Manuel Hernandez v. State ( 2006 )

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 14, 2006

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 14, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-05-01277-CR

____________

MANUEL HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 174th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1000214

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Manuel Hernandez pled guilty to the offense of intoxication assault without an agreed recommendation from the State on punishment.  On December 1, 2005, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.

Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Appellant filed no pro se response. 

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and we agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed September 14, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Hudson, and Guzman.

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).