -
~~t-
5 05/01 ,,... .. 1S3.0P E 2208 73078'46
-'--'20
J~O!\A>1
~ . LER~.ce.;
~
_ _]:1113041'1
5, 05Al1
5 0511)1 AUSTl.N DIST
1A.75 :f6.00
2.QO 14.00 9 - -·-- .-
24R.00
28.00
62.17
P·
p
E
2209
2210
2213
..
72802.46
72740.29
5: 05/01 FRED SEEHAUSEN m2 40.00 14.fM! 560,00
--
go
-- -·· 36.oo .. 434:00 p 2215 72308.29
5 05l01 otXIEOiC. .. .. .. 784.01 0 2216 71522.28
: ::J IJt>IUT t=zC11-ttVt 424.00 tNG - 2218 fhnto,;!6
- -
Li! _QS/Ol Josuha Sh~ m..a 16.00 15:00 .240DO f8 222._I>_!) p 2219 70876.28
...
'-5
0../01 VALOl;.Ul;IU:; Ll;PUA&;.V:I< .A,00 ~0;()0 ao.oo '··
80.QO p
car
·----.--.---- . -
::1%22 '70'106.!UI
70086.28
05/01 ilnaram ReariYMiX' 110:00 2224
. -=
3782.58 JLR 2225 663o3.70
5 05/01 CHASE CARD SEVICt:.5
5 0~01' VALDEM_ERE LERMA. 43"]0 >--·- >-----·
731.00 mo 121. -- -· 610.00 p 2232. 65693:70
,~-
>- '5 _SI01 TXPMRFENGE
---- '
2857.8<> FE 2240 -
5ss1s.11
5 05113 V,,,_, GmJNOY I 273;96 ~ 2241 55344.81
-· 1814.00 E 22"4: 53530.81
5 05tl3 DISEL PUMP SREVICE ... 5307tf.81'
U;» 1:i IAKl\"IONUU Lt:KJlllA ;;s~;oo \llU~ ;ou:.uu l)U -.::iz,\1\1 f' .zottl
-5 b
05/13 VALDEMERE LERMA 40:00 17.00 680.00 105 . 575.00 p 2246 52503.81
5 05/13 FR,EO SEEHAUSEN m2 ~.00 14:00 56().00 90 36.00 43tttl!>4.!>1
5 05113 IlSWltY. lOlleZ
.
3.DO 15.00 12().00 18 ... ·- .
102.00 p 2250 50752:51
5 05113 MICHAEL SISK m1 32.DD 14.00 448.DO "8 400.00 p' - 2251 50352.51
5 ll5/13 :.VAl.[)tMERE LERMA EXf 4.00 :zo.oc. 60.00 80.00 p 2252 50272.51
~71).00 ,, ~7G$.G1
Ii 'Ollli3 .IC>Ouho Shl'<>Ve> m 6 32.00 >JS.OO £1?-00 30
- ... 22&3.
5 05/1.3 CORTEZ ..
95.00 p 2254 49704.51
·--· 480.00 p 2255 4922-4.51:
5 05/13 M&M ~.-- <---
5 05/13 GUARDIAN INSFORFRE l ..
! 7586 27 JLR . 2256 41638.24'
llSfi') Al.I i:lTATI= !i10.'-o ~§-~P5..!' ~1118.7.ol
5 " 051.13 ARMONDO LERMA exp 4.00 14:00 oo;oo;· ' •·
56.00 ~ 2258
L _ _ _ _ . _ _::_ .
41002.74
05/13 DIXIEOIL :· 700]10" p -- 2259 40362.74
.. 5 '---· '
'l!66.67 P_:_~- -2260
.:.
5· 05/13 FRED SEEHAUSEN m2 24.00 14,00 336;()1) 32 36.00 40094.07
5 o5i13 1VAlO.EMERE LERMA EXI 5.00 20.00 100;0'() 10Q.OO p '-
2261 -.-.01
5 05113. CHASE CARD SERVICEs; -.
3782;58 JlR ... 2262 .. ~
36211.49
5. 05113 CHASE CARO SERVICES 3598.64 E 2262 32612.85
5 05/13 ARMOt.iDO LERMA :4().00 16,00 640.00 ·l13' -.
567.00 p 2263 32055.85
-----
5 05/13 ,ARMONDO lERMAe>q> 5.Q() 14.00 70.00 70:00 p -·~ 31985.85
::J U!>ll.) VALUt:MtKt: L.~l'UlllA 1'W.U\I 111.uu ll>tl\l.W 100 n1;.i.ou IP ~ .. ·50000:00 .-------i!'f4l00 TAX "1oo?
