in the Interest of B. F., a Child v. Department of Family and Protective Services ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued June 30, 2011

      

    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

    ————————————

    NO. 01-10-00808-CV

    ———————————

    In the Interest of B.F, a child

     

     

    On Appeal from the 313th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 2010-00600J

     

     

    MEMORANDUM OPINION

              Appellant, Angelina Mayling Flores a/k/a Angelina Munoz, has neither established indigence nor paid all the required fees for this appeal to proceed.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless appellant is indigent); see also Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2010) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in Tex. R. App. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals).  She also has not arranged for the preparation and filing of an appellate record.  See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a), (b) (conditioning preparation of clerk’s and reporter’s records on satisfactory arrangements for payment, unless appellant is indigent).

              This Court has twice notified Ms. Munoz that this appeal was subject to dismissal, once for nonpayment of fees and once for failure to arrange for a record. On both occasions, we referred Ms. Munoz to the appropriate appellate rule by which she could claim indigence in this Court.  See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence).  Ms. Munoz has made no claim of indigence in this Court, and she has not otherwise adequately responded to the notices that the appeal is eligible for dismissal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). 

              Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 

              We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-10-00808-CV

Filed Date: 6/30/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015