Fredrick Merril Jessop v. State ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •       TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-12-00091-CR
    Fredrick Merril Jessop, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SCHLEICHER COUNTY, 51ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. 1016, THE HONORABLE BARBARA L. WALTHER, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant Fredrick Merril Jessop was convicted by a jury of the offense of
    conducting a ceremony prohibited by law. See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 2.202(d) (West Supp. 2012).
    Punishment was assessed at confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas
    Department of Criminal Justice. See id.; Tex. Penal Code Ann. §12.34 (West 2011). Jessop filed
    a notice of appeal from this judgment on February 9, 2012.
    The clerk’s record and reporter’s record were due for filing in this Court by
    March 7, 2012. Neither was filed. On May 14, 2012, the district clerk’s office advised the Clerk
    of this Court by letter that appellant had not made arrangements for payment of the record with the
    clerk’s office. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a). By letter dated June 26, 2012, this Court notified Jessop
    that he had neither paid, nor made arrangements to pay, for the clerk’s record and that his failure to
    do so meant the clerk’s record would not be timely filed. We informed Jessop that his appeal may
    be dismissed for want of prosecution if he did not make arrangements for payment of the record and
    submit a status report regarding this appeal on or before July 6, 2012. On July 5, 2012, we received
    a letter by fax from Jessop’s counsel indicating that he had informed his client of his obligation to
    obtain funds for the record and that he had been advised that his client was “diligently arranging the
    funds.” Counsel requested until September 30, 2012 to respond to this Court’s notice and make
    arrangements for the record.
    On October 23, 2012, this Court sent a second letter notifying Jessop that the record
    on appeal was overdue. We informed Jessop that his appeal may be dismissed for want of
    prosecution if he did not make arrangements for payment of the record and submit a status report
    regarding this appeal on or before November 2, 2012. To date, no status report has been filed, the
    record has not been filed, and no arrangements for payment of the record have been made.
    We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
    __________________________________________
    J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Goodwin
    Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
    Filed: December 21, 2012
    Do Not Publish
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 03-12-00091-CR

Filed Date: 12/21/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/17/2015