Christopher Michael Alderete v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                      NO. 07-10-0429-CR
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    AT AMARILLO
    PANEL C
    NOVEMBER 23, 2010
    ______________________________
    CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL ALDERETE, APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
    _________________________________
    FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;
    NO. 58,716-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE
    _______________________________
    Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Christopher Michael Alderete, entered a plea of true to the State's
    allegations in its motion to proceed with adjudication of guilt after having been granted
    deferred adjudication community supervision for the offense of assault on a family
    member1. After hearing evidence that Appellant had violated the terms and conditions
    of community supervision, the trial court adjudicated him guilty and sentenced him to
    1
    Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.01(b)(2) (Vernon Supp. 2010).
    fifteen years confinement. The Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right to Appeal
    indicates that Appellant's case was a plea-bargain case with no right of appeal and that
    Appellant waived his right of appeal.
    By letter dated October 21, 2010, this Court notified Appellant of the
    consequences of the certification and invited him to either file an amended certification
    showing a right of appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal on or
    before November 10, 2010. Appellant was also notified that failure to do so might result
    in dismissal of the appeal pursuant to Rule 25.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate
    Procedure.
    In response to this Court's letter, Appellant filed a "Motion for Extension of Time"
    on his appeal to seek help from outside sources. He also expressed an intent to file a
    petition for discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Appellant's
    response, however, does not contradict the trial court's certification. Appellant also
    failed to file an amended certification reflecting a right of appeal and did not show cause
    for continuing his appeal.     Consequently, this appeal is dismissed based on the
    certification signed by the trial court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).
    Patrick A. Pirtle
    Justice
    Do not publish.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 07-10-00429-CR

Filed Date: 11/23/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015