Grandeye Limited v. Google Inc. ( 2016 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GRANDEYE LIMITED, Appellant v. GOOGLE INC., Appellee ______________________ 2015-1622, 2015-1624, 2015-1625 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00546, IPR2013-00547, IPR2013-00548. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ STEPHEN YEE CHOW, Burns & Levinson, LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also repre- sented by EMILY CURTIS JOHNSON, DAVID VONDLE, ZE-WEN JULIUS CHEN, CONO A. CARRANO, ASHRAF FAWZY. JEREMIAH HELM, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, STACY BETH MARGOLIES. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 28, 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court