McKay v. Fulgham , 220 S.W. 171 ( 1920 )

This is a companion case with 1615, McKay v. Tally, 220 S.W. 167, this day handed down. The allegations for cancellation of the oil lease are substantially the same as in that case. The terms of the lease are the same here as there, and the facts established on the trial are identical, except that $96 was paid before the time limit expired to the Worsham Banking Company.

This case will be ruled by the Tally Case, and upon the authority of that case we reverse and render this one.