Cedarcide Industries, Inc. v. Melinda Poole ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •   

     

     

     

     

     

     

                                           NUMBER 13-10-00167-CV

     

                                     COURT OF APPEALS

     

                         THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

     

                             CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

    ____________________________________________________________

     

    CEDARCIDE INDUSTRIES, INC.,                                               Appellant,

     

                                                                 v.

     

    MELINDA POOLE,                                                                          Appellee.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                                 On appeal from the 9th District Court

                                      of Montgomery County, Texas.

    ____________________________________________________________

     

                                   MEMORANDUM OPINION

     

                         Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

    Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

     


    Appellant, Cedarcide Industries, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 9th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, in cause number 06-10-10512-CV. The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise its differences in this appeal.  The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal. 

    The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).  The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. 

    The parties request that the Court order the bond released. The motion is GRANTED.  We order the trial court to release appellant’s bond.  Costs will be taxed against appellant. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.").  Having dismissed the appeal at the parties= request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

     

    PER CURIAM

    Delivered and filed the  

    8th day of July, 2010.        

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-10-00167-CV

Filed Date: 7/8/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015