Octavio Alvarez v. Sergio Molina D/B/A Narse Construction ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                            NUMBER 13-17-00086-CV
    COURT OF APPEALS
    THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
    ____________________________________________________________
    OCTAVIO ALVAREZ,                                                         Appellant,
    v.
    SERGIO MOLINA D/B/A
    NARSE CONSTRUCTION,                                 Appellee.
    ____________________________________________________________
    On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7
    of Hidalgo County, Texas.
    ____________________________________________________________
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Justices Contreras, Longoria, and Hinojosa
    Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
    Appellant Octavio Alvarez appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his suit
    against appellee Sergio Molina d/b/a Narse Construction for want of prosecution. This
    Court previously abated the appeal to allow the parties to effectuate a settlement
    agreement.    The parties have now filed a joint motion to enter agreed judgment.
    Pursuant to the agreement, the parties request this Court to render judgment effectuating
    the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The parties have agreed that
    this Court should reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment in favor of
    appellant and against appellee in the amount of $17,000.00. The parties further agree
    that all costs of the appeal will be taxed against the party incurring same.
    The Court, having considered the documents on file and joint motion to enter
    agreed judgment, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we
    REINSTATE this appeal. We GRANT the parties’ joint motion to enter agreed judgment.
    We REVERSE the trial court’s judgment, RENDER judgment in favor of appellant and
    against appellee in the amount of $17,000.00, and DISMISS the appeal.            See 
    id. Pursuant to
    the parties’ agreement, the costs of the appeal will be taxed against the
    incurring party. See 
    id. 42.1(d). Having
    dismissed the appeal at the parties' request,
    no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. We
    dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
    LETICIA HINOJOSA
    Justice
    Delivered and filed the
    9th day of August, 2018.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 13-17-00086-CV

Filed Date: 8/9/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/9/2018