Michael Lopez v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                          COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-17-00341-CR
    MICHAEL LOPEZ                                                        APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                         STATE
    ----------
    FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY
    TRIAL COURT NO. 1490785D
    ----------
    MEMORANDUM OPINION 1
    ----------
    Appellant Michael Lopez was indicted on two counts of aggravated assault
    with a deadly weapon, and at the conclusion of his trial, the trial court found him
    guilty of the second count but not guilty of the first count and assessed Lopez’s
    punishment for the single conviction at ten years’ confinement.       The written
    1
    See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
    judgments nonetheless reflect that Lopez was found guilty of both counts and
    sentenced to ten years’ confinement for each count, to be served concurrently.
    In a single issue, Lopez complains that the trial court’s written judgment on
    count one conflicts with the trial court’s oral pronouncement of acquittal on that
    count. He asks that we reform the judgment on that count to reflect the trial
    court’s oral pronouncement of acquittal and that we remove the language from
    both judgments requiring that his sentences run concurrently because there
    should be only one sentence, for the count for which he was found guilty. The
    State agrees that there is such a conflict and that we should accordingly reform
    the judgments.
    When there is a conflict between the trial court’s oral pronouncement and
    its written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls, and the solution is to
    reform the written judgment to conform to the oral pronouncement. Taylor v.
    State, 
    131 S.W.3d 497
    , 500, 502 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004).            Accordingly, we
    sustain Lopez’s sole issue and modify the trial court’s judgments to reflect that he
    was acquitted on count one and that there is only one ten-year sentence for his
    conviction on count two. We affirm the trial court’s judgments as modified. See
    Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(b).
    2
    /s/ Bonnie Sudderth
    BONNIE SUDDERTH
    CHIEF JUSTICE
    PANEL: SUDDERTH, C.J.; PITTMAN and BIRDWELL, JJ.
    DO NOT PUBLISH
    Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
    DELIVERED: July 5, 2018
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-17-00341-CR

Filed Date: 7/5/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 7/9/2018