..
7RAA1 A'.'!
6 06/01 AijMONOOLERMA ' llLOO 16.()()i 128.00 2(l 108.00 p 2274' 26n3.63
6 06/()f ARMONDOLERMA 2.00 1:4.00
-·
28.00 EXP. 2275 26725.03
6 06/()1 VL 43:00 19.00 !16.00 .. 130 ' 6fl6.00 p ' 2276 . - - ,____ -26039.63
6 llRlmt WI• I IAM i_l:\11111:1 IHtOO t•.l'li1 .224.llll .,.,. HIS!" p 2277 - - - - · ~~
--
6 Q6103 DIXIE..OIL 652.52:0 2279 25199.11
6 06!03 AG
- ' - - · - 1-------: ·-36.'oo 36.00 p 2280
.. 25163.11
6'. 06103 .EZORIVE 276.46 EN( 2281 24886.65
,
1--· "
6 06/03 /.C.T
6 UIJ/03 .KUUY U:RMA .. - - - !li.IJO 113.••
--- ,____
. g7_ ~LB
. -r---{~:~ 2282
'2283
24640.55
24443.55
~06/03 VL--- .
... ~-
' -
100.00 EXP 2284
· - .__ .. _
24343.55
6 06/03 DIXIEOfl $67.00 0 2285 23756.55\
6 06/03 INGAAM READY lilX 1511.05 JLR .. 2286: ----~245:!0
0 00/00 .GRCG RCVE.IM o.oo 13.00 TO.QO 0
.. -·T.Z.OQ ,.. uoit ~~11~.~u
6 06/03 CHARLOT CONC 433.84 PLB 21739..86
6 00/03 VL. 14JlO 19.00 272.00 21.
..2288
2289 21488.66
>-·5 06/03 FRED SEEHAU$EN m2 40.00 14.00 sso.oo ~~: 36.00 434.00 p 2290 21054.66
>--s,-.06~ NAPA
·-- !.---·· ... .. 676.0? E ·- 2.201 -··. - 20-4'70:so
6; 06/03 AG 72,00' p 2292 20407.59
6 06/03 VL
- ··- 2.00 20-l?O 40.00 EXP 2294 20367.59
'.""" 6 OEV03 Ingram Ready-MIX .. _ 071i.05 JLR 2295 19388.64
6 OBm~ I VAN GRUNDY
-
.. 65.Mlt= 7".HJR
-- .. -- I-- 19323.64
·!
6 06/03'DYE 1550.00 SUR 2298 1ffl3.64
6 06/03 lrniram ReadY Mii
-- ' ·---- 2403.15 cor. 2299 .. 1537'0.49
6 06103 FRED SEEHAUSEN rn2 .. 40.00 14.00 soo:oo !!9.: 36.00 434.00 p 2300 .. 14936.49
6 ~oi;/()3 ALAN HYDJWJJJCS .. 211.11 E 2301 14725.32
0 UON.:1 texas rnmual insurance cri noany ; 3110.00 INS l30Z l16l::J,3io!
G 00A)3 WILLIAM LEWIS 16.00 1-4.00 224.00 36 I 188.00 p 2~02 __ ,. 11427,~
··ss7.7-+ 10009~.001
-~~~
2300. 1
6 Q61.E>3 !'CT I 221.50 2305• 10648.08'
6 D6I03- ALPHA TESTING -
ti 06/03 FRED SEEHAUSE~. rn2 40;00 14.00 000.00' 00 i 36,00 434.00 p 2306 10214.08
6 06/!)3 DIXIEQIL __
- 276.62 D -2307 -
0037:46
R llMl3 A~
,.
- -~nn
-··· !VI 00 p
-- ?'los.: -- 0001.49
6, 06..V3 ASSOCIATEOESuPPLY . -
1039.95 E 2311 .. 8861.51
6, 06/03 CERTAPRO 5786.42 BK 2312 ;
3075.09
6
6
.....
,.,,. CONENTAL
06/03 HYORAULIC S.
BaES
6 00/03 FREOSEEHAUSEN m2 40.00 14.00 560:00
--
M ~RVIC~
--
90
'"••
36:00
·- ..
545.79
.. 647.87
48.73
p
E.
E
-·
2313 .•
2314
2315
...
