Leticia Miller Curtis v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • Opinion filed September 13, 2018
    In The
    Eleventh Court of Appeals
    ____________
    No. 11-18-00209-CR
    ____________
    LETICIA MILLER CURTIS, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 42nd District Court
    Taylor County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 27606A
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Appellant, Leticia Miller Curtis, entered into a plea agreement with the State
    and pleaded guilty to the third-degree felony offense of driving while intoxicated.
    In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, the trial court assessed
    Appellant’s punishment at confinement for six years. Appellant filed a pro se notice
    of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.
    This court notified Appellant by letter that we had received information from
    the trial court that this is a plea bargain case in which Appellant has no right of
    appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). We requested that Appellant respond
    and show grounds to continue the appeal. Appellant filed a response, but it does not
    provide any grounds upon which this appeal may continue.
    Rule 25.2(a)(2) provides that, in a plea bargain case in which the punishment
    does not exceed the punishment agreed to in the plea bargain, “a defendant may
    appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on
    before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.”                             The
    documents on file in this appeal reflect that Appellant entered into a plea bargain,
    that her punishment was assessed in accordance with the plea bargain, and that
    Appellant waived her right of appeal. The trial court certified that Appellant has no
    right of appeal. Both the plea agreement and the trial court’s certification were
    signed by Appellant, Appellant’s counsel, and the judge of the trial court. The
    documents on file in this court support the trial court’s certification. See Dears v.
    State, 
    154 S.W.3d 610
    , 613–14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we must
    dismiss this appeal without further action. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); Chavez v. State,
    
    183 S.W.3d 675
    , 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).
    Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
    PER CURIAM
    September 13, 2018
    Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
    Panel consists of: Willson, J.,
    Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1
    Willson, J., not participating.
    1
    Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland,
    sitting by assignment.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11-18-00209-CR

Filed Date: 9/13/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/15/2018