William Carr v. Atlas GC Worldwide, LLC ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 25, 2018
    S   In The
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    No. 05-18-00182-CV
    WILLIAM CARR, Appellant
    V.
    ATLAS GC WORLDWIDE, LLC, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court
    Dallas County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06357
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown
    Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
    This Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal as it appeared the notice of appeal
    was untimely. We instructed appellant to file a letter brief addressing the issue with an opportunity
    for appellee to respond. The parties complied.
    In his notice of appeal, appellant states he is appealing from the trial court’s September 29,
    2017 judgment nunc pro tunc and the trial court’s January 5, 2018 order denying his motion for
    new trial. An order denying a motion for new trial is not an independently appealable order with
    a separate timetable for appeal. See State Office of Risk Mgmt. v. Berdan, 
    335 S.W.3d 421
    , 428
    (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2011, pet. denied); Denton County v. Huther, 
    43 S.W.3d 665
    , 667
    (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001, no pet.).
    If a party files a timely post-judgment motion extending the appellate timetable, the notice
    of appeal is due ninety days after the date the judgment is signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).
    Without a timely notice of appeal, this Court lacks jurisdiction. See 
    id. 25.1(b). The
    appealed judgment was signed on September 27, 2017. Appellant filed a timely
    motion for new trial on October 6, 2017. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due on December
    26, 2017, ninety days after the date the judgment was signed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a).
    Appellant filed a notice of appeal on February 7, 2018, forty-three days past the deadline.
    Appellant fails to address the timeliness of the notice of appeal in his letter brief. Rather,
    he asserts this Court has jurisdiction because the appealed order is void for various reasons.
    Appellant’s assertions that the appealed judgment is void do not alter the deadline for filing a
    notice of appeal. Because appellant failed to timely file a notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal
    for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    /Carolyn Wright/
    CAROLYN WRIGHT
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    180182F.P05
    –2–
    S
    Court of Appeals
    Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
    JUDGMENT
    WILLIAM CARR, Appellant                           On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District
    Court, Dallas County, Texas
    No. 05-18-00182-CV        V.                      Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06357.
    Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
    ATLAS GC WORLDWIDE, LLC,                          Justices Evans and Brown participating.
    Appellee
    In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
    It is ORDERED that appellee ATLAS GC WORLDWIDE, LLC recover its costs of this
    appeal from appellant WILLIAM CARR.
    Judgment entered July 25, 2018.
    –3–
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 05-18-00182-CV

Filed Date: 7/25/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/30/2018