I
- 2528.30
1RR0.4.1
1831.71>
1831.70
~ - .
I ] . "i]TJ03 'CHASE 1039.51 E 1078 792.19
' ,--.. -··-
7 07/03 US AJWAYSBOB i
_.,,
"'-+ 1143,52
440,00 p
JLR 1079 ~56.33
-796.33
7 07/03 Josuha.Sht&ve. m;.ij -
30.00 16:00 480:00 40 1080
7 07/03 Vl 60.00 EXP 1081 ·856.33
··--
7 07/03 \It. ~:'?'Q HU>Q 57(1,00 : 464.00 p 1082' -
-1320.33
-
7 07/08 GBMBINSURANCE -. ' 6879.W INS' 1084 -8200.32·
----, . Utiuts ,JQsuna.srneve ~ ,£lll.U\J It'-~.: lUISO
-··
•o",e;";::l2j
7 07/11 vt 36;00 19.00 684.00 95.00 585.00 p 1086 -·. -8814.32
7 .07/11 Vl -
111.00 ExP 1087 -8925.32
7
T,
emu Josuha Shte.ve m-6
07111 o1:.u11y Ln"""
32JJO 16.00 512.00.
o>o.oo ·'t.o.oo .ioo.oo ao.01>"
66' - -.·-. ·-
452.00'P
"i:l0.00 ,.. 1089
10$0 :
.'9377.:32
·S®T.::ll
..
7 07F11 RUDYLEHMA 32.DO · 13.00 416.00 11 405.00 p 1092 --- . : -10212.32
7 07/1 t ,FRED SEEHAUSEN m_2 40.00 14.00 56Q;OO 90 36:00 434;0() p 1093 ·10046-32
-- ·-·
1---, 7 07/11 DfXIEOIL
()7/H R.!W.L COMl<.Z - . ..
..
-.
-··
i
2000.00 b
'160.. 00 p
1095
.. 1006 -·
-12646,32
13006.3!!
1 D.7111 FLOOR DIRECT .. ' 1000.00 BK•.. 1104 ·14096.32
-
7 07/13 ASCO 839.39 E 2238 -14935.71,
7 07113 ADEL.ANTE CONTRACTC RS
- : ' 10596.00 PLB1 2301 ! -25831.71 l
7 07/13 Vl 6:rno FXP: ?316 -7!'i.lll'l4 71
7 07113 WILLIAM LEWIS .. 16.00 'ifoo 224,00 ~
.,,.
- 100:00 p 231.7
-
-26082;71
··- -
7 07/13 HPLTCAT 657.69 p 2318 -26740.40
7 07113 AG i 36.00 p - 2319 -26776-40
7; 07/13 Vl -
- - -- -··20.00
~- 2320 ·Zb796.40
7 07/13 GREG REVEIRA 35.00 ! 13.:()0 4?5.0Q 76:()0 379.QO p 2321 ·27175.40
7 07/13 .FRED SEEHAUSEN m2· .40.00 14.00 550,00 90 36.oo 434.00 p 23'12 --- . ---=2f6o9.40
7 07113 t=.MELDA CARRILLq_. -·. 00.00 p 2323
--~
f----27669.40
-··; ""\hn..>
. 07113 ARMONOOLl!RMA
l.t'~
32,00 15.00 480-~ 74 -406.00 p
!:1,;;s!> t'
.. -
.. 2323
;.!;jl!4 ·-
·28075.40
·.t:OUO'f.J:l
·-
~ 07113 GREG REVEIRA
·- ·•
,___., .. 18.l)O
.. 20· -·.·
214.00 p 2325 -28298.75•
-·@13 ACT PIPE '"
137.29 PLB
. ·- 2338 -28436.04
7 07113 GENUINE PART$
--·- s.38,P 2339 -28444.42
7 07/13 HOL.TOAT o~.C):i·p 2340 -2,91.:)().47
-·
7, 07'13 CONTINENTALBATTERI S 134.4() p 2341 ' -29270.87
7 07113 SAWS ;
... - 880.50 w .. 2342 -ao1sf31
-- ---
; 7 07113 iAi:il>O
? 0711, Vi!INCRUNOY ------
..
1()8,25 E
1G3.00 i:
.. 2343 .. -30259.62
. I t!3+t
- Q0;422JS2
7 {)7/l3 AUSTIN DIST .. 144.55 p 2345 ·30567.17
- 7 07116 JESUS DE!:fOYOS
!
