Corey J. Dukes v. State ( 2010 )

MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00068-CR
Corey J. DUKES,
Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas,
Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2006-CR-4699
Honorable Mary D. Román, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 15, 2010
AFFIRMED
Appellant, Cory J. Dukes, pled no contest to the charge of possession of a controlled
substance. Appellant’s sentence was suspended and he was placed on community supervision
for two years. Later, the State moved to revoke appellant’s community supervision. At a
hearing on the motion to revoke, appellant pled “true” to violating a condition of his community
supervision. On appeal, appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a
professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be
04-10-00068-CR
advanced. Counsel concludes the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Appellant was informed of his right to review the
record. Counsel provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a
pro se brief. Appellant has not filed a brief. After reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal
is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, and we
GRANT appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.
App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San
Antonio 1996, no pet.).
Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Do not publish
-2-