in Re Marty Flores, Relator ( 2011 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-11-00386-CR
IN RE Marty FLORES
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Rebecca Simmons, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 29, 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On June 2, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial
court’s failure to rule on his various pro se motions. However, counsel has been appointed to
represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently
confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State,
240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with
regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson,
240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule
1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CR-2855, styled State of Texas v. Marty Flores, pending in the
379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
04-11-00390-CR
on relator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-