1395.00 E 2346, -31'962.ff
..
... 7 07116 AG 36:00 p 234yr--··· ·31998.17 •
7 07116 RUDYL.ERMA
..
11 '
... ' - ' --
7 07/:16 FRED sEEHAUSJ;:N ~2
8.00 194-90 t 93.00 p
-·~.OOP
-· ?~A
·- 1?.
::.l?ll<11
40.00 14,00 560.00 ~ 36._o() 2349 '
'32525.17
--r ~07116 VALDEMAR LERMA EXP 5:00 10Q:OO 100.00 •p 2350 -32625:-ff
1 07116 WILLIAM LEWIS 16.00 14.()0 !ll4,00- 36, 188.00 p 2351 -32813.17
... ·-·-
7 07/16 $cotly Lopez 11>.oo 240.00' 32 208.00 p 2352 .- . -3302lJI.
7 07/16 Vl 646.00 p ... 2353 -33667.17
·-· -·
7' 07116 Josuna srueve m-6 ~-00'16.00 ~,00 50
- 510,00 p
-
2354 -34177.17
7'. 07/16 AG .. 72.00 p 2356 -34249.17
1 07116 TEXAS PMR SKID STEE -· 3200.00 E 2357
.. -37449.17
, I U/110 trulJUl::I I t:~1iA!JSENin2 8.00 180.00 15 2381 13868.17
7 011~.... [40.W 114.w tllHJ;Ull 00 36;UU ...,...uu,P 23221 --U43W
7 07123 WIRE FOR COM TO RICt IE 4526.25'E 23222 .... 8907.92
: 1 n11'~ 'f!A~ i:nA riA'~v~.J~A=RO=A=----r-· · ·~-~~~.--------~~~00:00° P !22l:!l:!3 O?o?.01:1
·, B 08119 ~SEARS ---+--+--+--l-----'--l--+----l!~~906-=-:.56~:BK=--+------'-c:..;..::.:38~,;;,7_t~~~~~:~~~~:7,.::...8;;;;0~1-=.~36~
·-"'---------1---1----t-·····-..J----l----l---;..._.......::::::;:.:;~c...:_1---·- 7351 36
8 08/08.RAYGoMEZ ! ' 450.00 E_ _L_ _1_02_5__,_____-+--~""'··,..,,·='
8 08/08 JQE:Ui.RRICA , ; 30.00 P 2360 7321.36
s 08/()8 l.AM;o.:;r;.:·Fi::,,:U~c·:.:::K:;.,,B~i:t~O~K=e=R-1--...;.....,f----',--+-~--_r-_.-.-+---+---·.f..:-=QO!\;;.;.;;.,·m=.,+1==--+--...;;;2"'-aJl9'-:.-x+----+----8llif.;,.2,;..1."'98""
8 08108 JESUS QEHOY::_.:_::S::...:--+--+-~--:-l--1.--+____,. -.t------"----'--+---+-! -- ·~45"-o_:oo_··.,...E_4_ _2_~~ j -·~---l---'59;..;;..;....71=.36:.;::_
:a 08108 N:J
8
8
08I08 LOPEZ
08l08 NEW LEAF HOMES
. I
100.00 p
600.00 cot.
2386
! 36.00 P
~= ~M~~ . . . ·+---1-----1'-··=~====~==~===--+-·--.:::l-·-_,-?z.;~ m~o~ -. : .0 ~.~~~~~;;_;:::=:=2~2"";8~86;5.;...\--'· ::::._--+---c:~~~='-':i:~·
scorrv 2835.36
2.~38=.,,l6,........._ _--J_ _ _ _
22'"'.3"""5.=36-=-1
2384 i .. _ 5935.36
8 08/08 OYE ENTERPRISES 1912.50 SUR --2388' 322.86
s o&Jos E2 bRIVE ··· ~--1---+-----+---<---,----+~ -=-309~.eo~s""u"'='R+----'2::::3:7as=+------t--"""""13"",2~0•
tl U1111Jt1 l)IJl..11:'. UIL i 4WIJ.00. 0 2390 -3986,80
8 08/08. CORTEZWASTE 190:00 FM 2391 4176.80
l--.::..\-~~~~=-~:::.:.:::..:__-4--+~-+--t--+--+---+----if--....:..:;~;;+..2f-----c~:i.-l-- ---l-------'--~ ..
