Carter & Burgess, Inc. and Carter & Burgess, Inc. D/B/A Jacobs Carter Burgess v. Crosstex North Texas Gathering, L.P. ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •                         COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-10-00189-CV
    CARTER & BURGESS, INC. AND                                       APPELLANTS
    CARTER & BURGESS, INC. D/B/A
    JACOBS CARTER BURGESS
    V.
    CROSSTEX NORTH TEXAS                                                APPELLEE
    GATHERING, L.P.
    ------------
    FROM THE 43RD DISTRICT COURT OF PARKER COUNTY
    ------------
    OPINION ON REHEARING
    ------------
    Appellants Carter & Burgess, Inc., and Carter & Burgess, Inc. d/b/a Jacobs
    Carter Burgess (collectively, Carter Burgess) filed an unopposed motion for
    rehearing and an agreed motion to withdraw our previous opinion and remand
    the case to the trial court. The motion for rehearing is denied. The motion to
    withdraw our opinion is granted.    We withdraw our opinion and judgment of
    March 24, 2011, and we substitute the following.
    The parties in this case have reached a settlement. In an effort to facilitate
    the parties’ settlement, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to
    the merits and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in
    accordance with the agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative
    Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 
    911 S.W.2d 387
    , 388 (Tex. 1995); Bonney v. Scott,
    No. 2-08-00124-CV, 
    2009 WL 1905137
    (Tex. App.—Fort Worth, Jul. 2, 2009, no
    pet.) (mem. op.). Costs of this appeal shall be paid by the party incurring same,
    for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
    LEE GABRIEL
    JUSTICE
    PANEL: GARDNER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.
    DELIVERED: June 9, 2011
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-10-00189-CV

Filed Date: 6/9/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015