Lowell Quincy Green v. State ( 2017 )


Menu:
  •                         IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-17-00304-CR
    LOWELL QUINCY GREEN,
    Appellant
    v.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS,
    Appellee
    From the 54th District Court
    McLennan County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2012-790-C2
    and
    IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-17-00327-CR
    EX PARTE LOWELL QUINCY GREEN,
    Appellant
    From the 54th District Court
    McLennan County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2012-709-C2
    and
    IN THE
    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 10-17-00328-CR
    EX PARTE LOWELL QUINCY GREEN,
    Appellant
    From the 54th District Court
    McLennan County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2012-791-C2
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    In appellate cause numbers 10-17-00304-CR, 10-17-00327-CR, and 10-17-00328-CR,
    Lowell Quincy Green filed two “writ of error” proceedings and another proceeding
    seeking to quash the indictments and reverse his convictions in trial court cause numbers
    2012-709-C2, 2012-790-C2, and 2012-791-C2. The Court of Criminal Appeals and this
    Green v. State & Ex parte Green                                                    Page 2
    Court have recognized that “the exclusive post-conviction remedy in final felony
    convictions in Texas courts is through a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to [article] 11.07.”
    Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 525 n.8 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); see TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.
    ANN. art. 11.07 (West 2015); Ex parte Mendenhall, 
    209 S.W.3d 260
    , 261 (Tex. App.—Waco
    2006, no pet.); see also Ex parte Beard, No. 10-15-00252-CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8522, at
    *2 (Tex. App.—Waco Aug. 13, 2015, orig. proceeding). Moreover, only the Court of
    Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over post-conviction writs of habeas corpus in felony
    cases. See Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 
    910 S.W.2d 481
    , 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 
    802 S.W.2d 241
    , 243 (Tex.
    Crim. App. 1991); see also Ex parte Beard, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8522, at **1-2.
    Because we have no jurisdiction over post-conviction habeas-corpus proceedings
    in felony cases, we dismiss Green’s proceedings in appellate cause numbers 10-17-00304-
    CR, 10-17-00327-CR, and 10-17-00328-CR. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07;
    
    Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at 525
    n.8; Ex parte 
    Mendenhall, 209 S.W.3d at 261
    ; see also Ex parte Beard,
    2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 8522, at **1-2.
    AL SCOGGINS
    Justice
    Green v. State & Ex parte Green                                                            Page 3
    Before Chief Justice Gray,
    Justice Davis, and
    Justice Scoggins
    Appeals dismissed
    Opinion delivered and filed October 25, 2017
    Do not publish
    [CRPM]
    Green v. State & Ex parte Green                Page 4