-
• • • • • •
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-10-00612-CR
IN RE Terrance FLETCHER
Original Mandamus Proceeding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 8, 2010
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On August 24, 2010, relator Terrance Fletcher filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court’s failure to grant his pro se motions for speedy trial. However, counsel has been retained by relator to represent him in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to rule on relator’s pro se motion filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition is denied. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
Document Info
Docket Number: 04-10-00612-CR
Filed Date: 9/8/2010
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/16/2015