Israel Hill v. State ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                                                              11th Court of Appeals

                                                                      Eastland, Texas

                                                                            Opinion

     

    Israel Hill

    Appellant

    Vs.                   No. 11-05-00250-CR -- Appeal from Dallas County

    State of Texas

    Appellee

     

    The trial court convicted Israel Hill, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated assault.  A plea bargain agreement was not reached. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for 20 years.  We affirm.

    Appellant=s court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw.  The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and states that he has concluded that the appeal is frivolous.  Counsel has provided appellant with a copy of the brief and advised appellant of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel=s brief.  A response has not been filed.  Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Cr.App.1991); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Cr.App.1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969); Eaden v. State, 161 S.W.3d 173 (Tex.App. - Eastland 2005, no pet=n).

    Following the procedures outlined in Anders, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is without merit.

    The motion to withdraw is granted, and the judgment is affirmed.

     

    PER CURIAM

    September 29, 2005

    Do not publish.  See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(b).

    Panel consists of:  Wright, J., and McCall, J.[1]



    [1]W. G. Arnot, III, Chief Justice, retired effective July 31, 2005.  The chief justice position is vacant.