South Texas College v. Curtis Roberson ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                           NUMBER 13-10-00286-CV

     

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

     

                         THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                             CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

    ____________________________________________________________

     

    SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE,                                                                   Appellant,

     

                                                                 v.                               

     

    CURTIS ROBERSON,                                                                            Appellee.

     

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                              On Appeal from the 139th District Court 

                                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

    Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Garza

    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

     


    Appellant, South Texas College, attempts to appeal an order denying a plea to the jurisdiction entered against it on May 17, 2010.  Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for involuntary dismissal on grounds that the Court should dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

    The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss is GRANTED and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at appellant=s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

     

    PER CURIAM

    Delivered and filed the  

    29th day of July, 2010.

     

     

     

     

     

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-10-00286-CV

Filed Date: 7/29/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015