Andres Pena v. State ( 2010 )


Menu:
  • i          i      i                                                                 i     i      i
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    No. 04-10-00445-CR
    Andres PENA,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 2009-CR-7295
    Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding
    PER CURIAM
    Sitting:          Catherine Stone, Chief Justice
    Steven C. Hilbig, Justice
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    Delivered and Filed: July 21, 2010
    DISMISSED
    Andres Pena pleaded nolo contendere to the offense of felon in possession of a firearm
    pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea bargain, Pena signed a separate “Waiver
    of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-
    bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of
    appeal.” See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(a)(2). Pena timely filed a notice of appeal. The clerk’s record,
    04-10-00445-CR
    which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been
    filed. See TEX . R. APP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows
    the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” 
    Id. The court
    gave Pena notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court
    certification showing he has the right to appeal were made part of the appellate record within thirty
    days. See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 
    110 S.W.3d 174
    (Tex. App.–San Antonio
    2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 
    2003 WL 21508347
    (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d)
    (not designated for publication). Pena’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written response, stating
    she has reviewed the record and can find no right of appeal. After reviewing the record and
    counsel’s notice, we agree that Pena does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine
    whether trial court’s certification is accurate). We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX . R. APP . P.
    25.2(d).
    PER CURIAM
    Do not publish
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-10-00445-CR

Filed Date: 7/21/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/16/2015