marisela-g-salas-individually-and-as-representative-of-the-estate-of ( 2014 )


Menu:
  •                                                                        Allen Keller Co. I, L.L.C.
    d/b/a Allen Keller /s
    Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    October 20, 2014
    No. 04-14-00622-CV
    Marisela G. SALAS, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Martin Suarez and as
    Next Friend of Keyla Marizel Salas Suares, Minor,
    Appellants
    v.
    ALLEN KELLER CO. I, L.L.C. d/b/a Allen Keller Co.,
    Appellee
    From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 13410
    Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    In this appeal, appellant appeals a judgment signed June 9, 2014. Accordingly, the notice
    of appeal was due July 9, 2014, or a motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was
    due fifteen days later on July 24, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 26.3. The record contains a
    notice of appeal file stamped July 11, 2014. The notice of appeal contains a certificate of service
    stating the notice of appeal was served on appellee by mail on July 9, 2014; however, it does not
    state it was filed by mail with the district clerk on that same date. Appellant did not file a motion
    for extension of time to file the notice of appeal.
    A notice of appeal may appear to be late if filed by mail pursuant to rule 9.2(b) of the
    Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.2(b); Lofton v. Allstate Ins. Co., 
    895 S.W.2d 693
    (Tex. 1995). Additionally, a motion for extension of time is necessarily implied
    when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule
    26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by rule 26.3 for filing a motion for
    extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 615 (Tex. 1997). However, the
    appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file timely the notice of appeal. See
    id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C); Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc., 
    774 S.W.2d 668
    ,
    670 (Tex. 1989).
    We therefore order that appellant may file, on or before October 30, 2014, a response
    establishing that the notice of appeal was timely filed by mail or offering a reasonable
    explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal timely. If appellant
    fails to satisfactorily respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. 42.3(c). If a supplemental clerk’s record is required, appellant must ask the district clerk
    to prepare one and must notify the clerk of this court that such a request was made. All deadlines
    in this matter are suspended until further order of this court.
    ___________________________________
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 20th day of October, 2014.
    ___________________________________
    Keith E. Hottle
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-14-00622-CV

Filed Date: 10/20/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/1/2016