Jack McCullough v. William P. Dornsife, Waste Control Specialists, LLC and Hertz Vehicles, LLC ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                      COURT OF APPEALS
    EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    EL PASO, TEXAS
    JACK McCULLOUGH,                                  §
    No. 08-09-00300-CV
    Appellant,                    §
    Appeal from the
    v.                                                §
    109th District Court
    WILLIAM P. DORNSIFE, WASTE                        §
    CONTROL SPECIALISTS, LLC AND                                    of Andrews County, Texas
    HERTZ VEHICLES, LLC,                              §
    (TC# 17,307)
    Appellees.                    §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This appeal is before the Court on its own motion for determination of whether it should be
    dismissed for want of prosecution. Finding that Appellant has failed to file a brief, we dismiss the
    appeal.
    We possess the authority to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appealing
    party has failed to file his brief in the time prescribed, and gives no reasonable explanation for such
    failure. TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); Elizondo v. City of San Antonio, 
    975 S.W.2d 61
    , 63 (Tex. App.
    – San Antonio 1998, no writ). Appellant filed notice of appeal on November 19, 2009, and the
    clerk’s record and reporter’s record were filed on March 11, 2010. Therefore, Appellant’s brief or
    at the very least, an extension to file his brief, was due in this Court on April 10, 2010. See TEX . R.
    APP . P. 38.6(a) (providing that Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days from the date the record
    is filed). To date Appellant has failed to file either.
    We notified Appellant by letter dated April 27, 2010, that it appeared he no longer wished
    to prosecute the appeal because he had not filed his brief or a motion for extension of time by the
    due date. We further informed Appellant of our intention to dismiss the appeal unless he could show
    grounds for continuing the appeal within ten days from the date of the notice. Appellant has not filed
    his brief, a motion for extension of time, or any response to our inquiry. Therefore, we assume
    Appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. As a result, we dismiss the appeal for want of
    prosecution pursuant to TEX . R. APP . P. 42.3(c) and 38.8(a)(1).
    GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice
    July 14, 2010
    Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 08-09-00300-CV

Filed Date: 7/14/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015