1--..::.8-i-,,08~I08~~C~PS-----"··--+---+--+ __.j.___-l--+--~··-·-+----+--18_.4=24-=-FM.,.....-i- __2_3_92_,__ _ _..__ -4195.22
s OtWS 1NGRAM
-·-o '0011b ALDCf\TMC~OOOQ C· --l----l-----4---.- ... --
344.00 co~
11:lb.UU.f'
239.3
Lc'IH4
___ . -4539. 22
•;oJUU't,.£.£
8 08115 FREOSEEHAU$EN m2 4D.OO 14.0Q 580.00 90 ... =36~:0~0+---1-....:.;.434::;::.:.;.00::;.+;·P~1-----;239~5;+·---- ... --+---"-e'"'=o9="s:.:.::.2:.:;.,2
8 08/15 PG , -36:0Q. ··---1---=3:.::s...:..O.::.too.oo 2::0.aa r 20!» :oao4.ff
8 08/15 VALDEMEijE LERMArn-14().00 19.00 760.00 85· 675'00 P 2399 -765922
f--8.,._. .~os~11~5+t.o,....._~UIS~LE=RMA=""o---~·---+4""'0~.00==..+11=s=.oo'::-+-:640:=-,oo=+-=a-=-or----+-.. --i---+---'4:.:.70.:;;;:o·o~"=p~1--___;;2;c_:4,.::...oo=-+-- ·
1-, .s12s.2~
8; 08115 VAL.DEMERE LERMAm~Ho.00;13.00 520.00 50 ...-+-~-+--,-1-0.~00-i.....Ex-p-1----24...;,0::;_11--- ~823,9.22
e: 08115 SCOTTY LOPEZ ?1 nn.1.tnn ?.!WOO # 61l0.00 p $4(]!:1 - - - - - 1 - -..a_.a10.:i:i
8: 08115 GUZMAN PAVING ' 2000.00 PAV 2403. -111819.~2
8~ 08115 GUZMAN PAVING 5235.00 PAV 2404 -16054.22
f---8+-·0S122 FRED SE;_t;HAUSEN m2 40.00 14Jl0 560.00 90.... 36.00 4.34.00 P ·2405 -16438.22
8 08122 "''"""" 1 o"""" -36.00 ···-'---511-'-o-o"-o1-P- ·-----,=.:.._c::.rrT"-l--- -+--~.1=7flRA=-=,?
: 8 08/22. VALQEMAR LERMAEX--P-+,s-2-.o-0+1~6-.50-+-5-2B-:OD .........._~5(}..,...._ __ . 1-="'-"'"-1----l-:-""'11'"'0'-'-.oo=+p-+--=2408 - - - - + - - :17178.22
8 08/22 VALDEMAR .LERMA 5.00 20.00·100,00 675.00 IP 2409. · -17853:22
8 os/22 lowLERMA ·· ·· ·· 40.00 1900 100.00 85 _ _.__---+--=2:.:;a·2='-.oo=.:::.i..;...P---+---=2:.=41'f.i.-._--~---1-a1-':i-.s.~22.,.-j
a QBJ22 Jos.uha $M!Ve. m.e 40.00 16.. .; .00c;:.i. ;S40,.=. .: . :.oo'=-''". '".-...;;00.;...1-----J,--.. . . --~L...-CtfL..·oo., PE.24i2 -18613,22 ~
6 Olllii!ZSt't:eiALIYIKAILt:K~ 24.UIJll:li.uulJ12.00 JO ""·vu 2413 ·18732.22'
8 08122 ACf 14.00 - ---+-_-_-_-
-1902-""f.95 295.73 PLS- 2414
08/29 ALPHATESTING .20476.08 1448.1:J TES 2415
- - - - - + - - - ---+----+--.......,---+---1------'---~1----L---'----·-+------l
08.129 ASCO 387.90 E 2416 -20043.98
00/l& CONTJNEHT"h. a.ATTl:.RI 0 ~ ,.. ---J--+------· ii!4u,oo t :t41] . JiiOOU.uu 01no.U---+----=ce5=='7:--::,16 W 2459 17511.45!
