Jose Valdez v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •  

      

     

     

     

     

     

                                                                 

                                           NUMBER 13-09-00096-CR

     

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

     

                         THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                             CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

    ____________________________________________________________

     

    JOSE VALDEZ,                                                                              Appellant,

     

                                                                 v.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                 Appellee.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                               On appeal from the 347th District Court

    of Nueces County, Texas.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                                          MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

    Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

     

    Appellant, Jose Valdez, was convicted of aggravated sexual assault.  On February 18, 2010, appellant filed a notice of appeal by and through his appointed counsel.  Appellant’s counsel has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  According to the motion, appellant is not able to read and has returned counsel’s letters unopened. Appellant has advised counsel of his desire to withdraw his appeal by telephone on September 8, 2010, but when counsel asked if appellant would sign a form stating his desires, appellant responded that he could not read the form and did not trust anyone to read it to him.

    Although no written motion has been filed in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case in accordance with Rule 2.  See Tex. R. App. P. 2.  Based upon counsel’s sworn statements, counsel’s motion is granted and the appeal is DISMISSED.    

    PER CURIAM

    Do not publish. 

    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b). 

    Delivered and filed the

    23rd day of September, 2010.

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-09-00096-CR

Filed Date: 9/23/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015