Ruth Jackson v. State ( 2005 )

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-382-CV

RUTH JACKSON APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS AND APPELLEES

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

----------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION ^{(footnote: 1)} AND JUDGMENT

----------

On January 20, 2005, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a).   Tex. R. App. P . 38.6(a).  We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  We have not received any response.

Because appellant’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.   See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL D: CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 24, 2005

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.