in Re Noe De Los Santos, Joe Avalos, Rudy Rivera, and Ruben Vaiz ( 2012 )

NUMBER 13-12-00001-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE NOE DE LOS SANTOS, JOE AVALOS, RUDY RIVERA, AND
RUBEN VAIZ
On Verified Petition for Writ of Injunction and Emergency Motion for
Injunctive Relief Pendente Lite.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
Relators, Noe De Los Santos, Joe Avalos, Rudy Rivera, and Ruben Vaiz, filed a
verified petition for writ of injunction and emergency motion for injunctive relief pendente
lite in the above cause on January 3, 2012, requesting that this Court grant a temporary
injunction enjoining the City of Robstown from proceeding with a trial that is set in the
250th District Court of Travis County, Texas. The Court requested and received a
1
See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is
not required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
response to the petition for writ of injunction and emergency motion from the opposing
party, the City of Robstown.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the verified petition for writ of
injunction and emergency motion for injunctive relief pendente lite, and the response
thereto, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief
sought. See, e.g., TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 1205.025, 1205.061 (West 2000); see also
Buckholts Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Glaser, 632 S.W.2d 146, 149 (Tex. 1982); Hotze v. City of
Houston, 339 S.W.3d 809, 814 (Tex. App.—Austin 2011, no pet.); Rio Grande Valley
Sugar Growers, Inc. v. Attorney Gen. of Tex., 670 S.W.2d 399, 401 (Tex. App.—Austin
1984, writ ref'd n.r.e.).
Accordingly, the petition and emergency motion are DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 17th
day of January, 2012.