Marvin Ray Haile v. State of Texas ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed July 22, 2010
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-10-00140-CR
    __________
    MARVIN RAY HAILE, Appellant
    V.
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 259th District Court
    Jones County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CR023655
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Marvin Ray Haile pleaded guilty on May 21, 2008, to the offense of harassment. The
    trial court deferred the adjudication of his guilt, placed him on community supervision for two
    years, and assessed a fine of $100. On October 24, 2008, the State filed a motion to adjudicate
    guilt. Upon appellant’s plea of “true” to the allegations in the motion to adjudicate, the trial
    court entered its Final Adjudication Order of Probation on December 17, 2008, wherein it
    revoked appellant’s community supervision, adjudicated his guilt, and sentenced him to
    confinement for a term of 120 days in jail. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    The trial court imposed the sentence in open court on December 17, 2008. Appellant
    filed his pro se notice of appeal in the trial court on June 8, 2010, over seventeen months after
    the date the sentence was imposed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2 requires that a notice of appeal must be
    filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed in open court or within ninety days after the
    sentence is imposed in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial.1
    Accordingly, the notice of appeal is not timely.2 Furthermore, a motion for extension of time to
    file the notice of appeal was not filed in compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. Absent a timely
    notice of appeal or compliance with Rule 26.3, this court lacks jurisdiction to entertain an appeal.
    Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522-24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 
    860 S.W.2d 108
    , 109-10 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 1993); Shute v. State, 
    744 S.W.2d 96
    , 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).
    The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. All pending motions in this appeal are
    overruled.
    PER CURIAM
    July 22, 2010
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    McCall, J., and Strange, J.
    1
    A motion for new trial must be filed within thirty days after the trial court imposes sentence in open court. TEX. R.
    APP. P. 21.4.
    2
    Appellant states in his docketing statement that he also filed notices of appeal on February 5, 2010; April 2, 2010; and
    May 11, 2010. These purported notices of appeal are also untimely filed.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-10-00140-CR

Filed Date: 7/22/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015