John Roy Alexander v. State ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Opinion issued June 23, 2011

     

     

     

     

     

     

    In The

    Court of Appeals

    For The

    First District of Texas

     

     


    NO. 01-11-00446-CR

    ____________

     


    JOHN ROY ALEXANDER, Appellant

     

    V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

         

    On Appeal from the 174th District Court

    Harris County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 1263948

     

      

     


    MEMORANDUM OPINION


              Appellant, John Roy Alexander, pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery involving bodily injury.  The trial court found appellant guilty, and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea bargain agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to 12 years’ confinement.  Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.  We dismiss the appeal.

    In a plea bargain case, a defendant may appeal only those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  An appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

    Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id.  The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and that the defendant has no right of appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  Appellant did not appeal any pre-trial matters, and the trial court did not give permission for appellant to appeal. The record supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must dismiss this appeal.  See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  All pending motions are dismissed as moot.

    PER CURIAM

    Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Bland, and Massengale.

     

    Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-11-00446-CR

Filed Date: 6/23/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015