Harold Wayne Mitchell v. State ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed October 3, 2019
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ____________
    No. 11-19-00277-CR
    ____________
    HAROLD WAYNE MITCHELL, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 238th District Court
    Midland County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CR43869
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Harold Wayne Mitchell, filed a pro se notice of appeal related to
    his request for a judgment nunc pro tunc. Appellant sought to have the trial court
    enter a judgment nunc pro tunc with respect to the attorney’s fees associated with
    this cause. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction, but we note that the trial
    court has now entered an order in which it granted Appellant’s motion for judgment
    nunc pro tunc and that the trial court has amended the bill of costs to delete the
    $1,100.00 in attorney’s fees and $22.50 of the $25.00 time payment fee.
    When the appeal was filed in this court, we notified Appellant by letter that
    the order from which he attempted to appeal did not appear to be a final, appealable
    order. We requested that Appellant respond and show grounds to continue, and we
    informed him that this appeal may be dismissed. Appellant filed a response but has
    not shown grounds upon which this appeal may continue.
    An intermediate appellate court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from an
    order denying a request for judgment nunc pro tunc because such an order is not an
    appealable order. Gonzalez v. State, No. 11-17-00056-CR, 
    2017 WL 1275540
    , at *1
    (Tex. App.—Eastland Mar. 31, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
    publication); Sims v. State, No. 05-14-01438-CR, 
    2014 WL 6453607
    , at *1 (Tex.
    App.—Dallas Nov. 18, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication);
    Sanchez v. State, 
    112 S.W.3d 311
    , 312 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2003, no pet.);
    Everett v. State, 
    82 S.W.3d 735
    (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d). Thus, we
    have no jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.
    We dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    October 3, 2019
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
    Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1
    Willson, J., not participating.
    1
    Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
    sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-19-00277-CR

Filed Date: 10/3/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/5/2019