in Re Killam Ranch Properties, Ltd., Relator ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                                  MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-10-00692-CV
    IN RE KILLAM RANCH PROPERTIES, LTD.
    Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Karen Angelini, Justice
    Rebecca Simmons, Justice
    Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: November 17, 2010
    PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
    On September 24, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, asserting: (1) the
    trial court lacked jurisdiction to cancel the lis pendens, and (2) the trial court erred in cancelling
    the lis pendens while an appeal is pending and without requiring security or an undertaking.
    This court ordered the respondent and/or real parties in interest to file a response to the petition,
    and responses were filed with this court on October 14, 2010.
    Relator has also filed an appeal in Cause No. 04-10-00324-CV, which appeals the trial
    court’s order granting summary judgment to Webb County and denying summary judgment to
    Killam Ranch, the award of attorney’s fees, and the cancelling of the lis pendens. On October
    1
    This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007-CVQ-001680-D3, Killam Ranch Properties, Ltd. v. Webb County,
    Texas, in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Michael Peden, visiting judge
    presiding.
    04-10-00692-CV
    21, 2010, relator filed a supplemental brief in Cause No. 04-10-00324-CV. As a result, the
    appeal now encompasses all of the issues addressed in the petition for writ of mandamus.
    In order to be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show the trial court clearly
    abused its discretion and the relator has no adequate remedy at law. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of
    Am., 
    148 S.W.3d 124
    , 135 (Tex. 2004); Walker v. Packer, 
    827 S.W.2d 833
    , 839-40 (Tex. 1992).
    The court has determined that relator has failed to establish it does not have an adequate remedy
    by appeal. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    52.8(a).
    PER CURIAM
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-10-00692-CV

Filed Date: 11/17/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015