Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. and Gulf Island, L.L.C. v. Lucinda F. Flores ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                             NUMBER 13-10-00197-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    GULF ISLAND FABRICATION, INC. AND
    GULF ISLAND, L.L.C.,                                                      Appellants,
    v.
    LUCINDA F. FLORES, ET AL.,                         Appellees.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the 156th District Court
    of San Patricio County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides
    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
    Appellants, Gulf Island Fabrication, Inc. and Gulf Island, L.L.C., perfected an
    appeal from a judgment entered by the 156th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas,
    in cause number S-08-5392-CV-B. The parties have filed a joint motion to reverse the
    judgment and remand to the district court on grounds that all matters in controversy
    between them in this cause have been fully compromised and settled. The parties
    request that we reverse the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand
    the case for implementation of settlement.
    The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to reverse
    and remand, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.1(a).   Accordingly, the joint motion is granted.    We REVERSE the trial court=s
    judgment without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court for further
    proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement.            See TEX. R. APP. P.
    42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d).
    Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent
    agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”).      Having
    reversed the trial court’s judgment and remanded the case at the parties’ request, no
    motion for rehearing will be entertained.
    Furthermore, the parties request immediate issuance of our mandate. See TEX.
    R. APP. P. 18.1(c). The motion is GRANTED. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue
    the mandate immediately. See 
    id. PER CURIAM
    Delivered and filed the
    16th day of June, 2011.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-10-00197-CV

Filed Date: 6/16/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015