Clinton Stevenson v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

    IN THE

    TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

     

    No. 10-09-00358-CR

     

    Clinton Stevenson,

                                                                                        Appellant

     v.

     

    The State of Texas,

                                                                                        Appellee

     

     

       


    From the 52nd District Court

    Coryell County, Texas

    Trial Court No. Fam-08-19632

     

    ORDER

     


    In an order dated August 11, 2010, the Court abated this case for a hearing in the trial court to determine:  (1) why a brief (which was originally due on or before July 9, 2010) has not been filed on Appellant’s behalf; (2) whether Appellant’s attorney has abandoned the appeal; and (3) whether Appellant is receiving effective assistance of counsel.  The trial court held the hearing on August 23, 2010.

    The Court has received a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing.  The trial court found that Appellant’s attorney has not abandoned the appeal, that Appellant is -receiving effective assistance of counsel, and that there is good cause for why Appellant’s brief has not been filed.

    This Court notes that no explanation for why Appellant’s brief had not been timely filed (on or before July 9, 2010) was given.

    This case is reinstated.  Appellant’s brief shall be filed on or before September 27, 2010 (five weeks after August 23).

     

    PER CURIAM

     

    Before Chief Justice Gray,

    Justice Reyna, and

    Justice Davis

    Appeal reinstated

    Order issued and filed September 15, 2010

    Do not publish

     

    (appellate cause no. 10-02-270-CR) without the benefit of a plea bargain. Harris likewise pleaded guilty to possession of alprazolam in the amount of 28 grams or more but less than 200 grams in trial court cause no. 83788 (appellate cause no. 10-02-271-CR) without the benefit of a plea bargain. The court sentenced Harris to five years’ imprisonment in both cases.

          Harris and his trial counsel signed a waiver of appeal in both cases. Because Harris waived his right to appeal, we dismiss his appeals. Blanco v. State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219-20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Clayburn v. State, 985 S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. App.—Waco 1999, no pet.) (per curiam).


                                                                       PER CURIAM


    Before Chief Justice Davis,

          Justice Vance, and

          Justice Gray

    Appeal dismissed

    Opinion delivered and filed October 30, 2002

    Do not publish

    [CR25]

Document Info

Docket Number: 10-09-00358-CR

Filed Date: 9/15/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015