Region One Education Service Center and Jack C. Damron v. Alma Doffing ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •  

     

     

     

     

     

                                                         NUMBERS

    13-10-00120-CV

    13-10-00121-CV

     

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

     

                         THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                             CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

     

      

     

    REGION ONE EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER

    AND JACK C. DAMRON,                                                            Appellants,

     

                                                                 v.

     

    ALMA DOFFING,                                                                             Appellee.

     

      

     

                         On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

                                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

     

      

     

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

    Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

     

    Appellants, Region One Education Service Center and Jack C. Damron, perfected appeals from judgments entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-09-3695-D. On May 24, 2010, this Court issued an order consolidating appeals and abating the case for mediation.  The Court hereby REINSTATES the appeals.  Appellants have filed unopposed motions to dismiss the appeals on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeals. 

    The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motions to dismiss the appeals, is of the opinion that the motions should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants’ motions to dismiss are granted, and the appeals are hereby DISMISSED.  In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeals at appellants’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.  Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.      

     

    PER CURIAM

    Delivered and filed the

    23rd day of September, 2010.

     

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-10-00121-CV

Filed Date: 9/23/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015