Ted William Reemtsma v. State ( 2006 )

REEMTSMA V. STATE

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-05-429-CR

TED WILLIAM REEMTSMA APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION ^{(footnote: 1)}

------------

Ted William Reemtsma appeals the trial court’s judgment revoking his community supervision for felony driving while intoxicated.  In a single issue, appellant complains that the trial court erred by ordering him to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole.  The State concedes that the trial court was without authority to order repayment of a fine as a condition of parole. ^{(footnote: 2)} Accordingly, we sustain appellant’s issue and modify the trial court’s judgment to omit the provision in the judgment requiring appellant to pay a $1000 fine as a condition of parole. ^{(footnote: 3)}  We affirm the trial court’s judgment as modified. ^{(footnote: 4)}

PER CURIAM

PANEL F: CAYCE, C.J.; WALKER and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  August 10, 2006

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2:

See Slaughter v. State, Nos. 02-04-00050-CR, 02-04-00051-CR, 2005 WL 183142, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 27, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication); Green v. State, Nos. 02-03-00377-CR, 02-03-00397-CR, 2005 WL 78326, at *4 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 13, 2005, no pet.) (mem. op.) (not designated for publication) (both holding same).

3:

Belt v. State, 127 S.W.3d 277, 281 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2004, no pet.); Green, 2005 WL 78326, at *4.

4:

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b).