R.F. Bearden v. Walton Houston Galleria Office, LP ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January
    9, 2014.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-13-00578-CV
    R.F. BEARDEN, Appellant
    V.
    WALTON HOUSTON GALLERIA OFFICE, LP, Appellee
    On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 959039
    MEMORANDUM                      OPINION
    Appellant R. F. Bearden appeals from a judgment in favor of appellee
    Walton Houston Galleria Office, L.P. On November 21, 2013, appellee filed a
    release of judgment, which provides:
    Plaintiff WALTON HOUSTON GALLERIA, L.P. hereby Releases,
    Relinquishes, and Discharges the Final Judgment signed by the Court
    in this case on April 17, 2013 (“judgment”), which judgment was in
    favor of the Plaintiff and against the Defendant R.F. BEARDEN, and
    Plaintiff WALTON HOUSTON GALLERIA, L.P. hereby Releases,
    Acquits, and Discharges the Defendant R.F. BEARDEN from that
    judgment.
    On December 3, 2013, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot.
    “An unconditional release of judgment operates as a total relinquishment of all
    rights of the judgment creditor in the judgment. It is a complete discharge of the
    debt created by the judgment and a complete surrender of the judgment creditor’s
    rights in the judgment.” Rapp v. Mandell & Wright, P.C., 
    123 S.W.3d 431
    , 435
    (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. denied). Because appellee
    unconditionally released the judgment, we do not have jurisdiction over appellant’s
    appeal. See Crown Life Ins. Co. v. Casteel, 
    22 S.W.3d 378
    , 392 (Tex. 2000).
    Appellant argues that this court has jurisdiction over his appeal because the
    judgment is void and therefore subject to appeal. See State ex rel. Latty v. Owens,
    
    907 S.W.2d 484
    , 486 (Tex. 1995). However, a party affected by void judicial
    action need not appeal. State ex rel Latty v. Owens, 
    907 S.W.2d 484
    , 486
    (Tex.1995). If the judgment is void, it cannot be enforced against appellant, just as
    it cannot be enforced due to appellee’s release. See Custom Corporates, Inc. v. Sec.
    Storage, Inc., 
    207 S.W.3d 835
    , 837 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2006, no
    pet.). Even if this court had jurisdiction over appellant’s appeal and determined the
    judgment is void, the result to appellant is the same.
    Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Brown.
    2