Carter & Burgess, Inc. and Carter & Burgess, Inc. D/B/A Jacobs Carter Burgess v. Crosstex North Texas Gathering, L.P. ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • 02-10-189-CV


    COURT OF APPEALS

    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

    FORT WORTH

     

     

    NO. 02-10-00189-CV

     

     

    Carter & Burgess, Inc. and Carter & Burgess, Inc. d/b/a Jacobs Carter Burgess

     

    APPELLANTS

     

    V.

     

    Crosstex North Texas Gathering, L.P.

     

    APPELLEE

     

     

    ------------

     

    FROM THE 43rd District Court OF Parker COUNTY

    ------------

    OPINION ON REHEARING

    ------------

     

    Appellants Carter & Burgess, Inc., and Carter & Burgess, Inc. d/b/a Jacobs Carter Burgess (collectively, Carter Burgess) filed an unopposed motion for rehearing and an agreed motion to withdraw our previous opinion and remand the case to the trial court.  The motion for rehearing is denied.  The motion to withdraw our opinion is granted.  We withdraw our opinion and judgment of March 24, 2011, and we substitute the following.

    The parties in this case have reached a settlement.  In an effort to facilitate the parties’ settlement, we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W.2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995); Bonney v. Scott, No. 2-08-00124-CV, 2009 WL 1905137 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth, Jul. 2, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.).  Costs of this appeal shall be paid by the party incurring same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

     

    LEE GABRIEL

    JUSTICE

     

    PANEL: GARDNER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

     

    DELIVERED: June 9, 2011

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-10-00189-CV

Filed Date: 6/9/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015