in the Interest of A.T.N.J, A.J., and T.L.J., Jr. ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                                 COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
    FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
    ORDER
    Appellate case name:         In the Interest of A.T.N.J., A.J., and T.L.J., Jr., Children
    Appellate case number:       01-15-00844-CV
    Trial court case number:     2013-33236
    Trial court:                 311th District Court of Harris County
    On November 24, 2015, the Clerk of this Court forwarded the pro se affidavit of
    indigence for appellate costs filed by appellant, T.L.J., Sr., to the trial clerk requesting an
    indigent clerk’s record be filed in this Court by December 23, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P.
    20.1(c)(1). On November 30, 2015, the court reporters filed info sheets in this Court
    noting that there were no reporter’s records taken. On February 17, 2016, the trial clerk
    filed an information sheet in this Court stating that there was no contest to appellant’s
    affidavit of indigence filed in the trial court due to the late filing. See id. 20.1(e)(1). On
    March 9, 2016, the trial clerk filed the original clerk’s record in this Court.
    Accordingly, the allegations in the affidavit of indigence are deemed true, and
    appellant is entitled to proceed without advance payment of appellate costs. See TEX. R.
    APP. P. at 20.1(f). However, because there is no reporter’s record and the clerk’s record
    has already been filed in this Court, the Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to deem the
    appellant indigent and that he is allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment
    of costs for purposes of the appellate filing fee and the clerk’s and reporter’s record fees.
    Furthermore, this Court generally has appellate jurisdiction over appeals only from
    final orders arising under the Texas Family Code unless a statute authorizes an
    interlocutory appeal. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.002(b) (West S u p p . 2015) (“An
    appeal may be taken by any party to a suit from a final order rendered under this
    title.”). Thus, to the extent appellant intended that his notice of appeal, challenging the
    trial court’s refusal to act, be construed as a mandamus petition, appellant’s counsel is
    directed to file a motion with the Clerk of this Court within 10 days of the date of the
    Order to designate his appeal as an original proceeding and requesting an extension of
    time to file a petition that complies with Rule 52. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1, 52.3.
    It is so ORDERED.
    Judge’s signature:   /s/ Laura Carter Higley
     Acting individually
    Date: March 15, 2016
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00844-CV

Filed Date: 3/15/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 3/15/2016