United States v. Queen , 32 F. App'x 106 ( 2002 )

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6284
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
NICHOLAS J. QUEEN, SR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.
(CR-93-366)
Submitted: March 20, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas J. Queen, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Nicholas J. Queen appeals the district court’s order denying
his petition for writ of error coram nobis, which the district
court properly construed as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001)
motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Queen,
No. CR-93-366 (D. Md. Jan. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2