Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., James E. Holland and David C. Holland v. Denbury Green Pipeline-Texas, LLC and Mike Latta ( 2012 )

Opinion issued June 28, 2012.
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
————————————
NO. 01-12-00453-CV
———————————
TEXAS RICE LAND PARTNERS, LTD., JAMES E. HOLLAND, AND
DAVID C. HOLLAND, Appellants
V.
DENBURY GREEN-PIPELINE TEXAS, LTD. AND MIKE LATTA,
Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
Jefferson County, Texas
Trial Court Case No. 114012
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd., James E. Holland, and David C. Holland
brought this restricted appeal from a trial court’s order confirming the award of the
commissioners in a condemnation proceeding. To prevail on a restricted appeal, a
party must show: (1) it filed notice of the restricted appeal within six months after
the judgment was signed; (2) it was a party to the underlying lawsuit; (3) it did not
participate in the hearing that resulted in the judgment complained of and did not
timely file any post-decree motions or requests for findings of fact and conclusions
of law; and (4) error is apparent on the face of the record. Ins. Co. of Pa. v.
Lejeune, 297 S.W.3d 254, 255 (Tex. 2009); see TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(c), 30.
The parties have not yet briefed this case, but they have submitted an agreed
statement of the case. See TEX. R. APP. 34.3. According to the agreed statement of
the case and this court’s review of the record, all four requirements for relief in a
restricted appeal have been met: appellants filed a notice of appeal within six
months of the date the judgment was signed, appellants were parties to the lawsuit,
appellants did not participate in a hearing or trial because none was held, and there
is error on the face of the record because judgment was entered without any notice
of a trial or dispositive hearing being given to any party. See Peralta v. Heights
Med. Ctr., Inc., 485 U.S. 80, 84, 108 S. Ct. 896, 899 (1988) (stating that failure to
give notice of proceeding that will be accorded finality is violation of due process);
TEX. R. CIV. P. 245 (providing for mandatory forty-five day notice of a trial setting
in contested cases); Ramsey v. Davis, 261 S.W.3d 811, 815 (Tex. App.—Dallas
2008, pet. denied) (stating failure to give notice of trial setting violates due
2
process). We therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this
cause for further proceedings. All pending motions are denied as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Sharp, and Huddle.
3