in the Interest of P.A.D., a Child ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed July 19, 2018
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    __________
    No. 11-18-00160-CV
    __________
    IN THE INTEREST OF P.A.D., A CHILD
    On Appeal from the 42nd District Court
    Coleman County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. CV06352
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On June 27, 2018, appellate counsel for P.A.D.’s parents filed a notice of appeal
    relating to the order of termination of parental rights that was signed by the trial court
    on April 19, 2018. When the appeal was docketed in this court, the clerk of this court
    notified the parties that it appeared to this court that the notice of appeal was not timely
    filed, and we requested that Appellants’ counsel respond and show grounds to
    continue the appeal. Appellants’ counsel has not responded to this court’s letter.
    The documents on file in this appeal show that, on April 19, the trial court
    signed an order of termination that was a final, appealable order. The notice of appeal
    was therefore due to be filed on May 9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(b) (providing that,
    in an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal, must be filed within twenty days after
    the date the order was signed). Appellants did not file their notice of appeal until June
    27—after the deadline and also after the time in which this court would be authorized
    to grant a fifteen-day extension. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. We are prohibited from
    suspending the Rules of Appellate Procedure “to alter the time for perfecting an appeal
    in a civil case.” TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Absent a timely notice of appeal, this court is
    without jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Wilkins v. Methodist Health Care
    Sys., 
    160 S.W.3d 559
    , 564 (Tex. 2005); Garza v. Hibernia Nat’l Bank, 
    227 S.W.3d 233
    , 233–34 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.); see also Verburgt v.
    Dorner, 
    959 S.W.2d 615
    , 617 (Tex. 1997). Because we are without jurisdiction, we
    must dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
    This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
    PER CURIAM
    July 19, 2018
    Panel consists of: Willson, J.,
    Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1
    1
    Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
    sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-18-00160-CV

Filed Date: 7/19/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/23/2018