Justin Dean Collingwood v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN






    NO. 03-09-00559-CR


    Justin Dean Collingwood, Appellant


    v.



    The State of Texas, Appellee






    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

    NO. 62565, HONORABLE PHILLIP ZEIGLER, JUDGE PRESIDING


    M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N


    A jury found appellant Justin Dean Collingwood guilty of aggravated kidnapping. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 20.04 (West 2003). The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at thirty-five years in prison.

    Appellant's court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel's brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744. No pro se brief has been filed.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel's motion to withdraw is granted.

    The judgment of conviction is affirmed.





    __________________________________________

    Jan P. Patterson, Justice

    Before Justices Patterson, Puryear and Henson

    Affirmed

    Filed: July 1, 2010

    Do Not Publish