1----+-1""110..;.1~AM--=E..;_R1'--CA~N~.s,..,1GN~AL====-::===-:===:---1,... 2400~00 slGr ·· ·=2~460~-----~1=11::...,1-,-1.~45='1
·~-+---+---.-~--564~..-=-3.-=51,.-t;T~AX=.t-- ·-2·=4=5;
11101 IRS
11/01 IRS
----
8~.19 TAXi
11.a7.94 i
2663.75'
2462
1
11/01 CAPITOL ONE l 1441.40 EXP
1----1-~1',,-110~.1"-+=B~K--~------+---+--+--1-----+- ----- t-· -· ·-·---.--~~12=2~3~,3=1+,B;;,.K:;,_+,
2463 ~22u1 \
1 -~24..,.;64~---+--- --- o.ool
11101 i 2465 0.00 i
I 11111 tJ t . i4titi IJ'.W
l---+~1-==1101~f---------·-+~-_-~_,,__ _,___ _,__---I-----. ·-------·"···--_,___ ____,'"=p-1----2=~=5=7+-----+---· -o.oo
11/01 322318:37 ·=E=R=R+1~4~01~2=5~.76-=-1---.......,,;;,,~
C:f'ltR
f---t----+--------1'---+--+---+--- :._·a"'"~~l=§·,1;,~""'.AL,----\---__.,.1604=-c""'t6,..,,;09=+---l··--· ..-- ...
BK 21904.70
·--t---l----1f--_,....-f---¥.H:;IO:;,.L-+-----l-----c;6oo:f1 :20·=-=-i--1----___,1-----+
SAV -20000.00
-------+---!-~--- . -···-· -+----1-Tc..:;Oc..:.T'-'1--.Al-=--N,.:,,GO=~E=--_.;,.;160~1945.90
1---+----J1----------+---+---1---l----l-'...T0.:::.11'.:.;'·A..:;:..cCA::;,,
...:.::S:;,H.:.... 322361.99 -
,___,___ -+----------t----l--+---1-----l~SGPE!;;!N~•T~.- I 322318.37
·-+----11---+;:BALAN~·~· 1•
±l~GE·~~--l--~ ·--44~.64=·+--------
CHEQK BOOK ······- .3223!1!~3? ·-· t-·-·-· . ----i
1---r---t---------t--+---+-,.--+----+=BA=-~=·LAH
:..:i-:-:C=-=E=--.+i__ ..,.__;~---l-~---·i-·· ·-+-----'
I
' : i
1--+--.J.--======n~~g:t==~ SPEftl- ; c it JLR
----+:.=.::--
t-~-+--l--------+--+--+--+--J::P~'A~Y~Rg;;DL~L~k--1--.:,.;;71221.46 C ; 7122f46....,.--
·-+---i~CO~t::.=iw...:.:TRUC=:.:T:.i,:O::.:N.:.__1_...:1~5Wf:36 C · 15171.36
1---t----+------·-=-~~1=_~~~"=-~~:~-=- TAX
tl.IUI' Mt.NI
18595.89 C
;ucnt>.l)O/\., .;JJO :.>.oo
OFF3031.89 C
--+---+----+- ·-+~B;::K~=---+----1._-.._··~9oo~.0~0::. C -+,,__,,.--+-----1--
WA:TI R 2597;6f)"C 2597'66 --~
JLR 43315'.63 JLR =-i----+--_4_33_15.:63
I~ FEES 1001.00'C ., 10if1:00
,,.____,,_ _ ___,_.c.,;;..o,,c:·N,;'C . 1042.15iC 7()42.15
J=ti;;:L'r Mii.it.i - MQ.00. C 4A0:00.+-----11----·-
l---+---t------..,..-----l---+---l-----'---l.f:....':E~N~CE ."-'.. ....---+---2~115~7-.80--C-·_.__.265i60
!~~ . =~:~~,~~ 1_4.=c56=-7..c:.7...:.0+-___ ,, __ _
-·--------+-...,.,t--+--+--..:.,'·1~rc - - - - -
OONI TRVOT ON f&2860.TO ·
1----+--___,1-----~-......._--t---+--+---+-~~'Nc=S.::..:U=-·+--tAN-'Gc=:E-J.c... -~---'-=1"9~32"'_4..,9_..i_-1------l----+--
l---t----11---------+---J.--' '"-· . ' JR
tAX . · -· - ___' ,__.,,..,35380==·
43315.63 -------
=·,57==..-.--+------1----+--..- - - -
1---~·-- 1-----··-----·-·---- ... -·--<-----11--EN_.Gc:;.:-+------r------·1- 3816.75
OFF
.TOTAL .322363.01 '. 182880.75! 35380-67 43315.63
, l . . -.l. 322~:1()1 . l . . ...l. - --·-··-~