Rosalio Carrera v. State of Texas ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed July 8, 2010
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-10-00164-CR
    __________
    ROSALIO CARRERA, Appellant
    V.
    STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 238th District Court
    Midland County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CR35132
    MEMORANDUM                 OPINION
    The trial court convicted Rosalio Carrera, upon his plea of guilty, of indecency with a
    child. Pursuant to the plea bargain agreement, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement
    for two years. We dismiss the appeal.
    The trial court imposed the sentence in open court on January 13, 2010. On June 10,
    2010, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. This court notified the parties that the notice of
    appeal was not timely and directed appellant to file a response showing grounds for continuing
    the appeal. Appellant has filed a response.
    In his response, appellant contends that he was interviewed without properly being
    informed of his rights, that he was not appointed a bilingual attorney, that the evidence was
    questionable because his son-in-law was a drug user, that the prosecutor had him sign a
    document outside the presence of his attorney, that he had been held in violation of his right to a
    speedy trial, that he only signed the plea bargain agreement to be released from incarceration,
    that his plea was not voluntary, and that he has been denied due process of law. Appellant does
    not address the untimeliness of his notice of appeal or whether this court’s jurisdiction has been
    invoked.
    Absent a timely notice of appeal or compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, this court lacks
    jurisdiction to entertain an appeal. Slaton v. State, 
    981 S.W.2d 208
    , 209-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998);
    Olivo v. State, 
    918 S.W.2d 519
    , 522-24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 
    860 S.W.2d 108
    ,
    109-10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State, 
    744 S.W.2d 96
    , 97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).
    Appellant may be able to secure an out-of-time appeal by filing a postconviction writ pursuant to
    TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon 2009).
    The appeal is dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    July 8, 2010
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
    McCall, J., and Strange, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-10-00164-CR

Filed Date: 7/8/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015