Gabriel Owoso & Aramide Owoso v. Leawood Homeowners Association, Nafisa Yahoob, Independent Management Investment LLC and Sabrina Siddiqi ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •   

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                           NUMBER 13-11-00187-CV

     

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

     

                         THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                             CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

    ____________________________________________________________

     

    GABRIEL OWOSO AND ARAMIDE OWOSO,                  APPELLANTS,

     

                                                                 v.

     

    LEAWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

    NAFISA YAQOOB, INDEPENDENT MANAGEMENT

    INVESTMENT LLC AND SABRINA SIDDIQI,                       APPELLEES.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                       On appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

                                              of Harris County, Texas.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

                 Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

     


    Appellants, Gabriel Owoso and Aramide Owoso, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 944520.  Appellants have filed a motion to withdraw the notice of appeal on grounds that the judgment in the underlying case was vacated.  Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

    The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants= motion to withdraw the notice of appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  Appellants= motion to withdraw the notice of appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.  Costs will be taxed against appellants. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellants= request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

     

    PER CURIAM

    Delivered and filed the

    16th day of June, 2011.

     

     

     

     

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-11-00187-CV

Filed Date: 6/16/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015