Zechariah Lavan Coleman v. State ( 2006 )

                           COURT OF APPEALS

                                       SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                   FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-480-CR

ZECHARIAH LAVAN COLEMAN                                              APPELLANT

                                                   V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                STATE

                                               ----------

            FROM THE 213^TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                               ----------

                  MEMORANDUM OPINION^[1] AND JUDGMENT

                                               ----------

We have considered the AMotion To Dismiss Appeal@ filed by Zechariah Lavan Coleman, pro se.  The motion complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.^[2]  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL D:   WALKER, J., CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: AUGUST 17, 2006

---

^[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4

^[2]Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, and brief in support thereof, stating the appeal is frivolous under the guidelines of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).  Because appellant has voluntarily dismissed his appeal, we need not address counsel=s motion.